‘Is there anything more to professionalism than knowledge?’—relating theory and practice in a university-based institutionalisation of a third space for preservice teachers

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Eli Lejonberg, I. Hatlevik
{"title":"‘Is there anything more to professionalism than knowledge?’—relating theory and practice in a university-based institutionalisation of a third space for preservice teachers","authors":"Eli Lejonberg, I. Hatlevik","doi":"10.1080/13611267.2022.2127259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates practices that engage preservice teachers’ ideas of professionalism within the context of a university-based mentoring programme. The case is explored by observation of mentoring sessions, analysis of documents grounding the mentoring sessions, and mentor and mentee interviews. Practices are investigated through the theory of practice architectures and made the subject of a thematic analysis. The purpose of the investigation is to highlight how practices can contribute to enhancing preservice teachers’ understanding of different aspects of professionalism, particularly those related to expectations of teachers’ professional competence. The findings show how mentoring practices can contribute to widening preservice teachers’ understanding and how contextual factors, like power relations, can come into play in mentoring practices. The analyses illuminate how professionalism is being negotiated in a third space institutionalised in a campus-based mentor programme in teacher education. Highlights A mentor programme is understood as an institutionali mme is understood as an institutionalisation of a third space. Mentoring practices are studied in terms of practice architectures. Understanding of teacher professionalism is developed by relating theory and practice. Power relations are highlighted as essential for how mentoring practices play out.","PeriodicalId":46613,"journal":{"name":"MENTORING & TUTORING","volume":"16 1","pages":"606 - 633"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MENTORING & TUTORING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2127259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates practices that engage preservice teachers’ ideas of professionalism within the context of a university-based mentoring programme. The case is explored by observation of mentoring sessions, analysis of documents grounding the mentoring sessions, and mentor and mentee interviews. Practices are investigated through the theory of practice architectures and made the subject of a thematic analysis. The purpose of the investigation is to highlight how practices can contribute to enhancing preservice teachers’ understanding of different aspects of professionalism, particularly those related to expectations of teachers’ professional competence. The findings show how mentoring practices can contribute to widening preservice teachers’ understanding and how contextual factors, like power relations, can come into play in mentoring practices. The analyses illuminate how professionalism is being negotiated in a third space institutionalised in a campus-based mentor programme in teacher education. Highlights A mentor programme is understood as an institutionali mme is understood as an institutionalisation of a third space. Mentoring practices are studied in terms of practice architectures. Understanding of teacher professionalism is developed by relating theory and practice. Power relations are highlighted as essential for how mentoring practices play out.
“除了知识,还有什么比专业更重要的吗?”——以大学为基础的职前教师第三空间制度化的相关理论与实践
摘要:本文研究了在大学指导计划的背景下,从事职前教师专业主义思想的实践。通过对指导会议的观察、对指导会议基础文件的分析以及对导师和被指导者的访谈来探讨这个案例。实践通过实践体系结构的理论进行调查,并进行专题分析。调查的目的是强调实践如何有助于提高职前教师对专业精神的不同方面的理解,特别是与教师专业能力期望有关的方面。研究结果显示了师徒实践如何有助于扩大职前教师的理解,以及权力关系等背景因素如何在师徒实践中发挥作用。这些分析阐明了专业化是如何在第三个空间中进行谈判的,在教师教育中以校园为基础的导师计划中制度化。导师计划被理解为一个机构,而mme被理解为第三空间的制度化。指导实践是根据实践体系结构来研究的。对教师专业化的认识是在理论与实践的结合中发展起来的。权力关系被强调为指导实践如何发挥作用的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MENTORING & TUTORING
MENTORING & TUTORING EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信