Association between RT-PCR Ct Values and COVID-19 New Daily Cases: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Abdulkarim Abdulrahman, Saad I. Mallah, A. Alawadhi, S. Perna, E. Janahi, M. Alqahtani
{"title":"Association between RT-PCR Ct Values and COVID-19 New Daily Cases: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Abdulkarim Abdulrahman, Saad I. Mallah, A. Alawadhi, S. Perna, E. Janahi, M. Alqahtani","doi":"10.1101/2020.12.07.20245233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Proactive prediction of the epidemiologic dynamics of viral diseases and outbreaks of the likes of COVID-19 has remained a difficult pursuit for scientists, public health researchers, and policymakers. It is unclear whether RT-PCR Cycle Threshold (Ct) values of COVID-19 (or any other virus) as indicator of viral load, could represent a possible predictor for underlying epidemiological changes on a population level. Objectives: To investigate whether population-wide changes in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Ct values over time are associated with the daily fraction of positive COVID-19 tests. In addition, this study analyses the factors that could influence the RT-PCR Ct values. Method: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 63,879 patients from May 4, 2020 to September 30, 2020, in all COVID-19 facilities in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Data collected included number of tests and newly diagnosed cases, as well as Ct values, age, gender nationality, and symptomatic status. Results: Ct values were found to be negatively and very weakly correlated with the fraction of daily positive cases in the population r = -0.06 (CI95%: -0.06; -0.05; p=0.001). The R-squared for the regression model (adjusting for age and number of daily tests) showed an accuracy of 45.3%. Ct Values showed an association with nationality (p=0.012). After the stratification, the association between Ct values and the fraction of daily positive cases was only maintained for the female gender and Bahraini-nationality. Symptomatic presentation was significantly associated with lower Ct values (higher viral loads). Ct values do not show any correlation with age (p=0.333) or gender (p=0.522). Conclusion: We report one of the first and largest studies to investigate the epidemiological associations of Ct values with COVID-19. Ct values offer a potentially simple and widely accessible tool to predict and model epidemiological dynamics on a population level. More population studies and predictive models from global cohorts are necessary.","PeriodicalId":17977,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina : rivista periodica di eziologia, epidemiologia, diagnostica, clinica e terapia delle patologie infettive","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Le infezioni in medicina : rivista periodica di eziologia, epidemiologia, diagnostica, clinica e terapia delle patologie infettive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.07.20245233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Introduction: Proactive prediction of the epidemiologic dynamics of viral diseases and outbreaks of the likes of COVID-19 has remained a difficult pursuit for scientists, public health researchers, and policymakers. It is unclear whether RT-PCR Cycle Threshold (Ct) values of COVID-19 (or any other virus) as indicator of viral load, could represent a possible predictor for underlying epidemiological changes on a population level. Objectives: To investigate whether population-wide changes in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Ct values over time are associated with the daily fraction of positive COVID-19 tests. In addition, this study analyses the factors that could influence the RT-PCR Ct values. Method: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 63,879 patients from May 4, 2020 to September 30, 2020, in all COVID-19 facilities in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Data collected included number of tests and newly diagnosed cases, as well as Ct values, age, gender nationality, and symptomatic status. Results: Ct values were found to be negatively and very weakly correlated with the fraction of daily positive cases in the population r = -0.06 (CI95%: -0.06; -0.05; p=0.001). The R-squared for the regression model (adjusting for age and number of daily tests) showed an accuracy of 45.3%. Ct Values showed an association with nationality (p=0.012). After the stratification, the association between Ct values and the fraction of daily positive cases was only maintained for the female gender and Bahraini-nationality. Symptomatic presentation was significantly associated with lower Ct values (higher viral loads). Ct values do not show any correlation with age (p=0.333) or gender (p=0.522). Conclusion: We report one of the first and largest studies to investigate the epidemiological associations of Ct values with COVID-19. Ct values offer a potentially simple and widely accessible tool to predict and model epidemiological dynamics on a population level. More population studies and predictive models from global cohorts are necessary.
RT-PCR Ct值与COVID-19每日新病例的关联:一项多中心横断面研究
导言:对病毒性疾病和COVID-19等疫情的流行病学动态进行主动预测,一直是科学家、公共卫生研究人员和政策制定者的一个难题。目前尚不清楚COVID-19(或任何其他病毒)的RT-PCR周期阈值(Ct)值作为病毒载量的指标是否可以代表人群水平上潜在流行病学变化的可能预测指标。目的:研究人群中SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Ct值随时间的变化是否与每日COVID-19阳性检测比例相关。此外,本研究还分析了可能影响RT-PCR Ct值的因素。方法:对2020年5月4日至2020年9月30日在巴林王国所有COVID-19设施中的63879例患者进行回顾性横断面研究。收集的数据包括检测次数、新诊断病例、Ct值、年龄、性别、国籍和症状状况。结果:Ct值与人群中每日阳性病例的比例呈极弱负相关r = -0.06 (CI95%: -0.06;-0.05;p = 0.001)。回归模型(调整年龄和每日测试次数)的r平方显示准确率为45.3%。Ct值显示与国籍相关(p=0.012)。分层后,Ct值与每日阳性病例比例之间的关联仅在女性和巴林国籍中维持。症状表现与较低的Ct值(较高的病毒载量)显著相关。Ct值与年龄(p=0.333)或性别(p=0.522)没有任何相关性。结论:我们报道了首个也是规模最大的Ct值与COVID-19流行病学相关性的研究之一。Ct值提供了一种潜在的简单和广泛可及的工具,用于在人口水平上预测和模拟流行病学动态。需要更多的人口研究和来自全球群体的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信