Evidence-based opinions?: How the top jurists in the United States differ in their use of social science in criminal procedure decisions

IF 1.8 4区社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Social Science Journal Pub Date : 2020-10-08 DOI:10.1080/03623319.2020.1806582

Michele Bisaccia Meitl

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of social science research in reaching a judicial decision with broad societal implications dovetails with the emerging push for evidence-based policies regarding criminal procedure issues....

查看原文本刊更多论文

以证据为基础的意见?:美国顶尖法学家在刑事诉讼判决中使用社会科学方面的差异

利用社会科学研究作出具有广泛社会影响的司法决定，与正在兴起的关于刑事诉讼问题的循证政策的推动相吻合....

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Science Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Social Science Journal is the official journal of the Western Social Science Association. The principal purpose of the journal is to publish scholarly work in the social sciences defined in the classical sense, that is in the social sciences, the humanities, and the natural sciences. The research that is published may take a theoretical or speculative model as well as statistical and mathematical. Contributions are welcome from all fields which have relevant and insightful comments to make about the social sciences. The journal also includes a Research Note section which is devoted to supporting scholarly research that is in progress. The journal has a well-established book review section which reflects the academic and intellectual diversity within the WSSA.