A Comparative Study of Different Dimensionality Reduction Methods with Naïve Bayes Classifier for Mapping Customer Requirements to Product Configurations

Yao Jiao, Yu Yang
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Different Dimensionality Reduction Methods with Naïve Bayes Classifier for Mapping Customer Requirements to Product Configurations","authors":"Yao Jiao, Yu Yang","doi":"10.14257/ijdta.2017.10.5.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mapping customer requirements to product configurations are difficult due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of customers’ expression. The Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) is suitable to quantify the expression of customers, and to map their requirements to configurations with good performance. However, the prerequisite of manually independent of product attributes for NBC require preprocess. Dimensionality reduction methods are effective for simplifying the data complexity while separating the correlations between data Against the background, this paper conducts a comparative study of 7 dimensionality reduction methods as preprocess procedure for integrating with NBC to map customer requirements to product configurations. Two realistic design cases are illustrated for the comparison, and the outcomes are measured by the accuracy and F-measure. The results of this study imply several findings that the loss of information has great impact on all methods, and linear methods are more sensitive to the loss of information, and several nonlinear methods are more capable in handling the loss of information than other methods, and local linear methods are suggested compared with global nonlinear methods.","PeriodicalId":13926,"journal":{"name":"International journal of database theory and application","volume":"50 1","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of database theory and application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14257/ijdta.2017.10.5.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mapping customer requirements to product configurations are difficult due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of customers’ expression. The Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) is suitable to quantify the expression of customers, and to map their requirements to configurations with good performance. However, the prerequisite of manually independent of product attributes for NBC require preprocess. Dimensionality reduction methods are effective for simplifying the data complexity while separating the correlations between data Against the background, this paper conducts a comparative study of 7 dimensionality reduction methods as preprocess procedure for integrating with NBC to map customer requirements to product configurations. Two realistic design cases are illustrated for the comparison, and the outcomes are measured by the accuracy and F-measure. The results of this study imply several findings that the loss of information has great impact on all methods, and linear methods are more sensitive to the loss of information, and several nonlinear methods are more capable in handling the loss of information than other methods, and local linear methods are suggested compared with global nonlinear methods.
基于Naïve贝叶斯分类器的不同降维方法在客户需求到产品配置映射中的比较研究
由于客户表达的不确定性和模糊性,将客户需求映射到产品配置是困难的。Naïve贝叶斯分类器(NBC)适合于量化客户的表达,并将客户的需求映射到性能良好的配置。然而,手工独立于产品属性的前提条件需要对NBC进行预处理。降维方法可以有效地简化数据复杂性,同时分离数据之间的相关性。在此背景下,本文对7种降维方法作为集成NBC将客户需求映射到产品配置的预处理程序进行了对比研究。以两个实际设计案例为例进行比较,并通过精度和F-measure来衡量结果。本研究的结果表明,信息丢失对所有方法都有很大的影响,线性方法对信息丢失更敏感,一些非线性方法比其他方法更能处理信息丢失,与全局非线性方法相比,建议采用局部线性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信