Pitfalls of 3D Saturation Modelling in the Middle East

D. O'Meara
{"title":"Pitfalls of 3D Saturation Modelling in the Middle East","authors":"D. O'Meara","doi":"10.2118/196634-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper shows how greater scientific rigor in discussions of modelling 3D saturations in the Middle East can lead to better understanding of the reservoirs. It demonstrates with examples how vocabulary limits ability to solve problems related to saturations, compartmentalization, and permeability. It raises the bar on technical discussions of saturation.\n \"Saturation-height modelling\", \"transition zones\", and \"Thomeer hyperbolas\" are examples of terms that repeatedly confuse discussions of modelling 3D saturations in the Middle East. Vocabulary exposes a lack of scientific rigor, impedes progress, and leads to notable failures. Saturation is not merely a function of height. At the very least, it also depends on porosity, permeability, fluid densities, interfacial tension, and contact angle. Limiting it to height requires adding in all of these other functionalities as afterthoughts rather than incorporating them naturally through dimensional analysis. Most glaringly, it obscures the very useful role that saturations have in constraining permeability modelling and identifying reservoir compartments.\n \"Transition zones\" focus on saturation and take emphasis away from relative permeability and fractional flow. Bimodal pore systems (abundant in the Middle East) can have such low relative permeability to water at high saturations that even 70% water saturation can produce dry oil. In such cases, talk of a transition zone is counterproductive as it implies high water production.\n \"Thomeer hyperbolas\" reveal biases in how to fit capillary pressure curves. Force-fitting all data with a single model is inadequate. It takes emphasis away from understanding pore systems of rocks in favor of promoting a single-minded view. These examples and their implications are discussed in detail.\n The existing literature is replete with incomplete explanations and misunderstandings that lead to notable failures in modelling Middle Eastern fields. Understandings predicated on simplified descriptions of homogeneous reservoirs are no longer sustainable. A more scientifically rigorous methodology is presented.","PeriodicalId":11098,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196634-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper shows how greater scientific rigor in discussions of modelling 3D saturations in the Middle East can lead to better understanding of the reservoirs. It demonstrates with examples how vocabulary limits ability to solve problems related to saturations, compartmentalization, and permeability. It raises the bar on technical discussions of saturation. "Saturation-height modelling", "transition zones", and "Thomeer hyperbolas" are examples of terms that repeatedly confuse discussions of modelling 3D saturations in the Middle East. Vocabulary exposes a lack of scientific rigor, impedes progress, and leads to notable failures. Saturation is not merely a function of height. At the very least, it also depends on porosity, permeability, fluid densities, interfacial tension, and contact angle. Limiting it to height requires adding in all of these other functionalities as afterthoughts rather than incorporating them naturally through dimensional analysis. Most glaringly, it obscures the very useful role that saturations have in constraining permeability modelling and identifying reservoir compartments. "Transition zones" focus on saturation and take emphasis away from relative permeability and fractional flow. Bimodal pore systems (abundant in the Middle East) can have such low relative permeability to water at high saturations that even 70% water saturation can produce dry oil. In such cases, talk of a transition zone is counterproductive as it implies high water production. "Thomeer hyperbolas" reveal biases in how to fit capillary pressure curves. Force-fitting all data with a single model is inadequate. It takes emphasis away from understanding pore systems of rocks in favor of promoting a single-minded view. These examples and their implications are discussed in detail. The existing literature is replete with incomplete explanations and misunderstandings that lead to notable failures in modelling Middle Eastern fields. Understandings predicated on simplified descriptions of homogeneous reservoirs are no longer sustainable. A more scientifically rigorous methodology is presented.
中东地区3D饱和建模的陷阱
这篇论文表明,在中东建立三维饱和度模型的讨论中,更严格的科学研究可以更好地理解储层。它通过示例说明词汇如何限制解决与饱和、分区和渗透性相关的问题的能力。它提高了饱和度技术讨论的门槛。“饱和度-高度建模”、“过渡区”和“多墨墨双曲线”是一些术语的例子,这些术语反复混淆了中东3D饱和度建模的讨论。词汇暴露了缺乏科学严谨性,阻碍了进步,并导致了显著的失败。饱和度不仅仅是高度的函数。至少,它还取决于孔隙度、渗透率、流体密度、界面张力和接触角。将其限制在高度上需要添加所有这些其他功能,而不是通过尺寸分析自然地合并它们。最明显的是,它模糊了饱和度在限制渗透率建模和识别储层隔室方面的非常有用的作用。“过渡带”关注的是饱和度,而不是相对渗透率和分流。双峰孔隙系统(在中东地区非常丰富)在高饱和度下对水的相对渗透率非常低,即使70%的含水饱和度也能产生干油。在这种情况下,谈论过渡区是适得其反的,因为它意味着高产水量。“多默双曲线”揭示了如何拟合毛细管压力曲线的偏差。用单一模型强制拟合所有数据是不够的。它将重点从对岩石孔隙系统的理解转移到促进单一观点上。详细讨论了这些例子及其含义。现有的文献充满了不完整的解释和误解,导致了中东油田建模的显着失败。基于对均质储层的简化描述的理解不再可持续。提出了一种更为科学严谨的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信