Biosimilars: A Review of Published Randomized Control Trials Comparing Biosimilars with their Reference Products

R. Olteanu, M. Constantin, Alexandra Zota
{"title":"Biosimilars: A Review of Published Randomized Control Trials Comparing Biosimilars with their Reference Products","authors":"R. Olteanu, M. Constantin, Alexandra Zota","doi":"10.4172/2379-1764.1000252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biosimilars represent a therapeutic revolution for many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Biosimilars have different regulatory requirements than those of originators. These regulatory requirements are based on the evidence generated from bioequivalence studies, and in particular from RCTs. The goal of our review was to search for published randomized control trials that investigate biosimilars compared to their reference medicine (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab) in chronic inflammatory diseases (psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative cholitis, by using the Medline (PubMed) databases. Nineteen randomized control trials investigating biosimilars compared to their reference drug were included. As of November 2017, five anti-TNF biosimilar agents have been granted approval and are available on the market for patients with as inflammatory disease in the European Union. The Infliximab biosimilars CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra) and SB2 (Flixabi), the etanercept biosimilars SB4 (Benepali) and GP2015 (Elrezi) and adalimumb biosimilars ABP501 (Amgevita, Solymbic), SB5 (Imraldi) and BI 695501(Cyltezo). Evidence of equivalence between biosimilars and reference drugs was supported by head-to-head randomized clinical trials: two published randomized clinical trials for SB2, SB4, GP2015, ABP501, SB5, BI695501 and three published randomized control trial in the case of CT-P13 and ABP 501. Although not all randomized clinical trials comparing biosimilar to its reference product have been published, the present situation is satisfactory and provision of further clinical trials awaited.","PeriodicalId":7277,"journal":{"name":"Advanced techniques in biology & medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced techniques in biology & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2379-1764.1000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Biosimilars represent a therapeutic revolution for many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Biosimilars have different regulatory requirements than those of originators. These regulatory requirements are based on the evidence generated from bioequivalence studies, and in particular from RCTs. The goal of our review was to search for published randomized control trials that investigate biosimilars compared to their reference medicine (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab) in chronic inflammatory diseases (psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative cholitis, by using the Medline (PubMed) databases. Nineteen randomized control trials investigating biosimilars compared to their reference drug were included. As of November 2017, five anti-TNF biosimilar agents have been granted approval and are available on the market for patients with as inflammatory disease in the European Union. The Infliximab biosimilars CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra) and SB2 (Flixabi), the etanercept biosimilars SB4 (Benepali) and GP2015 (Elrezi) and adalimumb biosimilars ABP501 (Amgevita, Solymbic), SB5 (Imraldi) and BI 695501(Cyltezo). Evidence of equivalence between biosimilars and reference drugs was supported by head-to-head randomized clinical trials: two published randomized clinical trials for SB2, SB4, GP2015, ABP501, SB5, BI695501 and three published randomized control trial in the case of CT-P13 and ABP 501. Although not all randomized clinical trials comparing biosimilar to its reference product have been published, the present situation is satisfactory and provision of further clinical trials awaited.
生物类似药:已发表的比较生物类似药与其参考产品的随机对照试验综述
生物仿制药代表了许多免疫介导的炎症性疾病的治疗革命。生物仿制药的监管要求与原研药不同。这些监管要求是基于生物等效性研究,特别是随机对照试验得出的证据。本综述的目的是通过Medline (PubMed)数据库检索已发表的随机对照试验,研究生物仿制药与参考药物(英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、依那西普、乌斯特金单抗)在慢性炎症性疾病(银屑病、银屑病关节炎、类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、克罗恩病、溃疡性胆道炎)中的疗效。纳入了19项随机对照试验,研究生物仿制药与其参比药物的对比。截至2017年11月,五种抗tnf生物类似药已获得批准,并可在欧盟市场上用于炎症性疾病患者。英夫利昔单抗生物类似药CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra)和SB2 (Flixabi),依那西普生物类似药SB4 (Benepali)和GP2015 (Elrezi)以及阿达仑生物类似药ABP501 (Amgevita, Solymbic), SB5 (Imraldi)和BI 695501(Cyltezo)。生物仿制药与参比药等效性的证据得到了头对头随机临床试验的支持:2项已发表的针对SB2、SB4、GP2015、ABP501、SB5、BI695501的随机临床试验和3项针对CT-P13和ABP501的随机对照试验。虽然并不是所有比较生物仿制药与其参比产品的随机临床试验都已发表,但目前的情况令人满意,并等待进一步的临床试验的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信