An audit of emergency response to terrorist-related bomb blasts and gunshot injuries: The experience of a low-resource care center in Northern Nigeria

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
O. Amole, T. Amole, K. Omeje, A. Efunkoya, O. Osunde, Muhammad Muhammad, S. Aji, Hassan Ismail, M. Abubakar, Akinwaleola Akinlade, Rufai Ahmed, T. Becker
{"title":"An audit of emergency response to terrorist-related bomb blasts and gunshot injuries: The experience of a low-resource care center in Northern Nigeria","authors":"O. Amole, T. Amole, K. Omeje, A. Efunkoya, O. Osunde, Muhammad Muhammad, S. Aji, Hassan Ismail, M. Abubakar, Akinwaleola Akinlade, Rufai Ahmed, T. Becker","doi":"10.4103/njbcs.njbcs_40_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The management of mass casualty events caused by terrorist-related suicide bombings in densely populated areas is often challenging. Aims: This study describes the pattern of injuries, the emergency response following a suicide bombing in Nigeria in 2014 and compares the outcomes to those of other incidents. Settings and Design: A retrospective analysis of cases that presented to a major tertiary care center was done. Methods and Material: Medical records of 50 patients who experienced bomb blast or gunshot wounds during 28th November, 2014 suicide bombing of the Kano Central Mosque were reviewed and 12 eyewitnesses were interviewed. Statistical analysis used: Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was done while major themes were identified from the key informant interviews. Results: Fifty patients were admitted at the acute care center within 4 hours. There was a male predilection (98%), with a median age of 30 years (IQR, interquartile range = 37.5 years). Most injuries were the result of multiple penetrating projectiles (secondary blast injuries), primarily involving blast-energized metallic fragments like screws, nails, bolts, ball bearings, and metal scraps. Eleven patients (22%) had minor lacerations, about a quarter (n = 12; 24%) had severe hemorrhage and were transfused, five (10%) had multi-system involvement, and mortality rate was 8% (n = 4). Interventions were aimed at preserving the lives of those injured. Conclusion: Most of the victims had major injuries which were appropriately managed although the hospital lacked an existing protocol on mass casualty management. Increased awareness, organized field triage mechanisms, and capacity building in health facilities will facilitate prompt emergency response.","PeriodicalId":19224,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"122 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njbcs.njbcs_40_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The management of mass casualty events caused by terrorist-related suicide bombings in densely populated areas is often challenging. Aims: This study describes the pattern of injuries, the emergency response following a suicide bombing in Nigeria in 2014 and compares the outcomes to those of other incidents. Settings and Design: A retrospective analysis of cases that presented to a major tertiary care center was done. Methods and Material: Medical records of 50 patients who experienced bomb blast or gunshot wounds during 28th November, 2014 suicide bombing of the Kano Central Mosque were reviewed and 12 eyewitnesses were interviewed. Statistical analysis used: Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was done while major themes were identified from the key informant interviews. Results: Fifty patients were admitted at the acute care center within 4 hours. There was a male predilection (98%), with a median age of 30 years (IQR, interquartile range = 37.5 years). Most injuries were the result of multiple penetrating projectiles (secondary blast injuries), primarily involving blast-energized metallic fragments like screws, nails, bolts, ball bearings, and metal scraps. Eleven patients (22%) had minor lacerations, about a quarter (n = 12; 24%) had severe hemorrhage and were transfused, five (10%) had multi-system involvement, and mortality rate was 8% (n = 4). Interventions were aimed at preserving the lives of those injured. Conclusion: Most of the victims had major injuries which were appropriately managed although the hospital lacked an existing protocol on mass casualty management. Increased awareness, organized field triage mechanisms, and capacity building in health facilities will facilitate prompt emergency response.
对与恐怖主义有关的炸弹爆炸和枪伤紧急反应的审计:尼日利亚北部一个资源匮乏的护理中心的经验
背景:在人口稠密地区,管理与恐怖主义有关的自杀式爆炸造成的大规模伤亡事件往往具有挑战性。目的:本研究描述了2014年尼日利亚自杀式爆炸事件后的受伤模式和应急反应,并将其结果与其他事件进行了比较。设置和设计:对提交给主要三级保健中心的病例进行回顾性分析。方法和材料:审查了2014年11月28日卡诺中央清真寺自杀式爆炸事件中遭受炸弹爆炸或枪伤的50名患者的医疗记录,并采访了12名目击者。使用的统计分析:对定量数据进行描述性分析,同时从关键信息提供者访谈中确定主要主题。结果:50例患者在4小时内入住急症护理中心。有男性偏好(98%),中位年龄为30岁(IQR,四分位数间距= 37.5岁)。大多数伤害是由多重穿透弹丸造成的(二次爆炸伤害),主要涉及爆炸激发的金属碎片,如螺钉、钉子、螺栓、滚珠轴承和金属碎片。11例(22%)患者有轻微撕裂伤,约占四分之一(n = 12;24%)有严重出血并输血,5例(10%)有多系统受累,死亡率为8% (n = 4)。干预措施旨在挽救伤者的生命。结论:尽管医院缺乏现有的大规模伤亡管理方案,但大多数受害者都受到了适当的处理。提高认识、有组织的现场分诊机制和卫生设施的能力建设将有助于迅速作出紧急反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences
Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信