A Pointwise-optimal Ensemble of Surrogate Models

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Pengwei Liang, Shuai Zhang, Yonglin Pang, Jianji Li, Xueguan Song
{"title":"A Pointwise-optimal Ensemble of Surrogate Models","authors":"Pengwei Liang, Shuai Zhang, Yonglin Pang, Jianji Li, Xueguan Song","doi":"10.1115/1.4062979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The ensemble of surrogate models is commonly used to replace computationally expensive simulations due to their superior prediction accuracy and robustness compared to individual models. This paper proposes a new pointwise ensemble of surrogate models, namely, a Pointwise-optimal ensemble of surrogate models (POEM). To address the limitations of the cross-validation (CV) error in evaluating the performance of regression surrogate models, this paper introduces the compensated cross-validation (CCV) error, which is more reliable in selecting better individual surrogate models and improving the accuracy of surrogate model ensembles. To overcome the limitations of CV error in calculating pointwise weight factors, this paper designs and solves an optimization problem at training points to obtain corresponding pointwise weight factors. Additionally, this paper proposes two weight calculation methods to be applied in the interpolation and extrapolation regions, respectively, to reduce the instability of ensembles caused by extrapolation. Thirty test functions are employed to investigate the appropriate hyperparameters of POEM and the Friedman test is used to verify the rationality of the a value. The thirty test functions are also used to examine the performance of POEM and compare it with state-of-the-art ensemble surrogate models. Furthermore, POEM is applied to a large-aperture mirror holder optimization case to verify its superiority. The results demonstrate that POEM presents better accuracy and robustness than individual surrogates and other compared ensembles of surrogate models.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ensemble of surrogate models is commonly used to replace computationally expensive simulations due to their superior prediction accuracy and robustness compared to individual models. This paper proposes a new pointwise ensemble of surrogate models, namely, a Pointwise-optimal ensemble of surrogate models (POEM). To address the limitations of the cross-validation (CV) error in evaluating the performance of regression surrogate models, this paper introduces the compensated cross-validation (CCV) error, which is more reliable in selecting better individual surrogate models and improving the accuracy of surrogate model ensembles. To overcome the limitations of CV error in calculating pointwise weight factors, this paper designs and solves an optimization problem at training points to obtain corresponding pointwise weight factors. Additionally, this paper proposes two weight calculation methods to be applied in the interpolation and extrapolation regions, respectively, to reduce the instability of ensembles caused by extrapolation. Thirty test functions are employed to investigate the appropriate hyperparameters of POEM and the Friedman test is used to verify the rationality of the a value. The thirty test functions are also used to examine the performance of POEM and compare it with state-of-the-art ensemble surrogate models. Furthermore, POEM is applied to a large-aperture mirror holder optimization case to verify its superiority. The results demonstrate that POEM presents better accuracy and robustness than individual surrogates and other compared ensembles of surrogate models.
代理模型的点最优集成
代理模型的集成通常用于取代计算昂贵的模拟,因为与单个模型相比,它们具有更高的预测精度和鲁棒性。本文提出了一种新的代理模型点优化集成,即代理模型点优化集成(POEM)。为了解决交叉验证(CV)误差在评估回归代理模型性能时的局限性,本文引入了补偿交叉验证(CCV)误差,该误差在选择更好的单个代理模型和提高代理模型集成的准确性方面更为可靠。为了克服CV误差在计算逐点权重因子时的局限性,本文设计并解决了一个训练点优化问题,以获得相应的逐点权重因子。此外,本文还提出了两种权重计算方法,分别应用于内插和外推区域,以减少外推引起的系统不稳定性。采用30个检验函数考察了POEM的合适超参数,并采用Friedman检验验证了a值的合理性。这30个测试函数还用于检查POEM的性能,并将其与最先进的集成代理模型进行比较。并将该方法应用于大口径反射镜支架优化实例,验证了该方法的优越性。结果表明,与单个替代模型和其他替代模型组合相比,POEM具有更好的准确性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanical Design
Journal of Mechanical Design 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials. Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信