Study of comparison of acute toxicities between sequential intensity-modulated radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head-and-neck cancers

Lanisha Sequeira, S. Shankar, Sandesh Rao, D. Fernandes, T. Jacob, H. Krishnaraj
{"title":"Study of comparison of acute toxicities between sequential intensity-modulated radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head-and-neck cancers","authors":"Lanisha Sequeira, S. Shankar, Sandesh Rao, D. Fernandes, T. Jacob, H. Krishnaraj","doi":"10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_48_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the acute toxicities between sequential intensity-modulated radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head-and-neck cancers using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck at the department of radiotherapy (RT), from December 2018 to July 2020, were taken up for this study. Patients were divided into sequential intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) arm and SIB-IMRT arm. Patients treated with sequential IMRT were treated so as to receive a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 2 Gy/fractions, 5 fractions per week – 70 Gy in 35 fractions to the primary tumor, 66 Gy in 33 fractions to high-risk clinical target volume (CTV1), 60 Gy in 30 fractions to high-risk CTV2 and 50 Gy in 25 fractions to elective nodes/low-risk CTV3. Patients treated with SIB-IMRT were treated so as to receive a total dose of 66 Gy in 30 fractions – 2.2 Gy/fraction to gross tumor volume/PTV 66, 60 Gy in 30 fractions – 2.0 Gy/fraction to high-risk nodes (PTV 60), 54 Gy in 30 fractions – 1.8 Gy/fraction to elective nodes (PTV 54), respectively. Patients received concurrent chemotherapy with weekly injections cisplatin (35mg/m2) or injection carboplatin (AUC 2). Toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v 4.03. Results: Higher grades of radiation-induced dermatitis and mucositis were observed in patients in SIB-IMRT. No patients experienced Grade 4 toxicity. The results confirm that irradiation according to our SIB-IMRT protocol is a treatment option with acceptable toxicity. Conclusion: SIB-IMRT is feasible, although associated with increased rates of skin and mucosal toxicity.","PeriodicalId":16923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"116 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_48_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the acute toxicities between sequential intensity-modulated radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head-and-neck cancers using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck at the department of radiotherapy (RT), from December 2018 to July 2020, were taken up for this study. Patients were divided into sequential intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) arm and SIB-IMRT arm. Patients treated with sequential IMRT were treated so as to receive a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 2 Gy/fractions, 5 fractions per week – 70 Gy in 35 fractions to the primary tumor, 66 Gy in 33 fractions to high-risk clinical target volume (CTV1), 60 Gy in 30 fractions to high-risk CTV2 and 50 Gy in 25 fractions to elective nodes/low-risk CTV3. Patients treated with SIB-IMRT were treated so as to receive a total dose of 66 Gy in 30 fractions – 2.2 Gy/fraction to gross tumor volume/PTV 66, 60 Gy in 30 fractions – 2.0 Gy/fraction to high-risk nodes (PTV 60), 54 Gy in 30 fractions – 1.8 Gy/fraction to elective nodes (PTV 54), respectively. Patients received concurrent chemotherapy with weekly injections cisplatin (35mg/m2) or injection carboplatin (AUC 2). Toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v 4.03. Results: Higher grades of radiation-induced dermatitis and mucositis were observed in patients in SIB-IMRT. No patients experienced Grade 4 toxicity. The results confirm that irradiation according to our SIB-IMRT protocol is a treatment option with acceptable toxicity. Conclusion: SIB-IMRT is feasible, although associated with increased rates of skin and mucosal toxicity.
序贯调强放疗与同步综合增强调强放疗对头颈癌急性毒性的比较研究
目的:本研究的目的是使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE) 4.03版,评估和比较序次调强放疗和同时综合增强(SIB)调强放疗对头颈部癌症的急性毒性。材料与方法:选取2018年12月至2020年7月在放疗科(RT)经组织学证实的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者为研究对象。患者被分为顺序调强放疗(IMRT)组和sibb -IMRT组。接受序贯IMRT治疗的患者接受的总剂量为70 Gy,分35组、2 Gy/组、5组/周,其中原发肿瘤35组70 Gy,高危临床靶体积(CTV1) 33组66 Gy,高危CTV2 30组60 Gy,择期淋巴结/低危CTV3 25组50 Gy。接受sibb - imrt治疗的患者接受的总剂量为66 Gy,分为30个部分- 2.2 Gy/分数到总肿瘤体积/PTV 66, 60 Gy分为30个部分- 2.0 Gy/分数到高危淋巴结(PTV 60), 54 Gy分为30个部分- 1.8 Gy/分数到选择性淋巴结(PTV 54)。患者同时接受化疗,每周注射顺铂(35mg/m2)或注射卡铂(AUC 2)。使用CTCAE v 4.03评估毒性。结果:在接受sibb - imrt治疗的患者中观察到更高级别的放射性皮炎和粘膜炎。没有患者出现4级毒性。结果证实,根据我们的sibb - imrt方案照射是一种毒性可接受的治疗选择。结论:sibb - imrt是可行的,尽管会增加皮肤和粘膜毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信