Recuperating Rebellion: Rewriting Revolting Women in(to) Nineteenth-Century Cuba and the Philippines

Kristina Escondo
{"title":"Recuperating Rebellion: Rewriting Revolting Women in(to) Nineteenth-Century Cuba and the Philippines","authors":"Kristina Escondo","doi":"10.31944/20199201.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the late nineteenth-century independence movements as points of departure, this article uses a transoceanic approach to explore women’s revolutionary history in Cuba and the Philippines. Using María Lugones’ model of the modern/colonial gender system as a frame, I trace how women’s revolutionary contributions became co-opted by male revolutionary figures in service to their own aims, rewriting the “revolting women” (in the rebellious sense) so that they were less “revolting” (viz. causing disgust) to nationalizing discourses. I argue that these national heroes, such as José Martí in Cuba and José Rizal in the Philippines, contributed to the minimization and even erasure of women’s revolutionary participation and knowledge production through these rewritings. This allowed the coloniality of power to endure well into the new world order via reframing of a woman’s place—or lack thereof—in the nationalizing project. To unearth the complexities of this minimized history, I dig deeper into these canonical literatures to find women’s voices in letters, speeches, and oral histories to show how women sympathetic to the revolution actively conceptualized nation and citizenship through writing, protest, and action. As the field of Philippine-Hispanic Studies expands, this article aims to begin a conversation where we may confront and re-evaluate the privilege assigned to male national heroes’ discourses in both Hispanic regions and the Philippines, Kristina A. Escondo Otterbein University, Ohio","PeriodicalId":83395,"journal":{"name":"Unitas (Helsinki, Finland : English edition)","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unitas (Helsinki, Finland : English edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31944/20199201.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the late nineteenth-century independence movements as points of departure, this article uses a transoceanic approach to explore women’s revolutionary history in Cuba and the Philippines. Using María Lugones’ model of the modern/colonial gender system as a frame, I trace how women’s revolutionary contributions became co-opted by male revolutionary figures in service to their own aims, rewriting the “revolting women” (in the rebellious sense) so that they were less “revolting” (viz. causing disgust) to nationalizing discourses. I argue that these national heroes, such as José Martí in Cuba and José Rizal in the Philippines, contributed to the minimization and even erasure of women’s revolutionary participation and knowledge production through these rewritings. This allowed the coloniality of power to endure well into the new world order via reframing of a woman’s place—or lack thereof—in the nationalizing project. To unearth the complexities of this minimized history, I dig deeper into these canonical literatures to find women’s voices in letters, speeches, and oral histories to show how women sympathetic to the revolution actively conceptualized nation and citizenship through writing, protest, and action. As the field of Philippine-Hispanic Studies expands, this article aims to begin a conversation where we may confront and re-evaluate the privilege assigned to male national heroes’ discourses in both Hispanic regions and the Philippines, Kristina A. Escondo Otterbein University, Ohio
休养叛乱:改写19世纪古巴和菲律宾的反抗妇女
本文以十九世纪晚期的独立运动为出发点,以跨洋视角探讨古巴和菲律宾的妇女革命史。以María lugoones的现代/殖民性别体系模型为框架,我追踪女性的革命贡献如何被男性革命人物所吸收,以服务于他们自己的目标,重写“反抗的女性”(在反叛的意义上),使她们对国有化话语不那么“反抗”(即引起厌恶)。我认为,这些民族英雄,如古巴的jos Martí和菲律宾的jos Rizal,通过这些重写,使妇女的革命参与和知识生产最小化,甚至被抹去。这使得权力的殖民性通过在国有化计划中重构女性的地位(或缺乏这种地位),得以很好地延续到新的世界秩序中。为了揭示这段被最小化的历史的复杂性,我深入挖掘这些经典文献,在信件、演讲和口述历史中寻找女性的声音,以展示同情革命的女性如何通过写作、抗议和行动积极地概念化国家和公民身份。随着菲律宾-西班牙裔研究领域的扩展,本文旨在开启一场对话,我们可能会面对并重新评估在西班牙裔地区和菲律宾赋予男性民族英雄话语的特权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书