Green Premium: What is the Implied Prognosis for Sustainability?

Q2 Social Sciences
K. Addae-Dapaah, J. Wilkinson
{"title":"Green Premium: What is the Implied Prognosis for Sustainability?","authors":"K. Addae-Dapaah, J. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1080/19498276.2021.1915663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We live in a world where economic considerations underpin almost every decision to determine our social priorities. It is not surprising then that sustainability has fast become, among other things, economic advocacy. This has led to a proliferation of studies to establish the provenance of green premium to provide impetus for sustainable real estate development to drive the sustainability agenda. The extant literature is replete with studies that conclude that green buildings, which are a proxy for sustainable real estate, command a green premium notwithstanding disagreement about the size of the green premium. We revisit the green premium debate by analysing BREEAM certified office buildings (proxy for green buildings) in the Greater London area to ascertain the prevalence of green premium to answer the following questions: is the premium truly green (green-magic)? What prognosis does green premium provide for sustainability? The study uses quantitative analysis (hedonic model to analyse 2,842 CoStar transaction data from 2008 to 2018 inclusive and psychographic analysis based on primary data from a questionnaire survey of approximately 450 BREEAM certified building owners and occupiers in the Greater London area to address the research questions. The preliminary results of the hedonic model analysis show that BREEAM certification commands a rental and price premium of 4.3% and 22.3% respectively. Furthermore, the results reveal that a higher certification level generally generates a higher premium while certified buildings in outer zones generate a higher premium than those in the CBD. In addition, the results of both the quantitative and psychographic analyses imply that the premium is more a novelty premium than green-magic. This portends a dismal prognosis for sustainability to warn us that sustainability cannot be won on purely economic grounds. Finally, the results of the psychographic analyses show that there is no meeting of minds (consensus ad idem) between investors in green office buildings on one side and green office space users (tenants) on the other. The results of the study could be of interest to London green office building market participants, researchers, practitioners and sustainability adherents.","PeriodicalId":37016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Real Estate","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19498276.2021.1915663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We live in a world where economic considerations underpin almost every decision to determine our social priorities. It is not surprising then that sustainability has fast become, among other things, economic advocacy. This has led to a proliferation of studies to establish the provenance of green premium to provide impetus for sustainable real estate development to drive the sustainability agenda. The extant literature is replete with studies that conclude that green buildings, which are a proxy for sustainable real estate, command a green premium notwithstanding disagreement about the size of the green premium. We revisit the green premium debate by analysing BREEAM certified office buildings (proxy for green buildings) in the Greater London area to ascertain the prevalence of green premium to answer the following questions: is the premium truly green (green-magic)? What prognosis does green premium provide for sustainability? The study uses quantitative analysis (hedonic model to analyse 2,842 CoStar transaction data from 2008 to 2018 inclusive and psychographic analysis based on primary data from a questionnaire survey of approximately 450 BREEAM certified building owners and occupiers in the Greater London area to address the research questions. The preliminary results of the hedonic model analysis show that BREEAM certification commands a rental and price premium of 4.3% and 22.3% respectively. Furthermore, the results reveal that a higher certification level generally generates a higher premium while certified buildings in outer zones generate a higher premium than those in the CBD. In addition, the results of both the quantitative and psychographic analyses imply that the premium is more a novelty premium than green-magic. This portends a dismal prognosis for sustainability to warn us that sustainability cannot be won on purely economic grounds. Finally, the results of the psychographic analyses show that there is no meeting of minds (consensus ad idem) between investors in green office buildings on one side and green office space users (tenants) on the other. The results of the study could be of interest to London green office building market participants, researchers, practitioners and sustainability adherents.
绿色溢价:可持续性的隐含预测是什么?
在我们生活的世界里,经济考虑几乎是决定我们社会优先事项的每一个决定的基础。因此,可持续发展迅速成为经济宣传的一个方面,也就不足为奇了。这导致了大量的研究,以确定绿色溢价的来源,为可持续房地产开发提供动力,推动可持续发展议程。现存的文献中充满了这样的研究,即绿色建筑作为可持续房地产的代表,尽管对绿色溢价的大小存在分歧,但它们仍能获得绿色溢价。我们通过分析大伦敦地区BREEAM认证的办公楼(绿色建筑的代表)来重新审视绿色溢价的争论,以确定绿色溢价的普遍程度,并回答以下问题:溢价真的是绿色的吗?绿色溢价为可持续发展提供了怎样的预测?该研究使用定量分析(享乐模型)来分析2008年至2018年的2,842笔CoStar交易数据,并基于对大伦敦地区约450名BREEAM认证建筑业主和居住者进行问卷调查的主要数据进行心理分析,以解决研究问题。hedonic模型分析的初步结果表明,BREEAM认证的租金溢价和价格溢价分别为4.3%和22.3%。此外,研究结果表明,认证等级越高,溢价越高,而外区认证建筑的溢价高于CBD内认证建筑。此外,定量分析和心理分析的结果都表明,这种溢价更多的是一种新奇溢价,而不是绿色魔力。这预示着对可持续性的悲观预测,并警告我们,单凭经济理由是无法赢得可持续性的。最后,心理分析的结果表明,绿色办公建筑的投资者和绿色办公空间的使用者(租户)之间没有思想上的一致(共识和理念)。研究结果可能会引起伦敦绿色办公楼市场参与者、研究人员、实践者和可持续性拥护者的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Real Estate
Journal of Sustainable Real Estate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信