Effect Of Creep On The Long-Term Deflection Of Box Girder Balanced Cantilever Bridge Structure Using B3 Model and CEB 2010

Luki Hariando Purba, B. Supriyadi, B. Suhendro
{"title":"Effect Of Creep On The Long-Term Deflection Of Box Girder Balanced Cantilever Bridge Structure Using B3 Model and CEB 2010","authors":"Luki Hariando Purba, B. Supriyadi, B. Suhendro","doi":"10.22146/jcef.4905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creep significantly affects the long-term deflection of the prestressed concrete bridge structure. Some models often used in predicting creep do not consider the water-cement ratio. The water-cement ratio is a factor in the magnitude of creep. If the water-cement ratio is excessive, the creep will also be significant. B3 Model uses the water-cement ratio in predicting creep in prestressed concrete bridge structures and has provided good accuracy with measured deflection data. This study compares B3 Model with Model CEB 2010 to predict the effect of creep on the long-term deflection. The author modeled the bridge structure using Midas Civil 2022 v1.2 software by utilizing the construction stages analysis facility to idealize the balanced cantilever and the effect of creep on the long-term deflection. Envelope displacement of bridge B3 Model is more significant than CEB 2010. The prediction deflection of the B3 Model in 100 years of service life of the bridge is -16.34 cm, while CEB 2010 is -11.90 cm. Creep affects total deflection by 84% to 88%. Creep affects the deflection significant because, in the construction process, each box girder segment is stressed and loaded at the age of 3 days. At the age of 3 days, the elastic modulus of the concrete is still not entirely, and the cement paste on the concrete is still in the hydration process. The results showed a significant difference between B3 Model and CEB 2010. B3 Model predicts that the long-term deflection of the bridge until the end of the bridge's service life is 44% to 49% greater than the CEB 2010 model. Prediction of total deflection until the end of 100 years of bridge service life does not exceed the limit determined by SNI and CEB codes.","PeriodicalId":31890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.4905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creep significantly affects the long-term deflection of the prestressed concrete bridge structure. Some models often used in predicting creep do not consider the water-cement ratio. The water-cement ratio is a factor in the magnitude of creep. If the water-cement ratio is excessive, the creep will also be significant. B3 Model uses the water-cement ratio in predicting creep in prestressed concrete bridge structures and has provided good accuracy with measured deflection data. This study compares B3 Model with Model CEB 2010 to predict the effect of creep on the long-term deflection. The author modeled the bridge structure using Midas Civil 2022 v1.2 software by utilizing the construction stages analysis facility to idealize the balanced cantilever and the effect of creep on the long-term deflection. Envelope displacement of bridge B3 Model is more significant than CEB 2010. The prediction deflection of the B3 Model in 100 years of service life of the bridge is -16.34 cm, while CEB 2010 is -11.90 cm. Creep affects total deflection by 84% to 88%. Creep affects the deflection significant because, in the construction process, each box girder segment is stressed and loaded at the age of 3 days. At the age of 3 days, the elastic modulus of the concrete is still not entirely, and the cement paste on the concrete is still in the hydration process. The results showed a significant difference between B3 Model and CEB 2010. B3 Model predicts that the long-term deflection of the bridge until the end of the bridge's service life is 44% to 49% greater than the CEB 2010 model. Prediction of total deflection until the end of 100 years of bridge service life does not exceed the limit determined by SNI and CEB codes.
基于B3模型和CEB 2010的徐变对箱梁平衡悬臂桥结构长期挠度的影响
徐变对预应力混凝土桥梁结构的长期挠度有显著影响。一些常用的蠕变预测模型没有考虑水灰比。水灰比是影响蠕变大小的一个因素。如果水灰比过大,徐变也会很明显。B3模型采用水灰比预测预应力混凝土桥梁结构的徐变,对实测挠度数据具有较好的精度。本研究将B3模型与CEB 2010模型进行比较,预测蠕变对长期挠度的影响。作者使用Midas Civil 2022 v1.2软件对桥梁结构进行建模,利用施工阶段分析功能,理想化平衡悬臂和徐变对长期挠度的影响。桥梁B3模型的包络位移比CEB 2010更显著。B3模型预测桥梁100年使用寿命的挠度为-16.34 cm, CEB 2010的预测挠度为-11.90 cm。蠕变对总挠度的影响为84% - 88%。徐变对挠度的影响很大,因为在施工过程中,每个箱梁段在3天的龄期受到应力和荷载的影响。龄期3天时,混凝土的弹性模量仍未完全形成,混凝土上的水泥浆体仍处于水化过程。结果表明,B3模型与CEB 2010之间存在显著差异。B3模型预测桥梁在使用寿命结束前的长期挠度比CEB 2010模型大44% ~ 49%。桥梁100年使用寿命前的总挠度预测不超过SNI和CEB规范规定的极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信