Old and New Organizational Forms in a Complex Society: A Systems-Theoretical Perspective

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
C. Besio, V. Tacke
{"title":"Old and New Organizational Forms in a Complex Society: A Systems-Theoretical Perspective","authors":"C. Besio, V. Tacke","doi":"10.1177/08969205231189472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution demonstrates the potential of Niklas Luhmann’s organization theory to enrich current research on organizational phenomena. Although this theory originated more than half a century ago, we show that it is a powerful instrument to describe and understand the role that different old and new forms of organizations play in current crises and transformation processes. Hereby, we stress two combined advantages of the theory: (1) Luhmann offers a strong concept of organizations as self-referential networks of decisions. This helps to distinguish them from other social entities, for example, groups, social networks, or families. Moreover, the assumption of ‘substitutability of structures’ allows us to grasp the dynamics of a variety of organizations and does not fail to confront even ‘fluid’, ‘virtual’, ‘temporary’, and ‘unconventional’ forms of organization unknown at the time of the theory’s origin. (2) This theory of organization is unique as it is embedded in an encompassing theory of society that offers several concepts suitable to explain the reciprocal influence of organizations and broader social contexts. This prevents any under- and overestimation of the organization phenomenon in modern society.","PeriodicalId":47686,"journal":{"name":"Critical Sociology","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231189472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This contribution demonstrates the potential of Niklas Luhmann’s organization theory to enrich current research on organizational phenomena. Although this theory originated more than half a century ago, we show that it is a powerful instrument to describe and understand the role that different old and new forms of organizations play in current crises and transformation processes. Hereby, we stress two combined advantages of the theory: (1) Luhmann offers a strong concept of organizations as self-referential networks of decisions. This helps to distinguish them from other social entities, for example, groups, social networks, or families. Moreover, the assumption of ‘substitutability of structures’ allows us to grasp the dynamics of a variety of organizations and does not fail to confront even ‘fluid’, ‘virtual’, ‘temporary’, and ‘unconventional’ forms of organization unknown at the time of the theory’s origin. (2) This theory of organization is unique as it is embedded in an encompassing theory of society that offers several concepts suitable to explain the reciprocal influence of organizations and broader social contexts. This prevents any under- and overestimation of the organization phenomenon in modern society.
复杂社会中的新旧组织形式:系统理论视角
这一贡献显示了卢曼组织理论丰富当前组织现象研究的潜力。尽管这一理论起源于半个多世纪以前,但我们表明,它是描述和理解不同新旧形式的组织在当前危机和转型过程中所扮演的角色的有力工具。因此,我们强调该理论的两个综合优势:(1)Luhmann提出了组织作为决策的自我参照网络的强烈概念。这有助于将他们与其他社会实体(例如团体、社交网络或家庭)区分开来。此外,“结构可替代性”的假设使我们能够掌握各种组织的动态,并且不会失败,甚至面对理论起源时未知的“流动”,“虚拟”,“临时”和“非常规”的组织形式。(2)这种组织理论是独特的,因为它嵌入在一个包罗万象的社会理论中,提供了几个适合解释组织和更广泛的社会背景的相互影响的概念。这防止了对现代社会组织现象的任何低估和高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Sociology
Critical Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Critical Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research. Originally appearing as The Insurgent Sociologist, it grew out of the tumultuous times of the late 1960s and was a by-product of the "Sociology Liberation Movement" which erupted at the 1969 meetings of the American Sociological Association. At first publishing work mainly within the broadest boundaries of the Marxist tradition, over the past decade the journal has been home to articles informed by post-modern, feminist, cultural and other perspectives that critically evaluate the workings of the capitalist system and its impact on the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信