Comparative study of laparoscopic gastrectomy D2 radical surgery and open gastrectomy for upper stomach cancer

Wenlin Lin, Zhixiong Li, Yanchang Xu, Xuyun Xie, Zhiqing Huang, Guofeng Pan
{"title":"Comparative study of laparoscopic gastrectomy D2 radical surgery and open gastrectomy for upper stomach cancer","authors":"Wenlin Lin, Zhixiong Li, Yanchang Xu, Xuyun Xie, Zhiqing Huang, Guofeng Pan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2014.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the safety,tumor radical and early postoperative efficacy through comparison of laparoscopic gastric D2 radical surgery with traditional open gastric D2 radical surgery.Methods 254 patients with upper stomach cancer underwent surgery were selected,132 cases using conventional open gastrectomy (the traditional laparotomy group),122 patients underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (laparoscopic surgery group).Laparoscopic surgery group with traditional open surgery group had no statistically significant differences in gender,age,tumor location,histological type and TNM staging.Results Open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group had statistically significant differences in operative time [(235.78±31.56) min,(256.43±54.08) min,P < 0.001],blood loss [(326.69±89.73) ml,(158.31±62.98) ml,P < 0.001],incision length [(16.53±2.34) cm,(5.51±1.15) cm,P < 0.001],gastrointestinal recovery time [(4.22±0.91) d,(3.31±0.83) d,P < 0.001],first time eating liquid [(5.78±0.95) d,(5.56±0.78) d,P < 0.001] and postoperative hospital stay [(12.62±2.89) d,(11.18±1.78) d,P < 0.001].The total number of lymph node dissection and complications was not statistically significant.Conclusions Laparoscopic gastric D2 radical surgery is a safe,minimally invasive surgical method.Laparoscopic gastric D2 radical surgery has the same lymph node dissection and good early outcome compared with the traditional gastric D2 radical surgery,but postoperative recovery fast and less invasive. Key words: Gastric neoplasms;  Gastric cancer radical operation;  Laparoscopic;  Rubber band fixed law","PeriodicalId":16936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine","volume":"158 1","pages":"332-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2014.05.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety,tumor radical and early postoperative efficacy through comparison of laparoscopic gastric D2 radical surgery with traditional open gastric D2 radical surgery.Methods 254 patients with upper stomach cancer underwent surgery were selected,132 cases using conventional open gastrectomy (the traditional laparotomy group),122 patients underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (laparoscopic surgery group).Laparoscopic surgery group with traditional open surgery group had no statistically significant differences in gender,age,tumor location,histological type and TNM staging.Results Open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group had statistically significant differences in operative time [(235.78±31.56) min,(256.43±54.08) min,P < 0.001],blood loss [(326.69±89.73) ml,(158.31±62.98) ml,P < 0.001],incision length [(16.53±2.34) cm,(5.51±1.15) cm,P < 0.001],gastrointestinal recovery time [(4.22±0.91) d,(3.31±0.83) d,P < 0.001],first time eating liquid [(5.78±0.95) d,(5.56±0.78) d,P < 0.001] and postoperative hospital stay [(12.62±2.89) d,(11.18±1.78) d,P < 0.001].The total number of lymph node dissection and complications was not statistically significant.Conclusions Laparoscopic gastric D2 radical surgery is a safe,minimally invasive surgical method.Laparoscopic gastric D2 radical surgery has the same lymph node dissection and good early outcome compared with the traditional gastric D2 radical surgery,but postoperative recovery fast and less invasive. Key words: Gastric neoplasms;  Gastric cancer radical operation;  Laparoscopic;  Rubber band fixed law
腹腔镜胃切除术D2根治术与开放式胃切除术治疗上胃癌的比较研究
目的比较腹腔镜胃D2根治术与传统开放胃D2根治术的安全性、肿瘤根治性及术后早期疗效。方法选取经手术治疗的上胃癌患者254例,其中常规开胃切除术132例(传统开腹组),腹腔镜根治性胃癌122例(腹腔镜手术组)。腹腔镜手术组与传统开放手术组在性别、年龄、肿瘤位置、组织学类型、TNM分期等方面差异均无统计学意义。结果开放手术组与腹腔镜手术组在手术时间[(235.78±31.56)min,(256.43±54.08)min,P < 0.001]、出血量[(326.69±89.73)ml,(158.31±62.98)ml,P < 0.001]、切口长度[(16.53±2.34)cm,(5.51±1.15)cm,P < 0.001]、胃肠恢复时间[(4.22±0.91)d,(3.31±0.83)d,P < 0.001]、首次流食时间[(5.78±0.95)d,(5.56±0.78)d,P < 0.001]、术后住院时间[(12.62±2.89)d,(11.18±1.78)d,P < 0.001]、差异均有统计学意义。两组淋巴结清扫及并发症总数比较,差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜胃D2根治术是一种安全、微创的手术方法。腹腔镜胃D2根治术与传统胃D2根治术相比,具有相同的淋巴结清扫和良好的早期预后,但术后恢复快,创伤小。关键词:胃肿瘤;胃癌根治术;腹腔镜;橡皮筋固定律
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信