Feasibility of Modifying Existing Chemistry Demonstrations by Using Substitute Materials

KIMIKA Pub Date : 2020-09-11 DOI:10.26534/kimika.v31i2.55-61
Dane Mykel M. Quiambao, A. Guidote, Rhodora F. Nicdao
{"title":"Feasibility of Modifying Existing Chemistry Demonstrations by Using Substitute Materials","authors":"Dane Mykel M. Quiambao, A. Guidote, Rhodora F. Nicdao","doi":"10.26534/kimika.v31i2.55-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to reiterate the use of Chemistry demonstrations as effective teaching tools to students while addressing some of its drawbacks, which discourages teachers from doing them such as cost and safety. Four chosen existing Chemistry demonstrations (Blue Bottle Experiment, Copper Sulfate Experiment, Blown Away, Dancing Flames) were modified by using substitute reagents, which are more accessible, relatively safer, and at lower cost. These demonstrations were chosen based on how easily the substitute reagents will be obtained. Afterwards, with the permission of a private junior high school, they were presented to a group of Grade 9 students of their choosing. The students were asked to evaluate each demonstration using a Likert scale-based questionnaire. This questionnaire rates each demonstration in terms of aesthetics, the materials and procedure done, effectiveness to explain certain Chemistry topics, safety, and the students’ overall judgment regarding the use of demonstrations as teaching tools. By converting their evaluation to quantitative values, the demonstrations scored high in all major categories. With this, it is highly recommended to explore other Chemistry demonstrations for possible modifications, which can be integrated in lecture classes.","PeriodicalId":17914,"journal":{"name":"KIMIKA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KIMIKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26534/kimika.v31i2.55-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to reiterate the use of Chemistry demonstrations as effective teaching tools to students while addressing some of its drawbacks, which discourages teachers from doing them such as cost and safety. Four chosen existing Chemistry demonstrations (Blue Bottle Experiment, Copper Sulfate Experiment, Blown Away, Dancing Flames) were modified by using substitute reagents, which are more accessible, relatively safer, and at lower cost. These demonstrations were chosen based on how easily the substitute reagents will be obtained. Afterwards, with the permission of a private junior high school, they were presented to a group of Grade 9 students of their choosing. The students were asked to evaluate each demonstration using a Likert scale-based questionnaire. This questionnaire rates each demonstration in terms of aesthetics, the materials and procedure done, effectiveness to explain certain Chemistry topics, safety, and the students’ overall judgment regarding the use of demonstrations as teaching tools. By converting their evaluation to quantitative values, the demonstrations scored high in all major categories. With this, it is highly recommended to explore other Chemistry demonstrations for possible modifications, which can be integrated in lecture classes.
用替代材料修饰现有化学演示的可行性
本研究旨在重申化学演示作为有效的教学工具对学生的使用,同时解决其一些缺点,如成本和安全等阻碍教师这样做。选择现有的四个化学演示(蓝瓶实验、硫酸铜实验、吹散实验、舞动的火焰实验),通过使用替代试剂进行修饰,替代试剂更容易获得,相对更安全,成本更低。这些示范的选择是基于如何容易获得替代试剂。之后,在一所私立初中的允许下,他们被介绍给一群他们选择的九年级学生。学生们被要求使用李克特量表评估每个演示。该问卷从美学、材料和程序、解释某些化学主题的有效性、安全性以及学生对使用演示作为教学工具的总体判断等方面对每个演示进行评分。通过将其评价转换为定量值,这些示范在所有主要类别中得分都很高。在此基础上,强烈建议探索其他化学演示以进行可能的修改,这些演示可以整合到课堂中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信