Clinical relevance and ethical aspects of placebos

Ron Kupers PhD , Serge Marchand PhD
{"title":"Clinical relevance and ethical aspects of placebos","authors":"Ron Kupers PhD ,&nbsp;Serge Marchand PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.spmd.2005.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In recent years, the topic of placebo has gained momentum. Basic scientists started elucidating the neurophysiological and neuropharmacological processes that mediate the placebo response. At the same time, questions arose about the purported power of placebos. In addition, the debate on the ethics of the use of placebos heated up after the publication of some recent surgical trials using invasive placebo surgery procedures. In this article, we discuss the clinical relevance and the ethical problems associated with the use of placebos. Although a recent meta-analysis questioned the power of placebo, good evidence exists that placebos can lead to important improvement in many clinical conditions. A part of the conflict on the ethics of the use of placebos in randomized clinical trials can be solved by distinguishing between ethical guidelines for good clinical practice and for clinical research. We will also discuss some of the difficulties in finding proper placebo controls in clinical trials involving </span>neurosurgical procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101158,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Pain Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.spmd.2005.02.002","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537589705000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In recent years, the topic of placebo has gained momentum. Basic scientists started elucidating the neurophysiological and neuropharmacological processes that mediate the placebo response. At the same time, questions arose about the purported power of placebos. In addition, the debate on the ethics of the use of placebos heated up after the publication of some recent surgical trials using invasive placebo surgery procedures. In this article, we discuss the clinical relevance and the ethical problems associated with the use of placebos. Although a recent meta-analysis questioned the power of placebo, good evidence exists that placebos can lead to important improvement in many clinical conditions. A part of the conflict on the ethics of the use of placebos in randomized clinical trials can be solved by distinguishing between ethical guidelines for good clinical practice and for clinical research. We will also discuss some of the difficulties in finding proper placebo controls in clinical trials involving neurosurgical procedures.

安慰剂的临床相关性和伦理方面
近年来,关于安慰剂的话题愈演愈烈。基础科学家开始阐明介导安慰剂反应的神经生理学和神经药理学过程。与此同时,人们对安慰剂的功效提出了质疑。此外,在最近一些使用侵入性安慰剂手术程序的外科试验发表后,关于使用安慰剂的伦理问题的辩论也变得激烈起来。在这篇文章中,我们讨论与使用安慰剂相关的临床相关性和伦理问题。尽管最近的一项荟萃分析对安慰剂的作用提出了质疑,但有充分的证据表明,安慰剂可以显著改善许多临床状况。在随机临床试验中使用安慰剂的部分伦理冲突可以通过区分良好临床实践和临床研究的伦理准则来解决。我们还将讨论在涉及神经外科手术的临床试验中寻找适当的安慰剂对照的一些困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信