Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Aimée C. Smith, J. Roberts, P. Kong, S. Forrester
{"title":"Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing","authors":"Aimée C. Smith, J. Roberts, P. Kong, S. Forrester","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers’ COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial–lateral (ML) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions using principal component analysis (PCA) and examined their relationship to clubhead velocity. Three-dimensional marker trajectories were collected using Vicon motion analysis and force plate data from two Kistler force plates for 22 low-handicap golfers during drives. Golfers’ COG and COP were expressed as a percentage distance between their feet. PCA was performed on COG and COP in ML and AP directions. Relationships between principal component (PC) scores were examined using Pearson correlation and regression analysis used to examine the relationship with clubhead velocity. ML COP movements varied in magnitude (PC1), rate of change and timing (PC2 and PC3). The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both directions (ML: r = 0.90, P < .05; AP: r = 0.81, P < .05). Clubhead velocity, explained by three PCs (74%), related to timing and rate of change in COPML near downswing (PC2 and PC3) and timing of COGML late backswing (PC2). The relationship between COPML and COGML PC1 scores identified extremes of COP and COG patterns in golfers and could indicate a golfer’s dynamic balance. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot (PC2) and rate of change (PC3) patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.","PeriodicalId":12061,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sport Science","volume":"87 1","pages":"168 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers’ COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial–lateral (ML) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions using principal component analysis (PCA) and examined their relationship to clubhead velocity. Three-dimensional marker trajectories were collected using Vicon motion analysis and force plate data from two Kistler force plates for 22 low-handicap golfers during drives. Golfers’ COG and COP were expressed as a percentage distance between their feet. PCA was performed on COG and COP in ML and AP directions. Relationships between principal component (PC) scores were examined using Pearson correlation and regression analysis used to examine the relationship with clubhead velocity. ML COP movements varied in magnitude (PC1), rate of change and timing (PC2 and PC3). The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both directions (ML: r = 0.90, P < .05; AP: r = 0.81, P < .05). Clubhead velocity, explained by three PCs (74%), related to timing and rate of change in COPML near downswing (PC2 and PC3) and timing of COGML late backswing (PC2). The relationship between COPML and COGML PC1 scores identified extremes of COP and COG patterns in golfers and could indicate a golfer’s dynamic balance. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot (PC2) and rate of change (PC3) patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.
高尔夫挥杆中重心和压力中心形态的比较
分析压力中心(COP)和重心(COG)可以揭示球手在整个挥杆过程中使用的稳定策略。本研究利用主成分分析(PCA)对高尔夫球手在中外侧(ML)和前后(AP)方向上的COP和COG模式进行了识别和比较,并考察了它们与杆头速度的关系。利用Vicon运动分析和两块Kistler力板数据收集了22名低障碍高尔夫球手在击球过程中的三维标记轨迹。高尔夫球手的COG和COP表示为他们两脚之间距离的百分比。在ML和AP方向上对COG和COP进行PCA。主成分(PC)得分之间的关系使用Pearson相关和回归分析来检验与杆头速度的关系。ML COP运动在幅度(PC1)、变化率和时间(PC2和PC3)上有所不同。COP与COG PC1评分呈双向强相关(ML: r = 0.90, P < 0.05;AP: r = 0.81, P < 0.05)。杆头速度,由三个pc(74%)解释,与COPML近下挥杆(PC2和PC3)和COGML晚后挥杆(PC2)的时间和变化率有关。COPML和COGML PC1分数之间的关系可以识别高尔夫球手的COP和COG模式的极端,并可以指示高尔夫球手的动态平衡。在下挥杆之前,较早地将杆头移到前脚(PC2)和改变速度(PC3)模式的高尔夫球手,可能更有可能产生较高的杆头速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Sport Science
European Journal of Sport Science 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Sport Science (EJSS) is the official Medline- and Thomson Reuters-listed journal of the European College of Sport Science. The editorial policy of the Journal pursues the multi-disciplinary aims of the College: to promote the highest standards of scientific study and scholarship in respect of the following fields: (a) Applied Sport Sciences; (b) Biomechanics and Motor Control; c) Physiology and Nutrition; (d) Psychology, Social Sciences and Humanities and (e) Sports and Exercise Medicine and Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信