Food and governance on the frontiers of colonial Australia and Canada's North West Territories

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
A. Nettelbeck, R. Foster
{"title":"Food and governance on the frontiers of colonial Australia and Canada's North West Territories","authors":"A. Nettelbeck, R. Foster","doi":"10.22459/AH.36.2013.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades historians have been turning from a national towards a transnational framework to examine the patterns and processes of colonial governance. This paper aims to contribute to those debates by examining the roles and outcomes of ration distribution as an institutionalised tool of Aboriginal governance on the nineteenth century settler frontiers of colonial Australia and north-west Canada. In so doing it is not our aim to rehearse established scholarship on the history of rations policy in specific times and localities,2 but to consider the degree to which the evolution of rationing policies reflects shared administrative goals and dilemmas in Aboriginal governance across different colonial contexts. To date, there has been little attention to the role of rationing policy across Australia's colonies, let alone in comparison with other jurisdictions of British settlement. In some key respects, Australia from the 1840s and western Canada from the 1870s represent two ends of a spectrum in shared colonial policy across British settler colonies. On the one hand, they shared a set of similarities in the issues and problems their governments faced with the rapid expansion of settlement after the mid-nineteenth century, of securing Aboriginal people's amenability to British rule, and of approaching the management of Aboriginal populations through a mixture of conciliatory and coercive measures. On the other hand, administrative approaches to Aboriginal peoples in these two jurisdictions evolved in light of some crucial differences.","PeriodicalId":42397,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal History","volume":"32 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.36.2013.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In recent decades historians have been turning from a national towards a transnational framework to examine the patterns and processes of colonial governance. This paper aims to contribute to those debates by examining the roles and outcomes of ration distribution as an institutionalised tool of Aboriginal governance on the nineteenth century settler frontiers of colonial Australia and north-west Canada. In so doing it is not our aim to rehearse established scholarship on the history of rations policy in specific times and localities,2 but to consider the degree to which the evolution of rationing policies reflects shared administrative goals and dilemmas in Aboriginal governance across different colonial contexts. To date, there has been little attention to the role of rationing policy across Australia's colonies, let alone in comparison with other jurisdictions of British settlement. In some key respects, Australia from the 1840s and western Canada from the 1870s represent two ends of a spectrum in shared colonial policy across British settler colonies. On the one hand, they shared a set of similarities in the issues and problems their governments faced with the rapid expansion of settlement after the mid-nineteenth century, of securing Aboriginal people's amenability to British rule, and of approaching the management of Aboriginal populations through a mixture of conciliatory and coercive measures. On the other hand, administrative approaches to Aboriginal peoples in these two jurisdictions evolved in light of some crucial differences.
澳大利亚殖民地和加拿大西北地区边境的食物和治理
近几十年来,历史学家一直在从国家框架转向跨国框架来研究殖民统治的模式和过程。本文旨在通过研究配给分配作为19世纪殖民地澳大利亚和加拿大西北部定居者边界上土著治理的制度化工具的作用和结果,为这些辩论做出贡献。在这样做的过程中,我们的目的并不是重述特定时期和地区的口粮政策历史,而是考虑在不同殖民背景下,口粮政策的演变在多大程度上反映了共同的行政目标和土著治理的困境。迄今为止,很少有人关注配给政策在澳大利亚殖民地的作用,更不用说与英国殖民的其他司法管辖区进行比较了。在一些关键方面,19世纪40年代的澳大利亚和19世纪70年代的加拿大西部代表了英国殖民殖民地共同殖民政策的两个极端。一方面,他们的政府在19世纪中叶之后迅速扩张的定居点,确保土著人民对英国统治的顺从,以及通过和解和强制措施的混合来接近土著人口的管理方面面临着一系列相似的问题和问题。另一方面,这两个司法管辖区对土著人民的行政管理办法由于一些关键的差异而演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信