Research trends in disruptive technologies for accounting of the future – A bibliometric analysis

Atanasko Atanasovski, Todor Tocev
{"title":"Research trends in disruptive technologies for accounting of the future – A bibliometric analysis","authors":"Atanasko Atanasovski, Todor Tocev","doi":"10.24818/jamis.2022.02006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Question: Is there a gap in research preferences on disruptive technologies between academia and practitioners? Motivation: Disruptive technologies in accounting represent a new evolutionary phase of accounting impacted by emerging technologies that are part of industrial revolution 4.0. The relevance of emerging technologies, their potential, and the opportunities they offer for the accounting profession attract both academia and professionals with accelerated research efforts. Academia and scientific researchers must research and provide an appropriate theoretical basis to help practitioners better adapt and increase their awareness and trust in technology. Idea: This paper provides early quantitative research data on publication trends related to most disruptive technologies in accounting such as big data, data analytics, cloud, artificial intelligence, and blockchain. Data: The data were collected through detailed analysis and research of websites and publishing platforms on Big Four accounting firms, professional accounting associations, and institutes, and selected high-ranking journals for the period from 2016 to 2020. Tools: The research was conducted using bibliometric analysis to identify how many articles were published by individual parties. Findings: The results highlight that there are no significant discrepancies or different views of academia and practitioners. It is a positive result indicating that academia and scientific researchers exploit in the same direction as practitioners, thus providing support for adaptation and alignment to technology trends. Contribution: The significance of the results of such research is important for obtaining directions in which the academy should research in the future but also for the regulators as well.","PeriodicalId":14716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2022.02006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Research Question: Is there a gap in research preferences on disruptive technologies between academia and practitioners? Motivation: Disruptive technologies in accounting represent a new evolutionary phase of accounting impacted by emerging technologies that are part of industrial revolution 4.0. The relevance of emerging technologies, their potential, and the opportunities they offer for the accounting profession attract both academia and professionals with accelerated research efforts. Academia and scientific researchers must research and provide an appropriate theoretical basis to help practitioners better adapt and increase their awareness and trust in technology. Idea: This paper provides early quantitative research data on publication trends related to most disruptive technologies in accounting such as big data, data analytics, cloud, artificial intelligence, and blockchain. Data: The data were collected through detailed analysis and research of websites and publishing platforms on Big Four accounting firms, professional accounting associations, and institutes, and selected high-ranking journals for the period from 2016 to 2020. Tools: The research was conducted using bibliometric analysis to identify how many articles were published by individual parties. Findings: The results highlight that there are no significant discrepancies or different views of academia and practitioners. It is a positive result indicating that academia and scientific researchers exploit in the same direction as practitioners, thus providing support for adaptation and alignment to technology trends. Contribution: The significance of the results of such research is important for obtaining directions in which the academy should research in the future but also for the regulators as well.
颠覆性技术对未来会计的研究趋势-文献计量学分析
研究问题:学术界和实践者对颠覆性技术的研究偏好是否存在差距?动机:会计领域的颠覆性技术代表了会计的一个新的进化阶段,受到工业革命4.0中新兴技术的影响。新兴技术的相关性,它们的潜力,以及它们为会计行业提供的机会,吸引了学术界和专业人士,加快了研究工作。学术界和科学研究人员必须研究并提供适当的理论基础,以帮助从业者更好地适应和提高他们对技术的认识和信任。思路:本文提供了与会计领域最具颠覆性的技术(如大数据、数据分析、云、人工智能和区块链)相关的出版趋势的早期定量研究数据。数据:通过对2016 - 2020年四大会计师事务所、会计专业协会、研究所的网站和发布平台,以及精选的高水平期刊进行详细的分析和研究,收集数据。工具:本研究采用文献计量学分析来确定各参与方发表的文章数量。研究发现:研究结果表明,学术界和实践者之间没有明显的差异或不同的观点。这是一个积极的结果,表明学术界和科学研究人员与实践者朝着相同的方向发展,从而为适应和适应技术趋势提供了支持。贡献:该研究结果的意义不仅对获得未来学术界的研究方向具有重要意义,而且对监管机构也具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信