The role of Russian volunteers in the collapse of the international legion in the South African War

B. Gorelik
{"title":"The role of Russian volunteers in the collapse of the international legion in the South African War","authors":"B. Gorelik","doi":"10.5787/49-2-1311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of an international legion by General Georges de Villebois-Mareuil in March 1900 was the most ambitious attempt to coordinate the activities of foreign volunteer units within a single formation during the South African War. On the general’s death (5 April 1900), De Villebois’s Russian deputy and successor, Lieutenant Colonel Yevgeny Maximov, lost control of the legion. As a hierarchical formation, it survived De Villebois by only two weeks. Given Maximov’s ample experience in conventional and unconventional warfare, and the accolades that he later won from the republican political and military leadership, including the rank of general, the legionnaires’ opposition to him appears to be unjustified. Accounting for the discrepancy between historians’ perceptions of Maximov and his lack of success in controlling the legion is based on a premise that legionnaires had compelling reasons to reject his authority. Maximov had come to Africa ostensibly as a journalist. He was yet to earn the respect of his subordinates because he had not seen action in the South African War. In subsequent weeks, having resigned from his post in the legion, he distinguished himself in the engagement at Tobaberg as the leader of the Dutch corps. By then, Maximov had the ‘moral authority’ to command an international unit, but his poor health prevented him from carrying on fighting. Unlike De Villebois, who was supported by like-minded French lieutenants, Maximov could not rely on his compatriots. Instead of endorsing his claim to leadership, the Russian corps refused to join the legion while he was in charge, and intentionally discredited him. In the power vacuum after De Villebois’s death, the legion collapsed, and a chance to transform the emerging alliance of foreign volunteer units into a formidable force was missed.","PeriodicalId":53024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Militaria","volume":"63 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Militaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5787/49-2-1311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The establishment of an international legion by General Georges de Villebois-Mareuil in March 1900 was the most ambitious attempt to coordinate the activities of foreign volunteer units within a single formation during the South African War. On the general’s death (5 April 1900), De Villebois’s Russian deputy and successor, Lieutenant Colonel Yevgeny Maximov, lost control of the legion. As a hierarchical formation, it survived De Villebois by only two weeks. Given Maximov’s ample experience in conventional and unconventional warfare, and the accolades that he later won from the republican political and military leadership, including the rank of general, the legionnaires’ opposition to him appears to be unjustified. Accounting for the discrepancy between historians’ perceptions of Maximov and his lack of success in controlling the legion is based on a premise that legionnaires had compelling reasons to reject his authority. Maximov had come to Africa ostensibly as a journalist. He was yet to earn the respect of his subordinates because he had not seen action in the South African War. In subsequent weeks, having resigned from his post in the legion, he distinguished himself in the engagement at Tobaberg as the leader of the Dutch corps. By then, Maximov had the ‘moral authority’ to command an international unit, but his poor health prevented him from carrying on fighting. Unlike De Villebois, who was supported by like-minded French lieutenants, Maximov could not rely on his compatriots. Instead of endorsing his claim to leadership, the Russian corps refused to join the legion while he was in charge, and intentionally discredited him. In the power vacuum after De Villebois’s death, the legion collapsed, and a chance to transform the emerging alliance of foreign volunteer units into a formidable force was missed.
在南非战争中,俄罗斯志愿军在国际军团崩溃中的作用
1900年3月,乔治·德·维尔布瓦-马雷伊将军建立了一个国际军团,这是南非战争期间在一个编队内协调外国志愿部队活动的最雄心勃勃的尝试。在将军死后(1900年4月5日),德维尔布瓦的俄罗斯副手和继任者,叶夫根尼·马克西莫夫中校失去了对军团的控制。作为一个等级结构,它只比德维勒布瓦多活了两周。考虑到马克西莫夫在常规和非常规战争中的丰富经验,以及他后来从共和党政治和军事领导人那里赢得的荣誉,包括将军的军衔,退伍军人们对他的反对似乎是不合理的。历史学家对马克西莫夫的看法与他未能成功控制军团之间的差异,是基于一个前提,即军团士兵有令人信服的理由拒绝他的权威。马西莫夫到非洲来,表面上是做记者的。他还没有赢得下属的尊重,因为他没有参加过南非战争。在随后的几个星期里,他辞去了军团的职务,在托巴贝尔格战役中,他作为荷兰军团的指挥官表现突出。那时,马克西莫夫已经有了指挥一支国际部队的“道德权威”,但他糟糕的健康状况使他无法继续战斗。与德维尔布瓦不同,德维尔布瓦得到了志同道合的法国副官的支持,马克西莫夫不能依赖他的同胞。俄军不但不认可他的领导地位,反而在他当政期间拒绝加入军团,并故意诋毁他。在德维尔布瓦死后的权力真空中,军团崩溃了,错过了将新兴的外国志愿军联盟转变为强大力量的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信