Air Cooler Vibrations - Amplified Amplitudes, Simplified Solutions

I. A. Awadhi, Ashok Sharma, K. Subramaniam, Saleimah Al Zeyoudi
{"title":"Air Cooler Vibrations - Amplified Amplitudes, Simplified Solutions","authors":"I. A. Awadhi, Ashok Sharma, K. Subramaniam, Saleimah Al Zeyoudi","doi":"10.2118/197508-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n One of the largest Air-cooled steam condensers in our plant having 16 bays & 32 fans of 4.8m diameter, was observed with high vibrations beyond 100 mm/s, resulting in equipment integrity & HSE concerns. Most importantly, 250 MT/hr of steam has to be vented to atmosphere, if the air-cooler is down. This paper presents the alternate approach adopted which resolved vibration issue, enhanced availability & improved steam system efficiency, with simple but robust solution.\n \n \n \n Performed meticulous measurement of Aircooler vibration spectrum, which includes frequency, amplitude, velocity & structural natural frequency. As motor solo-run test confirmed no inherent vibration originating from motor, analysis was imperative to find the root cause. Hence, developed ANSYS model of existing Aircooler to simulate different modes & corresponding frequencies. Analysis confirmed that high vibration was a result of resonance between structure natural frequency and motor/blade pass frequency.\n \n \n \n The results from detailed study and analysis recommended that in order to eliminate the resonance criteria, number of fan blades has to be changed from 11 to 12 and enormous amount of additional structures / bay to be added to shift the structural frequency away from its natural frequency. Total estimated cost of execution for this option is ~1 million USD for all 16 bays and require aircooler shutdown.\n Instead of the above ceremonial solution, a simple and easy to implement, analytical solution was recommended to locally stiffen the motor & gearbox support plates. This would minimize the vibration amplitude, reduce fatigue loading and enhance structural rigidity & integrity. The cost of this option is negligible as the modification does not involve major changes and can be executed with in-house resources. Primarily, this option can be executed without the need for Aircooler shutdown.\n The alternate solution has been implemented and the vibration levels have reduced considerably, ensuring aircooler Integrity. Most importantly, this approach has improved aircooler availability and avoided venting of 250T/hr of LP steam, costing ~24K USD/day.\n \n \n \n Vibrations in aircoolers not only causes HSE & integrity concerns but their unavailability leads to steam letting off. The detailed analysis and robust solution has not only improved integrity, but also avoided huge structural modification & associated cost, improved availability, eliminated steam letting down and thus enhancing steam system efficiency.\n","PeriodicalId":11091,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197508-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the largest Air-cooled steam condensers in our plant having 16 bays & 32 fans of 4.8m diameter, was observed with high vibrations beyond 100 mm/s, resulting in equipment integrity & HSE concerns. Most importantly, 250 MT/hr of steam has to be vented to atmosphere, if the air-cooler is down. This paper presents the alternate approach adopted which resolved vibration issue, enhanced availability & improved steam system efficiency, with simple but robust solution. Performed meticulous measurement of Aircooler vibration spectrum, which includes frequency, amplitude, velocity & structural natural frequency. As motor solo-run test confirmed no inherent vibration originating from motor, analysis was imperative to find the root cause. Hence, developed ANSYS model of existing Aircooler to simulate different modes & corresponding frequencies. Analysis confirmed that high vibration was a result of resonance between structure natural frequency and motor/blade pass frequency. The results from detailed study and analysis recommended that in order to eliminate the resonance criteria, number of fan blades has to be changed from 11 to 12 and enormous amount of additional structures / bay to be added to shift the structural frequency away from its natural frequency. Total estimated cost of execution for this option is ~1 million USD for all 16 bays and require aircooler shutdown. Instead of the above ceremonial solution, a simple and easy to implement, analytical solution was recommended to locally stiffen the motor & gearbox support plates. This would minimize the vibration amplitude, reduce fatigue loading and enhance structural rigidity & integrity. The cost of this option is negligible as the modification does not involve major changes and can be executed with in-house resources. Primarily, this option can be executed without the need for Aircooler shutdown. The alternate solution has been implemented and the vibration levels have reduced considerably, ensuring aircooler Integrity. Most importantly, this approach has improved aircooler availability and avoided venting of 250T/hr of LP steam, costing ~24K USD/day. Vibrations in aircoolers not only causes HSE & integrity concerns but their unavailability leads to steam letting off. The detailed analysis and robust solution has not only improved integrity, but also avoided huge structural modification & associated cost, improved availability, eliminated steam letting down and thus enhancing steam system efficiency.
空气冷却器振动-放大振幅,简化解决方案
我们工厂最大的风冷蒸汽冷凝器之一,有16个隔板和32个直径4.8米的风扇,观察到超过100毫米/秒的高振动,导致设备完整性和HSE问题。最重要的是,如果空气冷却器关闭,250吨/小时的蒸汽必须排放到大气中。本文介绍了解决振动问题、提高可用性和提高蒸汽系统效率的替代方法,该方法简单而可靠。对空气冷却器的振动谱进行了细致的测量,包括频率、振幅、速度和结构固有频率。由于电机单独运行试验证实电机没有固有振动,因此分析找出根本原因势在必行。为此,开发了现有空冷器的ANSYS模型,对不同的模态及对应的频率进行仿真。分析证实,高振动是结构固有频率与电机/叶片通过频率共振的结果。详细的研究和分析结果表明,为了消除共振准则,必须将风扇叶片的数量从11个改为12个,并增加大量的附加结构/舱,以使结构频率偏离其固有频率。该方案的总执行成本估计约为100万美元,所有16个托架都需要关闭空气冷却器。代替上述礼仪解决方案,一个简单和易于实施,分析解决方案被推荐局部加强电机和变速箱支撑板。这将使振动幅度最小化,减少疲劳载荷,提高结构刚度和完整性。此选项的成本可以忽略不计,因为修改不涉及重大更改,并且可以使用内部资源执行。首先,该选项可以在不需要关闭空气冷却器的情况下执行。替代解决方案已经实施,振动水平大大降低,确保了空气冷却器的完整性。最重要的是,这种方法提高了空气冷却器的可用性,避免了250吨/小时的低压蒸汽排放,每天的成本约为24K美元。空气冷却器的振动不仅会引起HSE和完整性问题,而且它们的不可用性还会导致蒸汽泄漏。详细的分析和可靠的解决方案不仅提高了系统的完整性,而且避免了巨大的结构改造和相关成本,提高了可用性,消除了蒸汽泄放,从而提高了蒸汽系统的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信