Do Size and Origin Matter? Evidence from the Banking Market of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Q3 Social Sciences
Deni Memic, Nedim Memic, Sanela Pasic
{"title":"Do Size and Origin Matter? Evidence from the Banking Market of Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"Deni Memic, Nedim Memic, Sanela Pasic","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS16616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)Literature ReviewBanking market has been research area of interest in the previous period. Banks and their behaviour are analysed frequently in order to investigate patterns and trends that determine their profitability, efficiency and other financial indicators.The latest financial crisis has significantly affected the banking sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina causing stagnation within the sector, increase of risk costs and consecutively decrease of profitability. Despite of these global financial changes, the results within the sector vary to a great extent from bank to bank. The banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina is in majority foreign private ownership and is characterized by domination of large foreign banks. It is also highly decentralized as two separate banking markets exist in each of the two constitutional entities, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska. Banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina is fairly unexplored area, only an insignificant number of research has been conducted using data from Bosnia and Herzegovina. This research includes prediction credit default in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Memi. and Rov.anin, 2012) and assessing credit default on the banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina using several statistical methods (Memi., 2015).Observing such diversified, decentralized and inhomogeneous banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina arises many unanswered questions: are large banks better than small banks and are foreign owned banks better than locally owned banks? Answering such questions may indicate whether the decisions to transfer most of the Bosnian banking market from the local to foreign ownership, was a quality one. Furthermore, it may indicate whether small or large banks exhibit better performance.The main purpose of this study is to compare and discriminate banks of different size and ownership origin in Bosnia and Herzegovina or in other words, analyse different financial ratios of banks in Bosnia and Herzegovina controlling for bank size and ownership origin.To our knowledge no major research has been conducted and published on the banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina apart from the study by Memi. and .kalji.-Memi. (2013) that assessed the efficiency scores for each bank which served as a basis for further comparisons between the banks in the period between 2008 and 2010. In this research banks were also compared based on their size and location. The results of this research have shown that individual bank efficiency varies 62 Journal of Economic and Social Studies throughout the observed period and that not all of the banks were part of the negative banking sector trend induced by the crisis. The study showed no significant difference between the performances of banks in different Bosnia and Herzegovina entities, nor between smaller and larger banks. The main reasons for lack of relevant research on the banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina may lay in the lack of data availability data, insignificant market size in global banking proportions and lack of research funds.Globally, many different studies aimed at assessing banking market from the size, ownership, market structure, lending behaviour have been conducted. One of the studies by Micco and Panizza (2004) examines whether bank ownership is correlated with bank lending behaviour over the business cycle using multi-country data. The study has shown that state-owned banks play a useful credit-smoothing role as their lending is less responsive to macroeconomic shocks than the lending of private banks.Uchida, Udell, and Watanabe (2007) studied banking sector in a way to determine whether small banks have a comparative advantage in processing softinformation and delivering relationship lending on a unique Japanese data set. The results of this study suggest that large banks usually borrow to larger firms, as well as that large banks do not necessarily have a comparative advantage in extending transactions-based lending. …","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS16616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)Literature ReviewBanking market has been research area of interest in the previous period. Banks and their behaviour are analysed frequently in order to investigate patterns and trends that determine their profitability, efficiency and other financial indicators.The latest financial crisis has significantly affected the banking sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina causing stagnation within the sector, increase of risk costs and consecutively decrease of profitability. Despite of these global financial changes, the results within the sector vary to a great extent from bank to bank. The banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina is in majority foreign private ownership and is characterized by domination of large foreign banks. It is also highly decentralized as two separate banking markets exist in each of the two constitutional entities, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska. Banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina is fairly unexplored area, only an insignificant number of research has been conducted using data from Bosnia and Herzegovina. This research includes prediction credit default in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Memi. and Rov.anin, 2012) and assessing credit default on the banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina using several statistical methods (Memi., 2015).Observing such diversified, decentralized and inhomogeneous banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina arises many unanswered questions: are large banks better than small banks and are foreign owned banks better than locally owned banks? Answering such questions may indicate whether the decisions to transfer most of the Bosnian banking market from the local to foreign ownership, was a quality one. Furthermore, it may indicate whether small or large banks exhibit better performance.The main purpose of this study is to compare and discriminate banks of different size and ownership origin in Bosnia and Herzegovina or in other words, analyse different financial ratios of banks in Bosnia and Herzegovina controlling for bank size and ownership origin.To our knowledge no major research has been conducted and published on the banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina apart from the study by Memi. and .kalji.-Memi. (2013) that assessed the efficiency scores for each bank which served as a basis for further comparisons between the banks in the period between 2008 and 2010. In this research banks were also compared based on their size and location. The results of this research have shown that individual bank efficiency varies 62 Journal of Economic and Social Studies throughout the observed period and that not all of the banks were part of the negative banking sector trend induced by the crisis. The study showed no significant difference between the performances of banks in different Bosnia and Herzegovina entities, nor between smaller and larger banks. The main reasons for lack of relevant research on the banking market of Bosnia and Herzegovina may lay in the lack of data availability data, insignificant market size in global banking proportions and lack of research funds.Globally, many different studies aimed at assessing banking market from the size, ownership, market structure, lending behaviour have been conducted. One of the studies by Micco and Panizza (2004) examines whether bank ownership is correlated with bank lending behaviour over the business cycle using multi-country data. The study has shown that state-owned banks play a useful credit-smoothing role as their lending is less responsive to macroeconomic shocks than the lending of private banks.Uchida, Udell, and Watanabe (2007) studied banking sector in a way to determine whether small banks have a comparative advantage in processing softinformation and delivering relationship lending on a unique Japanese data set. The results of this study suggest that large banks usually borrow to larger firms, as well as that large banks do not necessarily have a comparative advantage in extending transactions-based lending. …
尺寸和产地重要吗?来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那银行市场的证据
(ProQuest:……表示省略公式。)文献综述银行市场在过去的一段时间里一直是人们关注的研究领域。银行及其行为经常被分析,以便调查决定其盈利能力、效率和其他财务指标的模式和趋势。最近的金融危机严重影响了波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的银行部门,造成该部门停滞不前,风险成本增加,盈利能力不断下降。尽管存在这些全球金融变化,但各银行之间的结果在很大程度上是不同的。波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的银行市场多数为外国私人所有,其特点是大型外国银行占主导地位。它也是高度分散的,因为两个独立的银行市场分别存在于波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那联邦和斯普斯卡共和国这两个宪法实体中。波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的银行市场是一个相当未开发的领域,只有少量的研究使用了波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的数据。本研究包括对波黑联邦信用违约的预测。和Rov。anin, 2012),并使用几种统计方法评估波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那银行市场的信用违约(Memi。, 2015)。观察波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那这种多样化、分散化和不均匀的银行市场,产生了许多悬而未决的问题:大银行比小银行好吗,外资银行比本地银行好吗?回答这些问题可能表明将波斯尼亚银行市场的大部分所有权从当地转移到外国所有权的决定是否有质量。此外,它还可以表明是小型银行表现更好还是大型银行表现更好。本研究的主要目的是比较和区分波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那不同规模和所有权来源的银行,换句话说,分析波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那银行控制银行规模和所有权来源的不同财务比率。据我们所知,除了Memi的研究外,还没有对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的银行市场进行过重大研究并发表过。和.kalji.-Memi。(2013)评估了每家银行的效率得分,作为2008年至2010年期间银行之间进一步比较的基础。在这项研究中,银行也根据其规模和位置进行了比较。这项研究的结果表明,在整个观察期间,个别银行的效率各不相同,并不是所有的银行都是由危机引起的银行业负面趋势的一部分。研究表明,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那不同实体的银行绩效之间没有显著差异,小型银行和大型银行之间也没有显著差异。波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那银行市场缺乏相关研究的主要原因可能是缺乏数据可用性数据,市场规模在全球银行业中所占比例不高,缺乏研究资金。在全球范围内,已经进行了许多不同的研究,旨在从规模、所有权、市场结构、贷款行为等方面评估银行市场。Micco和Panizza(2004)的一项研究使用多国数据检验了银行所有权是否与商业周期中的银行贷款行为相关。该研究表明,国有银行发挥了有益的信贷平滑作用,因为它们的贷款对宏观经济冲击的反应不如私营银行。Uchida、Udell和Watanabe(2007)对银行业进行了研究,以确定小型银行在处理软件信息和提供基于日本独特数据集的关系贷款方面是否具有比较优势。这项研究的结果表明,大银行通常向大公司借款,而且大银行在提供基于交易的贷款方面不一定具有比较优势。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信