Left ventricular diastolic function compared to inferior vena cava diameter variation as predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanical ventilated patients with shock: The research protocol

Anutr Thitayanapong, S. Tongyoo
{"title":"Left ventricular diastolic function compared to inferior vena cava diameter variation as predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanical ventilated patients with shock: The research protocol","authors":"Anutr Thitayanapong, S. Tongyoo","doi":"10.54205/ccc.v30.254873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fluid responsiveness, defined as an increase in cardiac output by 15% after a fluid challenge, is recommended to be evaluated in-patients with shock. Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is associated with a lower increment of cardiac output after fluid challenge. Despite being a non-invasive test, the echocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular diastolic function was rarely studied for the prediction of fluid responsiveness. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of LV diastolic function in predicting fluid responsiveness, comparing with inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter variation method, among shock patients who required mechanical ventilation.\n\nMethods: We plan to enroll adult patients with shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters include IVC diameter variation, peak velocity of early diastolic filling of mitral valve inflow (E wave), peak early diastolic velocity of the mitral valve annulus (Ea), mitral E/Ea ratio, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and transaortic cardiac output (CO), all at baseline and after fluid therapy are measured. A fluid challenge with an infusion of 300 ml of acetate Ringer’s solution within 15 minutes will be given. Patients who have an increase in systolic blood pressure of at least 10 mmHg, mean arterial pressure of at least 5 mmHg or cardiac output of at least 15% are defined as fluid responders. The primary outcome of this study is the efficacy of the mitral E/Ea ratio comparing with IVC diameter variation in predicting fluid responsiveness. The secondary outcomes include the rate of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients and LVEF and CO in patients with shock in the intensive care units.\n\nConclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy of left ventricular diastolic function measured by the echocardiography (Mitral E/Ea ratio) in predicting fluid responsiveness among mechanical ventilated patients with shock.\n\nTrial registrations: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05066256, registered on January 10th, 2021","PeriodicalId":76963,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v30.254873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Fluid responsiveness, defined as an increase in cardiac output by 15% after a fluid challenge, is recommended to be evaluated in-patients with shock. Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is associated with a lower increment of cardiac output after fluid challenge. Despite being a non-invasive test, the echocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular diastolic function was rarely studied for the prediction of fluid responsiveness. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of LV diastolic function in predicting fluid responsiveness, comparing with inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter variation method, among shock patients who required mechanical ventilation. Methods: We plan to enroll adult patients with shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters include IVC diameter variation, peak velocity of early diastolic filling of mitral valve inflow (E wave), peak early diastolic velocity of the mitral valve annulus (Ea), mitral E/Ea ratio, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and transaortic cardiac output (CO), all at baseline and after fluid therapy are measured. A fluid challenge with an infusion of 300 ml of acetate Ringer’s solution within 15 minutes will be given. Patients who have an increase in systolic blood pressure of at least 10 mmHg, mean arterial pressure of at least 5 mmHg or cardiac output of at least 15% are defined as fluid responders. The primary outcome of this study is the efficacy of the mitral E/Ea ratio comparing with IVC diameter variation in predicting fluid responsiveness. The secondary outcomes include the rate of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients and LVEF and CO in patients with shock in the intensive care units. Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy of left ventricular diastolic function measured by the echocardiography (Mitral E/Ea ratio) in predicting fluid responsiveness among mechanical ventilated patients with shock. Trial registrations: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05066256, registered on January 10th, 2021
机械通气休克患者左室舒张功能与下腔静脉直径变化的比较:研究方案
背景:液体反应性,定义为在液体刺激后心输出量增加15%,被推荐用于评估住院休克患者。左心室(LV)舒张功能障碍与液体刺激后较低的心输出量增量有关。尽管超声心动图评价左心室舒张功能是一种无创测试,但很少研究其预测液体反应性。本研究的目的是评估左室舒张功能在预测需要机械通气的休克患者的液体反应性方面的有效性,并与下腔静脉(IVC)直径变化法进行比较。方法:我们计划纳入重症监护病房(ICU)的成年休克患者。超声心动图血流动力学参数包括静脉内径变化、二尖瓣血流舒张早期充盈峰值速度(E波)、二尖瓣环舒张早期峰值速度(Ea)、二尖瓣E/Ea比、左室射血分数(LVEF)和经主动脉心输出量(CO),均在基线和液体治疗后测量。15分钟内注射300毫升醋酸林格氏液进行液体挑战。收缩压升高至少10mmhg、平均动脉压升高至少5mmhg或心输出量升高至少15%的患者被定义为有液体反应。本研究的主要结果是二尖瓣E/Ea比值与下腔静脉直径变化在预测液体反应性方面的有效性。次要结果包括机械通气患者的液体反应率和重症监护病房休克患者的LVEF和CO。结论:本研究将评估超声心动图测量左心室舒张功能(二尖瓣E/Ea比值)在预测机械通气休克患者液体反应性中的作用。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05066256,于2021年1月10日注册
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信