Whatever Happened to Relativity of Title?

E. Cooke
{"title":"Whatever Happened to Relativity of Title?","authors":"E. Cooke","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198854067.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is about relativity of title and the law relating to adverse possession (also known as squatters’ rights), which used to be fundamental to land law but is now far less important following the enactment of the Land Registration Act 2002, where title is registered. The requirements for adverse possession are explained. The chapter examines the case law relating to the human rights implications of squatters’ title. The effect of adverse possession in registered land is explained. Finally, the chapter discusses the reasons why adverse possession continues to be a live concept and evaluates the impact and concerns of the 2002 Act.","PeriodicalId":81804,"journal":{"name":"Land and water law review","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land and water law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854067.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter is about relativity of title and the law relating to adverse possession (also known as squatters’ rights), which used to be fundamental to land law but is now far less important following the enactment of the Land Registration Act 2002, where title is registered. The requirements for adverse possession are explained. The chapter examines the case law relating to the human rights implications of squatters’ title. The effect of adverse possession in registered land is explained. Finally, the chapter discusses the reasons why adverse possession continues to be a live concept and evaluates the impact and concerns of the 2002 Act.
所有权的相对性究竟发生了什么?
本章是关于所有权的相关性和与逆权占有(也称为擅自占用者权利)相关的法律,这曾经是土地法的基础,但在2002年《土地登记法》颁布后,所有权的重要性大大降低。解释了逆权占有的条件。本章审查了与擅自占用者所有权所涉人权问题有关的判例法。对注册土地逆权占有的影响进行了解释。最后,本章讨论了时效占有仍然是一个活生生的概念的原因,并评估了2002年法案的影响和关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信