Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival Trends Among Women Older Than 65 Years of Age in the United States, 1995-2008.

IF 1.8 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jenny J Lin, Natalia Egorova, Rebeca Franco, Monica Prasad-Hayes, Nina A Bickell
{"title":"Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival Trends Among Women Older Than 65 Years of Age in the United States, 1995-2008.","authors":"Jenny J Lin, Natalia Egorova, Rebeca Franco, Monica Prasad-Hayes, Nina A Bickell","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000001196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether overall survival is improving among women in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study evaluated trends in treatment and overall survival for women older than 65 years diagnosed with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 1995 and 2008 using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Parametric and semiparametric multivariate survival analyses were used to assess comparative treatment survival rates and factors affecting survival and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,938 women who met study criteria, 2.9% received no treatment, 15.4% underwent surgery only, 24.8% received chemotherapy only, 41.8% underwent primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy in an optimal timeframe, and 15.1% had primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy, but the timing was not optimal or patients did not complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Those who underwent surgery only had similar survival as those who received no treatment (2.2 compared with 1.7 months), whereas those who received chemotherapy only had a better overall survival (14.4 months). Optimal treatment was associated with the longest survival time (P<.001, median overall survival 39.0 months). Additionally, survival time associated with optimal treatment increased over the past decade. However, the proportion of women who received optimal treatment has decreased over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elderly women with advanced ovarian cancer have the best survival with optimal therapy. When this is not offered or possible, chemotherapy alone offers better survival than surgery alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":55260,"journal":{"name":"China Ocean Engineering","volume":"29 1","pages":"81-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether overall survival is improving among women in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trends in treatment and overall survival for women older than 65 years diagnosed with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 1995 and 2008 using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Parametric and semiparametric multivariate survival analyses were used to assess comparative treatment survival rates and factors affecting survival and recurrence.

Results: Of 7,938 women who met study criteria, 2.9% received no treatment, 15.4% underwent surgery only, 24.8% received chemotherapy only, 41.8% underwent primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy in an optimal timeframe, and 15.1% had primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy, but the timing was not optimal or patients did not complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Those who underwent surgery only had similar survival as those who received no treatment (2.2 compared with 1.7 months), whereas those who received chemotherapy only had a better overall survival (14.4 months). Optimal treatment was associated with the longest survival time (P<.001, median overall survival 39.0 months). Additionally, survival time associated with optimal treatment increased over the past decade. However, the proportion of women who received optimal treatment has decreased over the past decade.

Conclusion: Elderly women with advanced ovarian cancer have the best survival with optimal therapy. When this is not offered or possible, chemotherapy alone offers better survival than surgery alone.

1995-2008 年美国 65 岁以上女性的卵巢癌治疗和生存趋势。
目的:评估美国晚期卵巢癌患者的总生存率是否有所提高:评估美国晚期卵巢癌妇女的总生存率是否有所提高:这项回顾性队列研究利用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据,评估了 1995 年至 2008 年间 65 岁以上确诊为 III 期和 IV 期上皮性卵巢癌妇女的治疗和总生存率趋势。参数和半参数多变量生存分析用于评估比较治疗生存率以及影响生存和复发的因素:在符合研究标准的 7938 名妇女中,2.9% 的人未接受任何治疗,15.4% 的人仅接受了手术,24.8% 的人仅接受了化疗,41.8% 的人在最佳时间框架内接受了原发性剥脱手术和化疗,15.1% 的人接受了原发性剥脱手术和化疗,但时机不佳或患者未完成全部六个周期的化疗。仅接受手术治疗的患者的生存期与未接受治疗的患者相似(2.2 个月与 1.7 个月),而仅接受化疗的患者的总生存期较长(14.4 个月)。最佳治疗与最长的存活时间有关(结论:患有晚期卵巢癌的老年妇女接受最佳治疗的生存率最高。在无法提供或不可能提供最佳治疗的情况下,单纯化疗比单纯手术的生存率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Ocean Engineering
China Ocean Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12.6 months
期刊介绍: Being an international journal, China Ocean Engineering (COE) takes its prime function as the integration of new research concepts, equipment, technology, materials and structures and other scientific advances within the field of estuarial, coastal, offshore, and deepwater engineering with particular reference to developments. The Journal is concerned with all engineering aspects involved in the exploration and utilization of ocean resources. Topics regularly covered include research, design and construction of structures (including wharfs, dikes, breakwaters, platforms, mooring systems, etc.), instrumentation/testing (physical model and numerical model), wave dynamics, sedimentation, structural/stress analysis, soil mechanics, and material research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信