How Two Different Cenozoic Geologic and Glacial History Paradigms Explain the Southcentral Montana Musselshell-Yellowstone River Drainage Divide Origin, USA

E. Clausen
{"title":"How Two Different Cenozoic Geologic and Glacial History Paradigms Explain the Southcentral Montana Musselshell-Yellowstone River Drainage Divide Origin, USA","authors":"E. Clausen","doi":"10.5539/ESR.V10N2P42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accepted Cenozoic geologic and glacial history paradigm (accepted paradigm) considers the southcentral Montana Musselshell-Yellowstone River drainage divide to have originated during Tertiary (or preglacial) time while a new and different Cenozoic geologic and glacial history paradigm (new paradigm) describes how headward erosion of a northeast-oriented Musselshell River valley segment captured huge southeast-oriented meltwater floods to create the drainage divide late during a continental ice sheet’s melt history. Northwest to southeast oriented divide crossings (low points observed on detailed topographic maps where water once flowed across the drainage divide), southeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments immediately upstream from northeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments, and southeast- and northwest-oriented tributaries to northeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments indicate a major southeast-oriented drainage system predated the northeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments. Closeness of the divide crossings, divide crossing floor elevations, large escarpment-surrounded erosional amphitheater-shaped basins, and unusual flat-floored internally drained basin areas (straddling the drainage divide), all suggest the previous southeast-oriented drainage system moved large quantities of water which deeply eroded the region. In the mid-20th century geomorphologists working from the accepted paradigm perspective determined trying to explain such erosional landform evidence from the accepted paradigm perspective was a nonproductive research activity and now rarely investigate erosional landform origins. On the other hand, the new paradigm appears to explain most, if not all observed erosional landform features, although the two paradigms lead to significantly different regional Cenozoic geologic and glacial histories that cannot be easily compared.  ","PeriodicalId":11486,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ESR.V10N2P42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The accepted Cenozoic geologic and glacial history paradigm (accepted paradigm) considers the southcentral Montana Musselshell-Yellowstone River drainage divide to have originated during Tertiary (or preglacial) time while a new and different Cenozoic geologic and glacial history paradigm (new paradigm) describes how headward erosion of a northeast-oriented Musselshell River valley segment captured huge southeast-oriented meltwater floods to create the drainage divide late during a continental ice sheet’s melt history. Northwest to southeast oriented divide crossings (low points observed on detailed topographic maps where water once flowed across the drainage divide), southeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments immediately upstream from northeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments, and southeast- and northwest-oriented tributaries to northeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments indicate a major southeast-oriented drainage system predated the northeast-oriented Yellowstone and Musselshell River segments. Closeness of the divide crossings, divide crossing floor elevations, large escarpment-surrounded erosional amphitheater-shaped basins, and unusual flat-floored internally drained basin areas (straddling the drainage divide), all suggest the previous southeast-oriented drainage system moved large quantities of water which deeply eroded the region. In the mid-20th century geomorphologists working from the accepted paradigm perspective determined trying to explain such erosional landform evidence from the accepted paradigm perspective was a nonproductive research activity and now rarely investigate erosional landform origins. On the other hand, the new paradigm appears to explain most, if not all observed erosional landform features, although the two paradigms lead to significantly different regional Cenozoic geologic and glacial histories that cannot be easily compared.  
两种不同的新生代地质和冰川历史范式如何解释美国蒙大拿州中南部贻贝-黄石河流域的分水岭起源
公认的新生代地质和冰川史范式(accepted paradigm)认为蒙大拿州中南部的贻贝河-黄石河流域分水岭起源于第三纪(或冰期前)时期,而一种新的、不同的新生代地质和冰川史范式(new paradigm)描述了东北方向的贻贝河流域如何向前侵蚀,捕获了巨大的东南方向的融水洪水,从而在大陆后期形成了流域分水岭冰盖融化的历史。西北至东南方向的分水岭交叉点(在详细的地形图上观察到水曾经流过分水岭的低洼点),东南方向的黄石公园和贝河段直接上游于东北方向的黄石公园和贝河段,东南向和西北向的黄石河和贝河段的支流指向东北向的黄石河和贝河段,表明在东北向的黄石河和贝河段之前有一个主要的东南向的排水系统。分隔道口的紧密性、分隔道口的楼层高度、巨大的悬崖环绕的侵蚀圆形盆地,以及不寻常的平坦的内部排水盆地区域(横跨排水道口),都表明以前的东南方向的排水系统移动了大量的水,深深地侵蚀了该地区。在20世纪中期,地貌学家从公认的范式角度出发,决定试图从公认的范式角度解释这种侵蚀地貌证据是一种非生产性的研究活动,现在很少研究侵蚀地貌的起源。另一方面,新的模式似乎解释了大部分(如果不是全部)观测到的侵蚀地貌特征,尽管这两种模式导致了明显不同的区域新生代地质和冰川历史,无法轻易比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信