Determination of fetal occiput position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor.

D. Kreiser, E. Schiff, S. Lipitz, Z. Kayam, A. Avraham, R. Achiron
{"title":"Determination of fetal occiput position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor.","authors":"D. Kreiser, E. Schiff, S. Lipitz, Z. Kayam, A. Avraham, R. Achiron","doi":"10.1080/714904341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate whether ultrasonography is superior to vaginal examination for determination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 44 parturients. During the second stage of labor, an attending obstetrician performed a vaginal examination to detect fetal occiput position. This was followed by combined abdominal and perineal ultrasound examination. The two methods were compared to the true position. Results were analyzed using Student's t test for quantitative parameters. McNemar's and Fisher's exact tests were applied in order to examine differences between the study groups. Results: The error rate in detecting fetal occiput position was significantly lower using the ultrasound technique (6.8%) compared to vaginal examination (29.6%, p = 0.011). Parity, maternal body mass index or fetal weight had no influence on the error rate. Conclusions: Ultrasonographic determination of the fetal position is an accurate technique and ...","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"94 1","pages":"283-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/714904341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether ultrasonography is superior to vaginal examination for determination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 44 parturients. During the second stage of labor, an attending obstetrician performed a vaginal examination to detect fetal occiput position. This was followed by combined abdominal and perineal ultrasound examination. The two methods were compared to the true position. Results were analyzed using Student's t test for quantitative parameters. McNemar's and Fisher's exact tests were applied in order to examine differences between the study groups. Results: The error rate in detecting fetal occiput position was significantly lower using the ultrasound technique (6.8%) compared to vaginal examination (29.6%, p = 0.011). Parity, maternal body mass index or fetal weight had no influence on the error rate. Conclusions: Ultrasonographic determination of the fetal position is an accurate technique and ...
产程第二阶段胎儿枕位的超声测定。
目的:探讨超声检查在产程第二阶段确定胎儿枕位是否优于阴道检查。方法:对44例产妇进行前瞻性队列研究。在产程第二阶段,主治产科医生进行阴道检查以检测胎儿枕位。随后进行腹部和会阴超声联合检查。将两种方法与真实位置进行比较。定量参数采用Student’st检验。McNemar和Fisher的精确测试被应用于研究小组之间的差异。结果:超声检查胎儿枕部位置的错误率(6.8%)明显低于阴道检查(29.6%,p = 0.011)。胎次、母亲体重指数和胎儿体重对错误率无影响。结论:超声检查胎儿体位是一种准确、可靠的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信