Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic (3E) analysis of gas liquefaction and gas associated liquids recovery co-process based on the mixed fluid cascade refrigeration systems

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hossein Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, Zahra Jafarabadi, Ghassem Valizadeh, Mohammad Hemmati
{"title":"Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic (3E) analysis of gas liquefaction and gas associated liquids recovery co-process based on the mixed fluid cascade refrigeration systems","authors":"Hossein Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, Zahra Jafarabadi, Ghassem Valizadeh, Mohammad Hemmati","doi":"10.30492/IJCCE.2021.141462.4442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis is performed on the recent trend of joint production of liquefied natural gas and natural gas liquids based on Mixed fluid cascade most important refrigeration systems. The proposed process is first simulated and exergticly analyzed, and finally, an economic model is used to analyze the exergoeconomic performance. The results include the cost of exergy destruction, exergoeconomic factors, and exergy efficiency. The exergy analysis results show that the proposed process’s exergy efficiency is about 53.84%, and the destruction rate is 42618 kW with LNG and NGL production rates of 69.00 kg/s and 27.42 kg/s, respectively. Also, results show that the maximum exergoeconomic factor, which is 69.53%, is related to the second compressor in the liquefaction cycle. The lowest exergoeconomic factor, which is 0.67%, is related to the fourth heat exchanger in the liquefaction cycle. In this process, the distillation tower has the highest relative cost variation (100.81), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the smallest relative cost difference (1.08). One of the most costly economic factors is the cost of exergy destruction rates. The second heat exchanger has the exergy destruction cost (768.93 $/GJ), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the lowest exergy destruction cost (19.38 $/GJ).","PeriodicalId":14572,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2021.141462.4442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis is performed on the recent trend of joint production of liquefied natural gas and natural gas liquids based on Mixed fluid cascade most important refrigeration systems. The proposed process is first simulated and exergticly analyzed, and finally, an economic model is used to analyze the exergoeconomic performance. The results include the cost of exergy destruction, exergoeconomic factors, and exergy efficiency. The exergy analysis results show that the proposed process’s exergy efficiency is about 53.84%, and the destruction rate is 42618 kW with LNG and NGL production rates of 69.00 kg/s and 27.42 kg/s, respectively. Also, results show that the maximum exergoeconomic factor, which is 69.53%, is related to the second compressor in the liquefaction cycle. The lowest exergoeconomic factor, which is 0.67%, is related to the fourth heat exchanger in the liquefaction cycle. In this process, the distillation tower has the highest relative cost variation (100.81), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the smallest relative cost difference (1.08). One of the most costly economic factors is the cost of exergy destruction rates. The second heat exchanger has the exergy destruction cost (768.93 $/GJ), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the lowest exergy destruction cost (19.38 $/GJ).
基于混合流体梯级制冷系统的气体液化和气体伴生液体回收协同过程的能量、火用和燃烧经济性(3E)分析
本文从能源、火用和火用经济的角度分析了液化天然气和天然气液联合生产的新趋势,并以混合流体梯级制冷系统为基础进行了分析。首先对所提出的过程进行了模拟和能量分析,最后建立了一个经济模型来分析能量经济性。结果包括能源破坏成本、能源经济因素和能源效率。火用分析结果表明,该工艺的火用效率约为53.84%,破坏率为42618 kW, LNG和NGL产量分别为69.00 kg/s和27.42 kg/s。结果表明,液化循环中第二压气机的运行经济性系数最大,为69.53%。最低的耗功经济系数为0.67%,与液化循环的第4个换热器有关。其中蒸馏塔相对成本差异最大(100.81),液化循环第一空冷却器相对成本差异最小(1.08)。最昂贵的经济因素之一是能源破坏率的成本。第2个换热器的火用破坏成本为768.93美元/GJ,液化循环第1个空冷器的火用破坏成本最低,为19.38美元/GJ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering is to foster the growth of educational, scientific and Industrial Research activities among chemists and chemical engineers and to provide a medium for mutual communication and relations between Iranian academia and the industry on the one hand, and the world the scientific community on the other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信