Rethinking Graduate School Research Genres: Communicating With Industry, Writing to Learn

Julie Watts
{"title":"Rethinking Graduate School Research Genres: Communicating With Industry, Writing to Learn","authors":"Julie Watts","doi":"10.1177/0047281620981568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical and professional communication master’s students work with a faculty advisor to complete a three-credit independent research (IR) project, featuring original research. Stakeholders recommended the IR thesis be revised to better communicate IR to industry. Using a writing, activity theory, and genre theory lens, I analyzed what contradictions emerged between academic and workplace activity systems as stakeholders recommended genre revisions. I analyzed faculty and professional advisory board meeting transcripts, alumni and student surveys, and a Graduate School director and thesis examiner interview. Results indicated the thesis’ spectrum of functions, from its strengths encouraging students’ research proficiency to the limiting way it showcases IR as a product, not a process. Stakeholders suggested no thesis changes but recommended IR genre system modifications. As agents of change, students are uniquely positioned to use the IR genre system to address workplace communication problems and help mend our discipline’s academia-industry divide.","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"40 1","pages":"313 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620981568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Technical and professional communication master’s students work with a faculty advisor to complete a three-credit independent research (IR) project, featuring original research. Stakeholders recommended the IR thesis be revised to better communicate IR to industry. Using a writing, activity theory, and genre theory lens, I analyzed what contradictions emerged between academic and workplace activity systems as stakeholders recommended genre revisions. I analyzed faculty and professional advisory board meeting transcripts, alumni and student surveys, and a Graduate School director and thesis examiner interview. Results indicated the thesis’ spectrum of functions, from its strengths encouraging students’ research proficiency to the limiting way it showcases IR as a product, not a process. Stakeholders suggested no thesis changes but recommended IR genre system modifications. As agents of change, students are uniquely positioned to use the IR genre system to address workplace communication problems and help mend our discipline’s academia-industry divide.
重新思考研究生院的研究类型:与行业沟通,写作学习
技术和专业传播硕士生与指导教师一起完成一个三学分的独立研究(IR)项目,以原创研究为特色。利益相关者建议修订IR论文,以便更好地与行业沟通IR。利用写作、活动理论和类型理论的视角,我分析了在利益相关者建议修改类型时,学术活动系统和工作场所活动系统之间出现的矛盾。我分析了教师和专业顾问委员会会议记录、校友和学生调查,以及研究生院院长和论文审稿人的采访。结果显示了论文的功能范围,从其鼓励学生研究熟练程度的优势到它将IR作为产品而不是过程展示的有限方式。利益相关者建议不修改论文,但建议修改IR类型系统。作为变革的推动者,学生们在使用IR类型系统解决工作场所沟通问题和帮助修复我们学科的学术-行业鸿沟方面处于独特的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信