A Deep Learning Approach in Rebubbling After Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

T. Hayashi, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Hiroki Masumoto, Shoji Morita, Itaru Oyakawa, S. Inoda, Naoko Kato, Hidenori Takahashi
{"title":"A Deep Learning Approach in Rebubbling After Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.","authors":"T. Hayashi, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Hiroki Masumoto, Shoji Morita, Itaru Oyakawa, S. Inoda, Naoko Kato, Hidenori Takahashi","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo evaluate the efficacy of deep learning in judging the need for rebubbling after Descemet's endothelial membrane keratoplasty (DMEK).\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis retrospective study included eyes that underwent rebubbling after DMEK (rebubbling group: RB group) and the same number of eyes that did not require rebubbling (non-RB group), based on medical records. To classify the RB group, randomly selected images from anterior segment optical coherence tomography at postoperative day 5 were evaluated by corneal specialists. The criterion for rebubbling was the condition where graft detachment reached the central 4.0-mm pupil area. We trained nine types of deep neural network structures (VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, Xception, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, and DenseNet201) and built nine models. Using each model, we tested the validation data and evaluated the model.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThis study included 496 images (31 eyes from 24 patients) in the RB group and 496 images (31 eyes from 29 patients) in the non-RB group. Because 16 picture images were obtained from the same point of each eye, a total of 992 images were obtained. The VGG19 model was found to have the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of all models. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the VGG19 model were 0.964, 0.967, and 0.915, respectively, whereas those of the best ensemble model were 0.956, 0.913, and 0.921, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis automated system that enables the physician to be aware of the requirement of RB might be clinically useful.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of deep learning in judging the need for rebubbling after Descemet's endothelial membrane keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS This retrospective study included eyes that underwent rebubbling after DMEK (rebubbling group: RB group) and the same number of eyes that did not require rebubbling (non-RB group), based on medical records. To classify the RB group, randomly selected images from anterior segment optical coherence tomography at postoperative day 5 were evaluated by corneal specialists. The criterion for rebubbling was the condition where graft detachment reached the central 4.0-mm pupil area. We trained nine types of deep neural network structures (VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, Xception, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, and DenseNet201) and built nine models. Using each model, we tested the validation data and evaluated the model. RESULTS This study included 496 images (31 eyes from 24 patients) in the RB group and 496 images (31 eyes from 29 patients) in the non-RB group. Because 16 picture images were obtained from the same point of each eye, a total of 992 images were obtained. The VGG19 model was found to have the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of all models. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the VGG19 model were 0.964, 0.967, and 0.915, respectively, whereas those of the best ensemble model were 0.956, 0.913, and 0.921, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This automated system that enables the physician to be aware of the requirement of RB might be clinically useful.
Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术后再泡的深度学习方法。
目的评价深度学习在Descemet角膜内皮膜移植术(DMEK)后是否需要再泡中的应用效果。方法本回顾性研究包括DMEK术后再泡眼(再泡组:RB组)和相同数量的不需要再泡眼(非RB组),根据医疗记录。为了对RB组进行分类,角膜专家对术后第5天随机选择的前段光学相干断层扫描图像进行评估。再泡的标准是移植物脱离到达4.0 mm瞳孔中心区域。我们训练了9种深度神经网络结构(VGG16、VGG19、ResNet50、InceptionV3、InceptionResNetV2、Xception、DenseNet121、DenseNet169和DenseNet201),并建立了9个模型。使用每个模型,我们对验证数据进行测试并对模型进行评估。结果本研究纳入RB组496张图像(24例患者31只眼),非RB组496张图像(29例患者31只眼)。由于每只眼睛同一点获得16幅图像,因此共获得992幅图像。在所有模型中,VGG19模型的受者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积最大。VGG19模型的AUC、灵敏度和特异度分别为0.964、0.967和0.915,最佳集合模型的AUC、灵敏度和特异度分别为0.956、0.913和0.921。结论该自动化系统可使医生了解RB的要求,在临床上可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信