Walking a Fine Line—Educators' Views on Politicized Topics in Schooling: Findings from the State of the American Teacher and State of the American Principal Surveys

Ashley Woo, E. Steiner, Sy Doan, H. Schwartz
{"title":"Walking a Fine Line—Educators' Views on Politicized Topics in Schooling: Findings from the State of the American Teacher and State of the American Principal Surveys","authors":"Ashley Woo, E. Steiner, Sy Doan, H. Schwartz","doi":"10.7249/rra1108-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a time when simply carrying out the essential functions of their jobs is a herculean task, educators have been faced with the additional challenge of addressing contentious, politicized topics in their schools and classrooms. Drawing from nationally representative samples of teachers and principals who completed the 2022 State of the American Teacher and the State of the American Principal surveys and teacher interviews, the authors focus their analysis on two especially politically salient issues: (1) how to implement COVID-19 safety measures with the return to in-person schooling;and (2) the role and emphasis that discussions about race, racism, or bias may or should have in schools. They investigate how these two highly politicized topics might contribute to elevated job-related stress by examining potential contributing factors, such as the extent to which educators must manage conflicting beliefs and opinions, the adequacy of support they receive, and the hostility and aggression that they experience from others in response to related policies. The authors also explore differences by educator- and school-level characteristics. Although politicized topics are more contested in some school settings and locales than in others, survey results suggest that educators' beliefs about how schools should manage politicized issues vary within all kinds of school communities. The authors explore the consequences of politicization for educators' instructional practices, well-being, perceptions of their school and district climate, and intentions to leave their jobs. They provide implications and recommendations on how to support educators in navigating politicized issues in their schools and classrooms in a way that fosters productive discourse between communities and schools. [For the \"State of the American Teacher and State of the American Principal Surveys: 2022 Technical Documentation and Survey Results. Research Report. RR-A1108-3,\" see ED621137.]","PeriodicalId":90268,"journal":{"name":"Memorandum RM-. Rand Corporation","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memorandum RM-. Rand Corporation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7249/rra1108-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In a time when simply carrying out the essential functions of their jobs is a herculean task, educators have been faced with the additional challenge of addressing contentious, politicized topics in their schools and classrooms. Drawing from nationally representative samples of teachers and principals who completed the 2022 State of the American Teacher and the State of the American Principal surveys and teacher interviews, the authors focus their analysis on two especially politically salient issues: (1) how to implement COVID-19 safety measures with the return to in-person schooling;and (2) the role and emphasis that discussions about race, racism, or bias may or should have in schools. They investigate how these two highly politicized topics might contribute to elevated job-related stress by examining potential contributing factors, such as the extent to which educators must manage conflicting beliefs and opinions, the adequacy of support they receive, and the hostility and aggression that they experience from others in response to related policies. The authors also explore differences by educator- and school-level characteristics. Although politicized topics are more contested in some school settings and locales than in others, survey results suggest that educators' beliefs about how schools should manage politicized issues vary within all kinds of school communities. The authors explore the consequences of politicization for educators' instructional practices, well-being, perceptions of their school and district climate, and intentions to leave their jobs. They provide implications and recommendations on how to support educators in navigating politicized issues in their schools and classrooms in a way that fosters productive discourse between communities and schools. [For the "State of the American Teacher and State of the American Principal Surveys: 2022 Technical Documentation and Survey Results. Research Report. RR-A1108-3," see ED621137.]
走好路线——教育工作者对学校教育中政治化话题的看法:来自美国教师状况和美国校长状况调查的结果
在一个仅仅履行其工作的基本职能就是一项艰巨任务的时代,教育工作者面临着在学校和课堂上解决有争议的、政治化的话题的额外挑战。从完成2022年美国教师状况调查和美国校长状况调查以及教师访谈的全国代表性教师和校长样本中,作者将分析重点放在两个特别政治突出的问题上:(1)如何在恢复面对面教学的情况下实施COVID-19安全措施;(2)关于种族、种族主义或偏见的讨论可能或应该在学校中发挥的作用和重点。他们调查了这两个高度政治化的话题是如何通过检查潜在的影响因素来增加与工作相关的压力的,比如教育工作者必须在多大程度上管理相互冲突的信仰和观点,他们得到的支持是否足够,以及他们在回应相关政策时从他人那里经历的敌意和攻击。作者还探讨了教育者和学校层面特征的差异。尽管政治化话题在一些学校环境和地方比在其他地方更有争议,但调查结果表明,教育工作者对学校应如何管理政治化问题的看法在各种学校社区中各不相同。作者探讨了政治化对教育工作者的教学实践、福祉、对学校和学区气候的看法以及离职意图的影响。它们就如何支持教育工作者在学校和课堂中处理政治化问题,从而促进社区和学校之间富有成效的对话,提供了影响和建议。[查看“美国教师状况和美国校长状况调查:2022年技术文件和调查结果”。研究报告。RR-A1108-3,”见ED621137。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信