THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN THE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM PARADIGMS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

V. Popova
{"title":"THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN THE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM PARADIGMS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"V. Popova","doi":"10.37472/2617-3107-2022-5-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article identifies the factors which influence changes in the public-private partnerships (PPPs) paradigm in the system of vocational and technical education (VET) took place. The study is based on a comparative analysis of the foreign experience of implementing PPPs in the VET system. The reasons for changing the paradigm of the state dictate to the publicprivate partnerships are clarified, and the sequence of transition to the paradigm of delegating bythe state to the private sector not only economic risks but also the authority to comply with public values is determined. The study revealed that the PPPs paradigm in the VET system was formed under the influence of the concept of the New Public Management, which over time transformed into the New Public Governance with an orientation to public values. The main provisions of PPPs paradigms in the VET system comparative analysis showed that changes have taken place in the status of the pupil (student) in the private partners’ role and in the state responsibility sphere. The new PPPs paradigm for VET main provisions evolution consequence was changing in: the scope of declared goals, the size of investments, planning horizon, economic efficiency, thenumber of involved partners, and the distribution of risks between private and public partners.The results of the study confirmed that the presence of a paradigm as a model for posing a problem is mandatory for the social sciences: after all, it narrows the circle of scientific research, provides a research methodology, tools, and determines the practice of scientific knowledge. The comparative analysis showed that the modern paradigm of scientific research, that is, the model for posing a problem and solving it in the VET system, is the introduction of PPPs with a focus on public values.","PeriodicalId":33247,"journal":{"name":"Education Modern Discourses","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Modern Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2022-5-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article identifies the factors which influence changes in the public-private partnerships (PPPs) paradigm in the system of vocational and technical education (VET) took place. The study is based on a comparative analysis of the foreign experience of implementing PPPs in the VET system. The reasons for changing the paradigm of the state dictate to the publicprivate partnerships are clarified, and the sequence of transition to the paradigm of delegating bythe state to the private sector not only economic risks but also the authority to comply with public values is determined. The study revealed that the PPPs paradigm in the VET system was formed under the influence of the concept of the New Public Management, which over time transformed into the New Public Governance with an orientation to public values. The main provisions of PPPs paradigms in the VET system comparative analysis showed that changes have taken place in the status of the pupil (student) in the private partners’ role and in the state responsibility sphere. The new PPPs paradigm for VET main provisions evolution consequence was changing in: the scope of declared goals, the size of investments, planning horizon, economic efficiency, thenumber of involved partners, and the distribution of risks between private and public partners.The results of the study confirmed that the presence of a paradigm as a model for posing a problem is mandatory for the social sciences: after all, it narrows the circle of scientific research, provides a research methodology, tools, and determines the practice of scientific knowledge. The comparative analysis showed that the modern paradigm of scientific research, that is, the model for posing a problem and solving it in the VET system, is the introduction of PPPs with a focus on public values.
职业教育培训体系中的公私合作模式:比较分析
本文确定了影响职业技术教育(VET)系统中公私伙伴关系(ppp)范式变化的因素。本研究基于对国外在职业教育教育体系中实施公私合作模式的经验的比较分析。阐明了国家对公私合作模式转变的原因,并确定了向国家向私营部门下放经济风险和遵从公共价值的权力的范式转变的顺序。研究发现,职业教育教育体系中的ppp模式是在新公共管理理念的影响下形成的,随着时间的推移,新公共管理理念转变为以公共价值为导向的新公共治理。ppp模式在职业教育教育体系中的主要条款对比分析表明,学生在私营合作伙伴角色和国家责任领域的地位发生了变化。职业技术培训主要条款的新公私合作模式的演变结果在以下方面发生了变化:宣布目标的范围、投资规模、规划范围、经济效率、参与合作伙伴的数量以及私营和公共合作伙伴之间的风险分配。研究结果证实,作为提出问题的模型,范式的存在对社会科学来说是必不可少的:毕竟,它缩小了科学研究的范围,提供了研究方法和工具,并决定了科学知识的实践。对比分析表明,现代科学研究范式,即在职业技术教育体系中提出问题并解决问题的模式,是引入以公共价值为核心的ppp模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信