Mechanical Response of a Cemented Soil over a Wide Range of Porosities and Cement Contents

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Hugo Carlos Scheuermann Filho, N. Consoli
{"title":"Mechanical Response of a Cemented Soil over a Wide Range of Porosities and Cement Contents","authors":"Hugo Carlos Scheuermann Filho, N. Consoli","doi":"10.1680/jgrim.22.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adjusted porosity/cement index η/(Civ)a has been showing its usefulness in modelling the strength and stiffness of a variety of artificially cemented soils as it encompasses into a single parameter both the influences of the compactness and of the cement content. That being so, it is theoretically possible to obtain the same mechanical response by establishing a specific η/(Civ)a value, which could be attained by several combinations of porosities and cement contents. Yet, this has not been verified over a wide spectrum of different dosages molded at the same η/(Civ)a value, especially for stiffness data. As a reason, present study addresses this issue by assessing the initial shear modulus and the unconfined compression of different dosages of an artificially cemented soil considering seven η/(Civ)avalues. A minimum of three mix designs were molded within each η/(Civ)a and five specimens were tested for each dosage. Both the stiffness and the strength results were evaluated through Tukey's multiple comparisons tests aiming to check for statistical equivalence of the obtained results within the same η/(Civ)a value. The tests results have revealed statistical differences amongst some dosages assembled with the same adjusted porosity/cement index value. Yet, both the stiffness and the strength outcomes were properly correlated to the η/(Civ)a index, yielding power-type relationships presenting great coefficients of determination.","PeriodicalId":51705,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.22.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The adjusted porosity/cement index η/(Civ)a has been showing its usefulness in modelling the strength and stiffness of a variety of artificially cemented soils as it encompasses into a single parameter both the influences of the compactness and of the cement content. That being so, it is theoretically possible to obtain the same mechanical response by establishing a specific η/(Civ)a value, which could be attained by several combinations of porosities and cement contents. Yet, this has not been verified over a wide spectrum of different dosages molded at the same η/(Civ)a value, especially for stiffness data. As a reason, present study addresses this issue by assessing the initial shear modulus and the unconfined compression of different dosages of an artificially cemented soil considering seven η/(Civ)avalues. A minimum of three mix designs were molded within each η/(Civ)a and five specimens were tested for each dosage. Both the stiffness and the strength results were evaluated through Tukey's multiple comparisons tests aiming to check for statistical equivalence of the obtained results within the same η/(Civ)a value. The tests results have revealed statistical differences amongst some dosages assembled with the same adjusted porosity/cement index value. Yet, both the stiffness and the strength outcomes were properly correlated to the η/(Civ)a index, yielding power-type relationships presenting great coefficients of determination.
大孔隙率和水泥掺量条件下水泥土的力学响应
调整孔隙率/水泥指数η/(Civ)a在模拟各种人工胶结土的强度和刚度方面已经显示出它的实用性,因为它将密实度和水泥含量的影响都包含在一个参数中。因此,理论上可以通过确定特定的η/(Civ)a值来获得相同的力学响应,该值可以通过孔隙率和水泥含量的几种组合来获得。然而,这还没有在相同η/(Civ)a值下的不同剂量的广泛范围内得到验证,特别是对于刚度数据。因此,本研究通过考虑7个η/(Civ)值,评估不同剂量人工胶结土的初始剪切模量和无侧限压缩来解决这一问题。在每个η/(Civ) A内至少成型三种混合设计,每种剂量测试五个样品。通过Tukey的多重比较试验对刚度和强度结果进行了评估,旨在检查在相同的η/(Civ)a值内获得的结果是否具有统计等效性。试验结果显示,具有相同调整孔隙度/胶结指标值的组合剂量之间存在统计学差异。然而,刚度和强度结果都与η/(Civ)a指数有适当的相关性,产生具有很大决定系数的幂型关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Ground Improvement provides a fast-track vehicle for the dissemination of news in technological developments, feasibility studies and innovative engineering applications for all aspects of ground improvement, ground reinforcement and grouting. The journal publishes high-quality, practical papers relevant to engineers, specialist contractors and academics involved in the development, design, construction, monitoring and quality control aspects of ground improvement. It covers a wide range of civil and environmental engineering applications, including analytical advances, performance evaluations, pilot and model studies, instrumented case-histories and innovative applications of existing technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信