S. Tong, A. Mcmichael
{"title":"The magnitude, persistence and public health significance of cognitive effects of environmental lead exposure in childhood","authors":"S. Tong, A. Mcmichael","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199904/06)1:2<103::AID-JEM15>3.0.CO;2-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although much research has been done on the effects of lead exposure on cognitive development, the magnitude, persistence and public health implications of such effects remain controversial. A literature search, in conjunction with our own work, was conducted to review these issues. Currently available evidence suggests that early exposure to environmental lead may cause a discernible effect on cognitive development, and this effect seems to persist into later childhood. No threshold is evident down to a blood lead concentration of 5 μg dl−1, although there is a paucity of epidemiological data at these lower levels. An economic loss could be serious for children exposed to an excess of lead in their environment. The environmental lead problem is preventable, or, where it is already established, is remediable. It should therefore be addressed, especially in developing countries where rapid industrialisation and increased use of motor vehicles are occurring. There is clear evidence that excessive lead exposure is still a significant public health issue in most countries, particularly developing countries. The formulation of a public health strategy should seek a balance between consideration of the nature and extent of the risk to human population health, knowledge of any dose-effect threshold, estimation of socio-environmental benefits, and commitment to making the best use of existing resources. The development of such a strategy should take into account the views and priorities of all interested parties, and—most certainly—those of communities directly at risk from lead exposure. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":100780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":"103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199904/06)1:2<103::AID-JEM15>3.0.CO;2-S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
儿童环境铅暴露对认知影响的程度、持久性和公共卫生意义
虽然已经就铅接触对认知发展的影响进行了大量研究,但这种影响的程度、持久性和公共卫生影响仍然存在争议。文献检索,结合我们自己的工作,进行了审查这些问题。目前可获得的证据表明,早期接触环境铅可能会对认知发展造成明显的影响,这种影响似乎会持续到童年后期。血铅浓度低于5 μg dl - 1没有明显的阈值,尽管缺乏这些较低水平的流行病学数据。对环境中铅超标的儿童来说,经济损失可能是严重的。环境铅问题是可以预防的,或者,如果已经存在,是可以补救的。因此,应该解决这个问题,特别是在工业化迅速和机动车使用增加的发展中国家。有明确证据表明,在大多数国家,特别是发展中国家,过量接触铅仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题。公共卫生战略的制定应寻求在以下方面取得平衡:考虑人口健康风险的性质和程度、了解任何剂量效应阈值、估计社会环境效益,以及承诺最佳利用现有资源。这种战略的制定应考虑到所有有关各方的意见和优先事项,当然还有直接面临铅接触风险的社区的意见和优先事项。版权所有©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。