Progressing Quality Care Process Metrics for Public Health Nursing: An Approach towards Modified Delphi

L. O’Connor, E. McAuliffe, M. Casey, L. Rogers, A. Gallen, M. Glasgow, C. White, C. Buckley, M. Giltenan, A. Lane, M. Barnard
{"title":"Progressing Quality Care Process Metrics for Public Health Nursing: An Approach towards Modified Delphi","authors":"L. O’Connor, E. McAuliffe, M. Casey, L. Rogers, A. Gallen, M. Glasgow, C. White, C. Buckley, M. Giltenan, A. Lane, M. Barnard","doi":"10.9734/BPI/IDHR/V1/2788F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nursing plays a central role in facilitating care in the community setting, yet there is no consensus of public health nurses contribution to care, and how to measure what hidden or explicit things they do to provide high quality and safe care. A modified Delphi approach with an expert panel was established with the purpose of identifying quality care process metrics for public health nursing care, and respective indicators that could measure their unique and multidimensional contribution to care. \nThis modified Delphi study integrated a four round survey of 218 nurses, face-to-face meetings with a patient representative and key stakeholder holders within public health nursing services, with a final consensus meeting inclusive of a panel of 29 expert nurses in the community setting. \nResults: Delphi rounds 1-4 led to a consensus on fourteen quality care process nursing metrics and sixty-nine associated indicators incorporating expert panellists’ suggestions for the community care setting. Notwithstanding the rating of ‘critical’ in the Delphi rounds, in depth discussions were conducted on all proposed metrics and indicators at the final consensus meeting, and in particular emphasising the key role performed by public health nurses in the context of ‘Maternal Health’, ‘Care Plan Development and Evaluation’ and ‘Health Promotion’. \nConclusion: This paper describes through the lens of public health nursing the development of a set of 14 quality care metrics using a modified Delphi technique aligned with a set of 69 corresponding indicators. The challenge now is the implementation of these quality care process metrics so that public health nurses’ unique and multidimensional contribution to patient-centered care is measurable in the community setting.","PeriodicalId":14672,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 1","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BPI/IDHR/V1/2788F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing plays a central role in facilitating care in the community setting, yet there is no consensus of public health nurses contribution to care, and how to measure what hidden or explicit things they do to provide high quality and safe care. A modified Delphi approach with an expert panel was established with the purpose of identifying quality care process metrics for public health nursing care, and respective indicators that could measure their unique and multidimensional contribution to care. This modified Delphi study integrated a four round survey of 218 nurses, face-to-face meetings with a patient representative and key stakeholder holders within public health nursing services, with a final consensus meeting inclusive of a panel of 29 expert nurses in the community setting. Results: Delphi rounds 1-4 led to a consensus on fourteen quality care process nursing metrics and sixty-nine associated indicators incorporating expert panellists’ suggestions for the community care setting. Notwithstanding the rating of ‘critical’ in the Delphi rounds, in depth discussions were conducted on all proposed metrics and indicators at the final consensus meeting, and in particular emphasising the key role performed by public health nurses in the context of ‘Maternal Health’, ‘Care Plan Development and Evaluation’ and ‘Health Promotion’. Conclusion: This paper describes through the lens of public health nursing the development of a set of 14 quality care metrics using a modified Delphi technique aligned with a set of 69 corresponding indicators. The challenge now is the implementation of these quality care process metrics so that public health nurses’ unique and multidimensional contribution to patient-centered care is measurable in the community setting.
改进公共卫生护理的质量护理过程指标:一种改进的德尔菲方法
背景:护理在促进社区环境中的护理方面发挥着核心作用,但对于公共卫生护士对护理的贡献,以及如何衡量他们为提供高质量和安全的护理所做的隐藏或明确的事情,尚未达成共识。建立了一种由专家组组成的改进德尔菲法,目的是确定公共卫生护理的质量护理过程指标,以及可以衡量其对护理的独特和多维贡献的相应指标。这一改进的德尔福研究整合了对218名护士的四轮调查,与一名患者代表和公共卫生护理服务部门的主要利益相关者进行面对面会议,并在社区环境中由29名专家护士组成的小组进行最终共识会议。结果:德尔菲1-4轮对14个优质护理过程护理指标和69个相关指标达成了共识,其中包括专家小组成员对社区护理环境的建议。尽管德尔菲轮次的评级为“关键”,但在最后的共识会议上,对所有拟议的衡量标准和指标进行了深入讨论,特别强调了公共卫生护士在“孕产妇保健”、“护理计划制定和评估”和“健康促进”方面发挥的关键作用。结论:本文通过公共卫生护理的视角描述了一套14个质量护理指标的发展,使用改进的德尔菲技术与一套69个相应指标相一致。目前的挑战是实施这些优质护理过程指标,以便在社区环境中衡量公共卫生护士对以患者为中心的护理的独特和多维贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信