Expanding the Kidney Donor Pool through Use of Hepatitis C-Infected Donors: is it Time to Dive in?

Gretchen M. Kipp, L. Biondi, D. Kannabhiran
{"title":"Expanding the Kidney Donor Pool through Use of Hepatitis C-Infected Donors: is it Time to Dive in?","authors":"Gretchen M. Kipp, L. Biondi, D. Kannabhiran","doi":"10.33552/appr.2019.01.000530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The survival benefit of kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is well established. However, the demand for kidney donor organs greatly exceeds the current supply. The use of hepatitis C infected donors could increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation. The use of highly effective second-generation direct acting antivirals (DAAs) has been recently studied for the prevention of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in kidney transplant recipients who are HCV negative and receive HCV infected kidney allografts. Small, open-label trials have demonstrated the feasibility of using DAAs as either preand post-exposure prophylaxis or as treatment after detection of HCV transmission. Short term outcomes illustrate 100% prevention of chronic HCV infection with renal function and allograft survival that are comparable to recipients of non-HCV infected kidney donors. Long-term allograft and patient outcomes are required to determine whether the use of HCV infected organs should be considered for all patients with ESRD waiting for kidney transplant. The survival benefit of kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is well established [1,2]. However, the demand for kidney donor organs greatly exceeds the current supply which encourages organ procurement organizations and transplant centers to look for innovative strategies to increase the donor pool. Recently, the opioid crisis has increased the number of overdose deaths exponentially [3]. Additionally, the number of hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositive donors increased from 452 organs per year to 1506 per year between the years of 2000 and 2016 but only 57% of the HCV seropositive kidneys were transplanted in 2016 [4]. The use of hepatitis C infected donors could increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation but this strategy has historically been avoided because of risk of HCV transmission as well as inadequate treatment response and risk of rejection with interferon-based regimens. The advent of highly effective secondgeneration direct acting antivirals (DAAs) has increased viral cure of patients with chronic HCV infection to more than 96% [5-7]. Ongoing research is investigating whether DAAs can be prescribed post-transplant to HCV negative recipients receiving HCV infected donors to increase the donor pool.","PeriodicalId":8291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Pharmacy & Pharmacology Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Pharmacy & Pharmacology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/appr.2019.01.000530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The survival benefit of kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is well established. However, the demand for kidney donor organs greatly exceeds the current supply. The use of hepatitis C infected donors could increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation. The use of highly effective second-generation direct acting antivirals (DAAs) has been recently studied for the prevention of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in kidney transplant recipients who are HCV negative and receive HCV infected kidney allografts. Small, open-label trials have demonstrated the feasibility of using DAAs as either preand post-exposure prophylaxis or as treatment after detection of HCV transmission. Short term outcomes illustrate 100% prevention of chronic HCV infection with renal function and allograft survival that are comparable to recipients of non-HCV infected kidney donors. Long-term allograft and patient outcomes are required to determine whether the use of HCV infected organs should be considered for all patients with ESRD waiting for kidney transplant. The survival benefit of kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is well established [1,2]. However, the demand for kidney donor organs greatly exceeds the current supply which encourages organ procurement organizations and transplant centers to look for innovative strategies to increase the donor pool. Recently, the opioid crisis has increased the number of overdose deaths exponentially [3]. Additionally, the number of hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositive donors increased from 452 organs per year to 1506 per year between the years of 2000 and 2016 but only 57% of the HCV seropositive kidneys were transplanted in 2016 [4]. The use of hepatitis C infected donors could increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation but this strategy has historically been avoided because of risk of HCV transmission as well as inadequate treatment response and risk of rejection with interferon-based regimens. The advent of highly effective secondgeneration direct acting antivirals (DAAs) has increased viral cure of patients with chronic HCV infection to more than 96% [5-7]. Ongoing research is investigating whether DAAs can be prescribed post-transplant to HCV negative recipients receiving HCV infected donors to increase the donor pool.
通过使用丙型肝炎感染者的供体来扩大肾脏供体池:是时候投入了吗?
肾移植对终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的生存益处是公认的。然而,对肾脏捐赠器官的需求大大超过了目前的供应。使用感染丙型肝炎的供体可以增加可用于移植的肾脏数量。最近研究了使用高效的第二代直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)预防慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染在HCV阴性肾移植受者和接受HCV感染的同种异体肾移植受者中。小型开放标签试验已经证明,使用DAAs作为暴露前和暴露后预防或检测到HCV传播后的治疗是可行的。短期结果表明,慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的100%预防与肾功能和同种异体移植存活率相当,与非丙型肝炎病毒感染的肾脏供体受体相当。对于所有等待肾移植的ESRD患者,是否应该考虑使用HCV感染的器官,需要长期的同种异体移植和患者预后。终末期肾病(ESRD)患者肾移植的生存益处已得到充分证实[1,2]。然而,对肾脏供体器官的需求大大超过了目前的供应,这鼓励器官采购组织和移植中心寻找创新策略来增加供体库。最近,阿片类药物危机使过量死亡人数呈指数增长[3]。此外,从2000年到2016年,丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)血清阳性供体的数量从每年452个增加到每年1506个,但2016年只有57%的HCV血清阳性肾脏被移植[4]。使用丙型肝炎感染的供者可以增加可用于移植的肾脏数量,但由于丙型肝炎病毒传播的风险以及治疗反应不足和干扰素方案的排斥风险,这种策略历来被避免。高效的第二代直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)的出现使慢性HCV感染患者的病毒治愈率提高到96%以上[5-7]。正在进行的研究正在调查是否可以在移植后给接受HCV感染供者的HCV阴性受者开DAAs以增加供者池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信