Methodological support of verification control of geological and hydrodynamic models and forecast flow rates based on the results of operational drilling of wells

IF 1.7 0 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
D. Potekhin, I. Putilov, S. Galkin
{"title":"Methodological support of verification control of geological and hydrodynamic models and forecast flow rates based on the results of operational drilling of wells","authors":"D. Potekhin, I. Putilov, S. Galkin","doi":"10.5510/ogp2022si200745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In аrticle we analyze the drilling results based on three-dimensional geological and hydrodynamic models based on data from 115 wells in 28 different fields in the Volga-Ural and Timan-Pechora oil and gas provinces. The analysis of the results of production drilling of wells on the accepted geological and hydrodynamic models was carried out. The confirmation of the main elements of the geological three-dimensional model is considered. To differentiate the reasons for the deviation of the forecast flow rates associated with geological and hydrodynamic modeling, it is suggested to use the graph of comparison of the relative deviation of flow rates and the filtrationcapacitive properties predicted on the geological model. Efficiency and visibility of the separation of geological and technological reasons for the unconfirmed debits on the chart showed that, first of all, the factors related to reservoir development technologies and the forecast of the hydrodynamic model influence the flow rates. The study allows to choose effective measures to reduce the risk of failure to reach the planned production at oil fields, it is proposed to improve the methods of geological and hydrodynamic modeling in the direction of the development of the use of multivariate modeling technologies. Keywords: reservoir; predicted oil production; reservoir simulation modeling; porosity; permeability; reservoir properties.","PeriodicalId":43516,"journal":{"name":"SOCAR Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOCAR Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5510/ogp2022si200745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In аrticle we analyze the drilling results based on three-dimensional geological and hydrodynamic models based on data from 115 wells in 28 different fields in the Volga-Ural and Timan-Pechora oil and gas provinces. The analysis of the results of production drilling of wells on the accepted geological and hydrodynamic models was carried out. The confirmation of the main elements of the geological three-dimensional model is considered. To differentiate the reasons for the deviation of the forecast flow rates associated with geological and hydrodynamic modeling, it is suggested to use the graph of comparison of the relative deviation of flow rates and the filtrationcapacitive properties predicted on the geological model. Efficiency and visibility of the separation of geological and technological reasons for the unconfirmed debits on the chart showed that, first of all, the factors related to reservoir development technologies and the forecast of the hydrodynamic model influence the flow rates. The study allows to choose effective measures to reduce the risk of failure to reach the planned production at oil fields, it is proposed to improve the methods of geological and hydrodynamic modeling in the direction of the development of the use of multivariate modeling technologies. Keywords: reservoir; predicted oil production; reservoir simulation modeling; porosity; permeability; reservoir properties.
地质和水动力模型的验证控制和基于实际钻井结果的流量预测的方法支持
本文基于伏尔加-乌拉尔和蒂曼-佩霍拉油气省28个不同油田115口井的数据,基于三维地质和水动力学模型分析了钻井结果。根据公认的地质和水动力模型,对油井生产钻井结果进行了分析。考虑了地质三维模型主要元素的确定。为了区分与地质和水动力模型相关的预测流量偏差的原因,建议使用流量相对偏差与地质模型预测的过滤电容特性的对比图。图中未确认借方的地质和技术原因分离的效率和可见性表明,首先,油藏开发技术和水动力模型预测的相关因素会影响流量。研究允许选择有效的措施来降低油田无法达到计划生产的风险,提出了在多变量建模技术的发展方向上改进地质和水动力建模方法。关键词:水库;预测产油量;油藏模拟建模;孔隙度;渗透率;储层属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOCAR Proceedings
SOCAR Proceedings ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
82.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信