PUBLIC WORK IN AN INTERNATIONAL AND HUNGARIAN CONTEXT

Imola Cseh Papp, Erika Varga, L. Schwarczová, L. Hajós
{"title":"PUBLIC WORK IN AN INTERNATIONAL AND HUNGARIAN CONTEXT","authors":"Imola Cseh Papp, Erika Varga, L. Schwarczová, L. Hajós","doi":"10.33382/cejllpm.2018.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of active labour market policies (providing labour market services and supporting employment) is to channel back those without a job to the labour market as soon as possible. Public work, regarded as an active instrument, is generally criticised for not substantially improving employment rate; most jobs produce low added value; participation decreases the motivation and willingness of those concerned to find a job. In addition, the programmes prove to be expensive and make people more dependent on the unemployment benefit. According to the experts one of the benefits is that in the short and medium term the programmes provide the safety of survival to the participants and can also contribute to implementing the other tasks of improvement while decreasing poverty and inequalities. Another beneficial impact is its suitability to make the disadvantaged groups more dynamic whose primary labour integration is unlikely. It is also suitable for overcoming the challenges of structural unemployment and easing the downsides of global economic crises. The public work programmes are facing similar challenges internationally and in Hungary, as well. Our paper presents the problems of public work (if it is effective enough and able to fulfil its mission) as one of the most frequently applied instruments of employment policies both theoretically and empirically, and also from an international as well as a Hungarian perspective.","PeriodicalId":34158,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33382/cejllpm.2018.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The objective of active labour market policies (providing labour market services and supporting employment) is to channel back those without a job to the labour market as soon as possible. Public work, regarded as an active instrument, is generally criticised for not substantially improving employment rate; most jobs produce low added value; participation decreases the motivation and willingness of those concerned to find a job. In addition, the programmes prove to be expensive and make people more dependent on the unemployment benefit. According to the experts one of the benefits is that in the short and medium term the programmes provide the safety of survival to the participants and can also contribute to implementing the other tasks of improvement while decreasing poverty and inequalities. Another beneficial impact is its suitability to make the disadvantaged groups more dynamic whose primary labour integration is unlikely. It is also suitable for overcoming the challenges of structural unemployment and easing the downsides of global economic crises. The public work programmes are facing similar challenges internationally and in Hungary, as well. Our paper presents the problems of public work (if it is effective enough and able to fulfil its mission) as one of the most frequently applied instruments of employment policies both theoretically and empirically, and also from an international as well as a Hungarian perspective.
国际和匈牙利背景下的公共工作
积极的劳动力市场政策(提供劳动力市场服务和支持就业)的目标是使失业者尽快回到劳动力市场。公共工程被视为一种积极的工具,但普遍被批评没有大幅提高就业率;大多数工作的附加值很低;参与降低了相关人员找工作的动机和意愿。此外,这些计划被证明是昂贵的,使人们更加依赖失业救济金。专家们认为,其中一个好处是,在短期和中期,这些方案为参与者提供了生存的安全,并有助于执行在减少贫穷和不平等的同时进行改进的其他任务。另一个有益的影响是,它适合使初级劳动一体化不太可能的处境不利群体更有活力。它也适用于克服结构性失业的挑战,缓解全球经济危机的负面影响。公共工作方案在国际上和匈牙利也面临着类似的挑战。我们的论文提出了公共工作的问题(如果它足够有效并能够履行其使命)作为就业政策最常用的工具之一,从理论上和经验上,也从国际和匈牙利的角度来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信