Modified knee extension training for treatment of patellar malalignment

Mingzhu Lee, Chi-Chuan Wu, Mei-Chuan Chen
{"title":"Modified knee extension training for treatment of patellar malalignment","authors":"Mingzhu Lee, Chi-Chuan Wu, Mei-Chuan Chen","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.201802_9(1).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with patellar malalignment (PM) are common in orthopedic clinics. Conservative treatment first for PM is generally supported. Generally, reinforcing vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) strength is most convincing. Knee extension had been reported to be able to initiate VMO activities in electromyogram (EMG). Also, goosestep training had been reported to be able to upraise VMO/vatus lateralis (VL) ratio in EMG. Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate clinical effects of modified knee extension training on treating lateral patellar tilt or subluxation. Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive adult patients (average: 52 years) were treated with modified knee extension training. It was performed once each day and each time needed 50 times (about one minute). Plain knee radiographs of anteroposterior, lateral, and Merchant's axial views were taken before treatment. Exclusion criteria were trochlear dysplasia (> 144° of sulcus angle), patellar alta or dislocation, symmetrical mediolateral patellofemoral (P-F) joint space (P-F index = 1), and snapping hips clinically. Ten weeks later, clinical outcome using modified Kujala score (5 items with 40 points) and Merchant's axial radiograph (congruence angle, lateral P-F angle, and P-F index) were compared statistically. Results: All 37 patients with 68 knees (32 bilaterally and 4 unilaterally) were followed at the outpatients' department (OPD) at 10-12 weeks. Before treatment, none of patients were satisfactory (average knee score: 27.2 points). At the latest follow-up, 89% of patients (33/37) were satisfactory (p < 0.001) with an average knee score of 33.1 (p = 0.01). Only the P-F index was statistically significant before and after treatment (3.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001) on Merchant's axial radiographs. Conclusion: The described technique may be one of excellent techniques for conservative treatment of PM. The technique is simple and an 89% success rate is relatively acceptable. The P-F index may be practical for follow-up of treatment effect.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"59 1","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.201802_9(1).0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patients with patellar malalignment (PM) are common in orthopedic clinics. Conservative treatment first for PM is generally supported. Generally, reinforcing vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) strength is most convincing. Knee extension had been reported to be able to initiate VMO activities in electromyogram (EMG). Also, goosestep training had been reported to be able to upraise VMO/vatus lateralis (VL) ratio in EMG. Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate clinical effects of modified knee extension training on treating lateral patellar tilt or subluxation. Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive adult patients (average: 52 years) were treated with modified knee extension training. It was performed once each day and each time needed 50 times (about one minute). Plain knee radiographs of anteroposterior, lateral, and Merchant's axial views were taken before treatment. Exclusion criteria were trochlear dysplasia (> 144° of sulcus angle), patellar alta or dislocation, symmetrical mediolateral patellofemoral (P-F) joint space (P-F index = 1), and snapping hips clinically. Ten weeks later, clinical outcome using modified Kujala score (5 items with 40 points) and Merchant's axial radiograph (congruence angle, lateral P-F angle, and P-F index) were compared statistically. Results: All 37 patients with 68 knees (32 bilaterally and 4 unilaterally) were followed at the outpatients' department (OPD) at 10-12 weeks. Before treatment, none of patients were satisfactory (average knee score: 27.2 points). At the latest follow-up, 89% of patients (33/37) were satisfactory (p < 0.001) with an average knee score of 33.1 (p = 0.01). Only the P-F index was statistically significant before and after treatment (3.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001) on Merchant's axial radiographs. Conclusion: The described technique may be one of excellent techniques for conservative treatment of PM. The technique is simple and an 89% success rate is relatively acceptable. The P-F index may be practical for follow-up of treatment effect.
改良膝关节伸展训练治疗髌骨错位
背景:髌骨错位(PM)患者在骨科诊所很常见。一般支持先对PM进行保守治疗。一般来说,加强股内侧斜肌(VMO)的力量是最有说服力的。据报道,膝关节伸展能够在肌电图(EMG)中启动VMO活动。此外,据报道,正步训练能够提高肌电图中的VMO/ VL比率。目的:本前瞻性研究的目的是探讨改良膝关节伸展训练治疗外侧髌骨倾斜或半脱位的临床效果。方法:连续37例成人患者(平均年龄:52岁)接受改良膝关节伸展训练。每天1次,每次50次(约1分钟)。治疗前拍摄膝关节正位平片、侧位平片和膝关节轴位平片。排除标准为滑车发育不良(沟角> 144°)、髌骨上位或脱位、对称的髌股中外侧关节间隙(P-F指数= 1)、临床撕髋。10周后,采用改良Kujala评分(5项40分)和Merchant轴向x线片(同余角、侧位P-F角、P-F指数)对临床结果进行统计学比较。结果:37例患者68个膝关节(32例双侧,4例单侧)均于10-12周在门诊随访。治疗前,患者均不满意(平均膝关节评分:27.2分)。在最近的随访中,89%的患者(33/37)满意(p < 0.001),平均膝关节评分为33.1 (p = 0.01)。在Merchant的轴位x线片上,治疗前后只有p - f指数有统计学意义(3.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001)。结论:该方法可作为PM保守治疗的一种优良方法。这项技术很简单,89%的成功率是相对可以接受的。P-F指数可用于治疗效果的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信