From Right to Permission: Asylum, Mediterranean Migrations, and Europe’s War on Smuggling

Maurizio Albahari
{"title":"From Right to Permission: Asylum, Mediterranean Migrations, and Europe’s War on Smuggling","authors":"Maurizio Albahari","doi":"10.1177/2331502418767088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) and its member states have sought to curb unauthorized maritime migrant arrivals through a proactive combination of deterrence, intelligence, surveillance, anti-smuggling activities, border enforcement, and policing and readmission collaboration with Turkey, Libya, and Libya’s African neighbors. Through these actions, the right to seek asylum is being de facto transformed into a state-granted permission to seek asylum. Containment policies ensure that one cannot ask for sovereign permission without first paying smugglers. In support of their policies, EU and national authorities widely use an anti-smuggling discourse that focuses on the ruthlessness of smugglers and the passive victimhood of migrants, including asylum seekers and refugees. This rhetoric aligns itself with what is perceived to be politically palatable, and it contributes to preserving a volatile status quo. EU and national policies have failed to significantly curb maritime arrivals. Migrants face worsened conditions on Libyan soil, and death at sea. In recent memory, 2011 was seen as the deadliest year on record for Mediterranean migrations, only to be surpassed first by 2014 and then by 2016. During 2017, at least 3,119 persons died or went missing in the Mediterranean Sea (UNHCR 2017b). Deterrence, containment, and the related war on smuggling prove ineffective and do not justify such a heavy cost. They quell the outrage cyclically generated by powerful images of Mediterranean carnage, even as they fail to mitigate the carnage itself. European and other liberal-democratic governments can act in more pragmatic, just, and dignified ways, including by attending to migrant agency and to local civic engagements. Provisions for family reunification, refugee resettlement, study visas, and temporary protection should be enhanced. More ambitiously, governments need to reverse the very policies that eviscerate the right to seek asylum. In addition, labor immigration quotas should be set that go beyond attracting skilled “talent” and seasonal workers, to reflect the demands of the job market and of Europe’s ageing societies, while protecting worker rights. Such measures would lessen unauthorized arrivals and the demand for smugglers, ease asylum workloads, and challenge nativist arguments. There is always a political market for effective policies such as these, but until European authorities begin to reject easy resort to tropes of ruthless smuggler criminality, that market will remain disturbingly untapped.","PeriodicalId":90638,"journal":{"name":"Journal on migration and human security","volume":"81 1","pages":"121 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on migration and human security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2331502418767088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The European Union (EU) and its member states have sought to curb unauthorized maritime migrant arrivals through a proactive combination of deterrence, intelligence, surveillance, anti-smuggling activities, border enforcement, and policing and readmission collaboration with Turkey, Libya, and Libya’s African neighbors. Through these actions, the right to seek asylum is being de facto transformed into a state-granted permission to seek asylum. Containment policies ensure that one cannot ask for sovereign permission without first paying smugglers. In support of their policies, EU and national authorities widely use an anti-smuggling discourse that focuses on the ruthlessness of smugglers and the passive victimhood of migrants, including asylum seekers and refugees. This rhetoric aligns itself with what is perceived to be politically palatable, and it contributes to preserving a volatile status quo. EU and national policies have failed to significantly curb maritime arrivals. Migrants face worsened conditions on Libyan soil, and death at sea. In recent memory, 2011 was seen as the deadliest year on record for Mediterranean migrations, only to be surpassed first by 2014 and then by 2016. During 2017, at least 3,119 persons died or went missing in the Mediterranean Sea (UNHCR 2017b). Deterrence, containment, and the related war on smuggling prove ineffective and do not justify such a heavy cost. They quell the outrage cyclically generated by powerful images of Mediterranean carnage, even as they fail to mitigate the carnage itself. European and other liberal-democratic governments can act in more pragmatic, just, and dignified ways, including by attending to migrant agency and to local civic engagements. Provisions for family reunification, refugee resettlement, study visas, and temporary protection should be enhanced. More ambitiously, governments need to reverse the very policies that eviscerate the right to seek asylum. In addition, labor immigration quotas should be set that go beyond attracting skilled “talent” and seasonal workers, to reflect the demands of the job market and of Europe’s ageing societies, while protecting worker rights. Such measures would lessen unauthorized arrivals and the demand for smugglers, ease asylum workloads, and challenge nativist arguments. There is always a political market for effective policies such as these, but until European authorities begin to reject easy resort to tropes of ruthless smuggler criminality, that market will remain disturbingly untapped.
从权利到许可:庇护、地中海移民和欧洲对走私的战争
欧盟(EU)及其成员国寻求通过积极结合威慑、情报、监视、反走私活动、边境执法以及与土耳其、利比亚和利比亚的非洲邻国开展警务和重新接纳合作,遏制未经授权的海上移民入境。通过这些行动,寻求庇护的权利实际上正在转变为国家给予的寻求庇护许可。遏制政策确保一个人在不先付钱给走私者的情况下不能要求主权许可。为了支持其政策,欧盟和各国当局广泛使用反走私话语,重点关注走私者的无情和移民的被动受害者,包括寻求庇护者和难民。这种言辞与被认为是政治上可接受的东西一致,有助于保持不稳定的现状。欧盟和各国的政策未能显著遏制海上移民。移民在利比亚的土地上面临着更恶劣的条件,并在海上死亡。在最近的记忆中,2011年被视为有记录以来地中海移民死亡人数最多的一年,直到2014年和2016年才被超越。2017年,至少有3119人在地中海死亡或失踪(UNHCR 2017b)。威慑、遏制以及相关的打击走私的战争被证明是无效的,不能证明付出如此沉重的代价是合理的。它们平息了地中海大屠杀的有力图像周期性引发的愤怒,即使它们未能减轻大屠杀本身。欧洲和其他自由民主政府可以以更务实、公正和有尊严的方式行事,包括参与移民机构和当地公民的参与。应加强对家庭团聚、难民安置、学习签证和临时保护的规定。更有雄心的是,政府需要扭转那些剥夺寻求庇护权利的政策。此外,劳工移民配额的设定应超越吸引熟练“人才”和季节性工人,以反映就业市场和欧洲老龄化社会的需求,同时保护工人的权利。这些措施将减少非法入境和对走私者的需求,减轻庇护工作量,并挑战本土主义者的论点。诸如此类的有效政策总是存在政治市场的,但在欧洲当局开始拒绝轻易诉诸于无情的走私者犯罪的说法之前,这个市场仍将令人不安地未被开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信