Seabed Seismic Motion in Presence of Seismic Induced In-Profile Liquefaction

D. Bertalot, Simone Corciulo
{"title":"Seabed Seismic Motion in Presence of Seismic Induced In-Profile Liquefaction","authors":"D. Bertalot, Simone Corciulo","doi":"10.4043/29505-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cyclic loading caused by earthquake in sandy soils often leads to the development of positive pore pressures. In extreme conditions, the pore pressure may increase until reaching a state of zero effective stress associated with a dramatic reduction of the soil shear stiffness and strength. Even when liquefiable soils are found at depth, and capped by a non-liquefiable crust, once liquefied they can act as a seismic isolator, significantly modifying both amplitude and frequency content of the vertically propagating shear waves. As a result, seabed seismic motions at offshore sites characterized by the presence of liquefiable layers within the soil stratigraphy may change considerably with respect to a non-liquefied scenario. Non-linear Seismic Site Response Analyses (SSRA) are often used for site-specific evaluation of seismic input for offshore projects. Severe earthquake motions induce non-linear soil response associated with significant stiffness reduction for soft soils. The hysteretic non-linear soil behavior leads to modifications in terms of magnitude and frequency content compared to the postulated stiff soil input. This is even more important where pore pressure build-up and liquefaction may occur, leading to further modification of the seismic accelerations at mudline. However, standard industry practice consists in performing total stress SSRA that are not able to model the softening response in presence of liquefiable soil layers. This paper compares the seabed seismic motion assessed by means of total and effective stress SSRA in order to evaluate the effect of the soil stiffness degradation in liquefied layers within the soil profile, building upon the findings of Ardoino et al. (2015), who observed in-profile liquefaction to have a limited effect on mudline response spectrum. In particular, it is shown how modelling methodologies able to replicate the transient nature of excess pore pressure build-up during earthquake excitation (i.e. time-domain analyses), are better suited to capture seismic motion modifications in presence of in-profile liquefaction, with respect to response spectrum analyses. The effects of deep foundations embedded across the liquefied layers, on the propagation of the seismic motion, is also investigated and discussed.","PeriodicalId":10948,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29505-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyclic loading caused by earthquake in sandy soils often leads to the development of positive pore pressures. In extreme conditions, the pore pressure may increase until reaching a state of zero effective stress associated with a dramatic reduction of the soil shear stiffness and strength. Even when liquefiable soils are found at depth, and capped by a non-liquefiable crust, once liquefied they can act as a seismic isolator, significantly modifying both amplitude and frequency content of the vertically propagating shear waves. As a result, seabed seismic motions at offshore sites characterized by the presence of liquefiable layers within the soil stratigraphy may change considerably with respect to a non-liquefied scenario. Non-linear Seismic Site Response Analyses (SSRA) are often used for site-specific evaluation of seismic input for offshore projects. Severe earthquake motions induce non-linear soil response associated with significant stiffness reduction for soft soils. The hysteretic non-linear soil behavior leads to modifications in terms of magnitude and frequency content compared to the postulated stiff soil input. This is even more important where pore pressure build-up and liquefaction may occur, leading to further modification of the seismic accelerations at mudline. However, standard industry practice consists in performing total stress SSRA that are not able to model the softening response in presence of liquefiable soil layers. This paper compares the seabed seismic motion assessed by means of total and effective stress SSRA in order to evaluate the effect of the soil stiffness degradation in liquefied layers within the soil profile, building upon the findings of Ardoino et al. (2015), who observed in-profile liquefaction to have a limited effect on mudline response spectrum. In particular, it is shown how modelling methodologies able to replicate the transient nature of excess pore pressure build-up during earthquake excitation (i.e. time-domain analyses), are better suited to capture seismic motion modifications in presence of in-profile liquefaction, with respect to response spectrum analyses. The effects of deep foundations embedded across the liquefied layers, on the propagation of the seismic motion, is also investigated and discussed.
地震诱发剖面内液化存在下的海底地震运动
地震引起的砂质土循环荷载往往导致正孔隙压力的发展。在极端条件下,孔隙压力可能会增加,直至达到零有效应力状态,同时土体抗剪刚度和强度急剧降低。即使在深处发现了可液化的土壤,并且被不可液化的地壳覆盖,一旦液化,它们就可以作为地震隔离器,显著地改变垂直传播的剪切波的振幅和频率内容。因此,以土壤地层中存在可液化层为特征的近海地点的海底地震运动可能与非液化情景相比发生很大变化。非线性地震现场反应分析(SSRA)通常用于海上工程地震输入的现场特定评估。强烈地震运动引起的非线性土壤反应与软土的显著刚度降低有关。与假定的刚性土壤输入相比,滞回非线性土壤行为导致幅度和频率含量的变化。在孔隙压力积聚和液化可能发生的地方,这一点尤为重要,这将进一步改变泥线处的地震加速度。然而,标准的工业实践包括执行总应力SSRA,不能模拟存在液化土层的软化响应。本文在Ardoino等人(2015)的研究结果的基础上,比较了总应力和有效应力SSRA评估的海底地震运动,以评估土壤剖面内液化层中土壤刚度退化的影响,他们观察到剖面内液化对泥线反应谱的影响有限。特别是,它显示了建模方法如何能够复制地震激励期间超孔隙压力积聚的瞬态性质(即时域分析),更适合于捕获剖面内液化存在的地震运动变化,相对于响应谱分析。此外,还研究和讨论了跨液化层深基础对地震运动传播的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信