Clinical effectiveness evaluation of laser therapy and dry needling in treatment of patients with myofascial pain in masseter muscle

D. A. Oliveira, R. Pinto, L. Reis, I. Dias, I. Leite, F. Leite
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness evaluation of laser therapy and dry needling in treatment of patients with myofascial pain in masseter muscle","authors":"D. A. Oliveira, R. Pinto, L. Reis, I. Dias, I. Leite, F. Leite","doi":"10.52010/ijom.2018.44.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myofascial pain is considered a type of muscular TMD, being common in patients with musculoskeletal pain associated with active or latent trigger points. Among the therapeutic options, there are low-intensity laser therapy and dry needling. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of these two therapies in the masseter muscles of patients with myofascial pain. Ten patients diagnosed with myofascial pain, with or without limitation of mouth opening, were randomly divided into two groups for treatment with low intensity laser therapy (G1) (n = 5) or dry needling (G2) (n = 5). The pain symptomatology and the mouth opening measurement were evaluated weekly before the start of treatment, and one week after the final treatment. The comparison between G1 and G2 in relation to the improvement in mouth opening was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). However, dry needling (G2) has shown numerically to be more effective than laser therapy in a shorter period comparing initial and final mouth opening. Regarding the pain symptomatology, both therapies were effective comparing the initial and final evaluations of patients with myofascial pain (p <0.05).","PeriodicalId":77635,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2018.44.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Myofascial pain is considered a type of muscular TMD, being common in patients with musculoskeletal pain associated with active or latent trigger points. Among the therapeutic options, there are low-intensity laser therapy and dry needling. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of these two therapies in the masseter muscles of patients with myofascial pain. Ten patients diagnosed with myofascial pain, with or without limitation of mouth opening, were randomly divided into two groups for treatment with low intensity laser therapy (G1) (n = 5) or dry needling (G2) (n = 5). The pain symptomatology and the mouth opening measurement were evaluated weekly before the start of treatment, and one week after the final treatment. The comparison between G1 and G2 in relation to the improvement in mouth opening was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). However, dry needling (G2) has shown numerically to be more effective than laser therapy in a shorter period comparing initial and final mouth opening. Regarding the pain symptomatology, both therapies were effective comparing the initial and final evaluations of patients with myofascial pain (p <0.05).
激光联合干针治疗咬肌肌筋膜痛的临床疗效评价
肌筋膜疼痛被认为是一种肌肉性TMD,常见于与活动或潜在触发点相关的肌肉骨骼疼痛患者。在治疗选择中,有低强度激光治疗和干针治疗。本研究的目的是比较这两种疗法对肌筋膜疼痛患者咬肌的疗效。将10例确诊为肌筋膜疼痛,伴有或不伴有开口限制的患者随机分为两组,分别采用低强度激光治疗(G1) (n = 5)和干针治疗(G2) (n = 5)。治疗开始前和结束治疗后一周分别评估疼痛症状和开口测量。G1组与G2组的张口改善情况比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,在数值上,干针(G2)在较短的时间内比激光治疗更有效,比较了初始和最终的开口。在疼痛症状方面,两种疗法对肌筋膜疼痛患者的初始和最终评估比较均有效(p <0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信