Perceptions and academic and professional aspirations of teachers-in-training: gender barriers or possibilities?

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Intangible Capital Pub Date : 2020-10-23 DOI:10.3926/ic.1638
María Dolores Hidalgo Ariza, Juan Manuel Muñoz González, E. F. Hinojosa Pareja
{"title":"Perceptions and academic and professional aspirations of teachers-in-training: gender barriers or possibilities?","authors":"María Dolores Hidalgo Ariza, Juan Manuel Muñoz González, E. F. Hinojosa Pareja","doi":"10.3926/ic.1638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper presents the results of the application of an adaptation of the \"Perceived Barriers Questionnaire\" (PBQ) (Rodriguez-Lajo, Vila and Freixa, 2008) to identify if there are gender roles and stereotypes that influence the perceptions and future expectations, both in academic and the professional spheres, of teachers-in-training at the University of Cordoba. Design/methodology/approach: The sample of the study is composed of the students enrolled in the Social Education Degree and the Masters in Inclusive Education and Teaching Staff of Compulsory Secondary Education and Baccalaureate, Vocational Training and Language Teaching at the University of Cordoba. The questionnaire was administered to 157 students. The data were subjected to descriptive analysis, comparative means, correlational and regression analysis, study of internal consistency and factorial structure through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Findings: The results show, among other issues, some professional aspirations related to training rather than leadership, a greater fear of negative evaluation in women than in men and an important relationship between the perception of the gender role attributed to men and women in the workplace and their own aspirations and educational and professional expectations. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation of the study s in its sample, as it is focused only on students of careers belonging to the field of Education Sciences and, specifically, at the University of Cordoba, so it would be interesting to carry out future studies with samples wider population.","PeriodicalId":45252,"journal":{"name":"Intangible Capital","volume":"21 1","pages":"31-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intangible Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This paper presents the results of the application of an adaptation of the "Perceived Barriers Questionnaire" (PBQ) (Rodriguez-Lajo, Vila and Freixa, 2008) to identify if there are gender roles and stereotypes that influence the perceptions and future expectations, both in academic and the professional spheres, of teachers-in-training at the University of Cordoba. Design/methodology/approach: The sample of the study is composed of the students enrolled in the Social Education Degree and the Masters in Inclusive Education and Teaching Staff of Compulsory Secondary Education and Baccalaureate, Vocational Training and Language Teaching at the University of Cordoba. The questionnaire was administered to 157 students. The data were subjected to descriptive analysis, comparative means, correlational and regression analysis, study of internal consistency and factorial structure through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Findings: The results show, among other issues, some professional aspirations related to training rather than leadership, a greater fear of negative evaluation in women than in men and an important relationship between the perception of the gender role attributed to men and women in the workplace and their own aspirations and educational and professional expectations. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation of the study s in its sample, as it is focused only on students of careers belonging to the field of Education Sciences and, specifically, at the University of Cordoba, so it would be interesting to carry out future studies with samples wider population.
在职教师的认知、学术和职业抱负:性别障碍还是可能性?
目的:本文介绍了应用“感知障碍问卷”(PBQ) (Rodriguez-Lajo, Vila和Freixa, 2008)的结果,以确定是否存在性别角色和刻板印象影响科尔多瓦大学在职教师在学术和专业领域的看法和对未来的期望。设计/方法/方法:研究样本由科尔多瓦大学社会教育学位和全纳教育硕士以及义务中等教育和学士学位、职业培训和语言教学的教学人员组成。对157名学生进行了问卷调查。通过探索性和验证性因子分析,对数据进行描述性分析、比较方法、相关分析和回归分析、内部一致性研究和析因结构研究。研究发现:结果显示,除其他问题外,一些职业抱负与培训有关,而不是与领导有关;女性比男性更害怕负面评价;在工作场所中,男性和女性对性别角色的看法与他们自己的抱负、教育和职业期望之间存在重要关系。研究局限性/影响:研究的主要局限性在于其样本,因为它只关注属于教育科学领域的职业学生,特别是科尔多瓦大学的学生,因此在更广泛的人群中开展未来的研究将会很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intangible Capital
Intangible Capital MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Intangible Capital is to publish theoretical and empirical articles that contribute to contrast, extend and build theories that contribute to advance our understanding of phenomena related with management, and the management of intangibles, in organizations, from the perspectives of strategic management, human resource management, psychology, education, IT, supply chain management and accounting. The scientific research in management is grounded on theories developed from perspectives taken from a diversity of social sciences. Intangible Capital is open to publish articles that, from sociology, psychology, economics and industrial organization contribute to the scientific development of management and organizational science. Intangible Capital publishes scholar articles that contribute to contrast existing theories, or to build new theoretical approaches. The contributions can adopt confirmatory (quantitative) or explanatory (mainly qualitative) methodological approaches. Theoretical essays that enhance the building or extension of theoretical approaches are also welcome. Intangible Capital selects the articles to be published with a double bind, peer review system, following the practices of good scholarly journals. Intangible Capital publishes three regular issues per year following an open access policy. On-line publication allows to reduce publishing costs, and to make more agile the process of reviewing and edition. Intangible Capital defends that open access publishing fosters the advance of scientific knowledge, making it available to everyone. Intangible Capital publishes articles in English, Spanish and Catalan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信