P. Sartorelli, F. Carboncini, F. Murdaca, Maria T. Novelli, D. Orsi, Rossana Mancini
{"title":"Contact sensitization in fruit farmers","authors":"P. Sartorelli, F. Carboncini, F. Murdaca, Maria T. Novelli, D. Orsi, Rossana Mancini","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199901/03)1:1<51::AID-JEM10>3.0.CO;2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of sensitization and contact dermatitis in a population of Italian farmers and the importance of pesticides as skin sensitizers. Sixty-four female worker (mean age 35) employed in the harvesting of cherries, peaches, olives and grapes were studied. Skin diseases were assessed with a questionnaire and physical examination. The farm workers were patch tested with the GIRDCA standard series containing 30 allergens and six pesticides currently used on the farm. 18 workers (28%) were sensitized to one or more allergens. 36 subjects (52%) were found to be atopic and three (4.7%) had dermatitis of the hands with positive reactions to the GIRDCA standard series. Differences in contact sensitization betweeen atopic and non atopic patients were not statistically significant (χ2 test). One worker had contact urticaria to peaches and 36 farmers (52%) referred to itching and skin rashes in summer, during the harvesting of peaches. Only 18 workers reported that they almost always wore protective clothing. Despite the high frequency of positive patch tests, contact sensitization to pesticides was unusual in our group. No cases of allergic contact dermatitis to pesticides were found and only one patient who was symptomless (1.5%) had an allergic reaction to pesticides (azinphos-methyl). Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":100780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","volume":"53 1","pages":"51-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199901/03)1:1<51::AID-JEM10>3.0.CO;2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
果农接触致敏
该研究的目的是确定致敏性和接触性皮炎在意大利农民人群中的流行程度,以及农药作为皮肤致敏剂的重要性。对64名从事樱桃、桃子、橄榄和葡萄采摘的女工(平均年龄35岁)进行了研究。皮肤疾病通过问卷调查和体格检查进行评估。农场工人接受了GIRDCA标准系列的贴片测试,该标准系列含有30种过敏原和农场目前使用的6种杀虫剂。18名工人(28%)对一种或多种过敏原敏感。36名受试者(52%)被发现为特应性,3名(4.7%)患有手皮炎,对GIRDCA标准系列有积极反应。异应性与非异应性患者接触致敏性差异无统计学意义(χ2检验)。1名工人与桃子发生接触性荨麻疹,36名农民(52%)在夏季收获桃子期间出现瘙痒和皮疹。只有18名工人报告说他们几乎总是穿着防护服。尽管斑贴试验阳性的频率很高,但接触致敏在我们组中并不常见。无农药过敏性接触性皮炎病例,仅有1例(1.5%)对农药(甲氮磷)有过敏反应。版权所有©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。