Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation

María Cerrillo , Gustavo N. Cecchino , María Cruz , Mercedes Mayoral , Alberto Pacheco , Juan A. García-Velasco Prof.
{"title":"Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation","authors":"María Cerrillo ,&nbsp;Gustavo N. Cecchino ,&nbsp;María Cruz ,&nbsp;Mercedes Mayoral ,&nbsp;Alberto Pacheco ,&nbsp;Juan A. García-Velasco Prof.","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Are there differences in serum progesterone levels between different routes of exogenous progesterone administration for artificial endometrial preparation?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This prospective, observational, single-centre study included 9 infertile female patients who underwent cycles of artificial endometrial preparation between January and June 2019 with different progesterone formulations (3 cycles in 2 patients; 2 cycles in 2 patients; and 1 cycle in 5 patients). Oestrogen stimulation was followed by vaginal progesterone 400 mg every 12 h (first cycle), subcutaneous progesterone 25 mg every 12 h (second cycle), and intramuscular progesterone 50 mg every 24 h (third cycle). Progesterone therapy was continued for 5 days and daily serum progesterone was recorded. The primary outcome was day 5 serum progesterone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Day 5 mean ± standard deviation serum progesterone levels after vaginal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular administration were 14.6 ± 5.5, 47.9 ± 22.3, and 60.3 ± 65.5 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.032 across routes). From day 1 to day 5, the coefficients of variation for serum progesterone were 66% and 75% with the vaginal and subcutaneous routes, respectively, indicating low variability, and 146% with the </span>intramuscular route<span>, indicating high variability. Two linear regression<span> models were conducted: a normal linear regression model, which found no significant effect of administration route on serum progesterone, and a mixed-effects linear regression model, which also showed no statistically significant differences between routes.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All routes of progesterone administration showed satisfactory day 5 mean serum progesterone levels, regardless of administration route.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

Are there differences in serum progesterone levels between different routes of exogenous progesterone administration for artificial endometrial preparation?

Material and methods

This prospective, observational, single-centre study included 9 infertile female patients who underwent cycles of artificial endometrial preparation between January and June 2019 with different progesterone formulations (3 cycles in 2 patients; 2 cycles in 2 patients; and 1 cycle in 5 patients). Oestrogen stimulation was followed by vaginal progesterone 400 mg every 12 h (first cycle), subcutaneous progesterone 25 mg every 12 h (second cycle), and intramuscular progesterone 50 mg every 24 h (third cycle). Progesterone therapy was continued for 5 days and daily serum progesterone was recorded. The primary outcome was day 5 serum progesterone.

Results

Day 5 mean ± standard deviation serum progesterone levels after vaginal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular administration were 14.6 ± 5.5, 47.9 ± 22.3, and 60.3 ± 65.5 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.032 across routes). From day 1 to day 5, the coefficients of variation for serum progesterone were 66% and 75% with the vaginal and subcutaneous routes, respectively, indicating low variability, and 146% with the intramuscular route, indicating high variability. Two linear regression models were conducted: a normal linear regression model, which found no significant effect of administration route on serum progesterone, and a mixed-effects linear regression model, which also showed no statistically significant differences between routes.

Conclusion

All routes of progesterone administration showed satisfactory day 5 mean serum progesterone levels, regardless of administration route.

给药途径对人工子宫内膜准备术妇女血清孕酮水平的影响
目的人工子宫内膜制备中不同给药途径的血清孕酮水平是否存在差异?材料和方法这项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究纳入了9例不孕症女性患者,她们在2019年1月至6月期间使用不同的黄体酮制剂接受了人工子宫内膜准备周期(2例患者3次 周期;2例患者2个 周期;5例患者1个 周期)。雌激素刺激后阴道黄体酮400 mg每12 h(第一个周期),皮下黄体酮25 mg每12 h(第二个 周期),肌内黄体酮50 mg每24 h(第三个周期)。黄体酮治疗持续5 天,记录每日血清黄体酮水平。主要终点是第5天的血清黄体酮。ResultsDay 5意味着 ±标准差 血清孕酮水平阴道后,皮下、肌肉管理局14.6 ± 5.5,47.9 ± 22.3,和60.3 ±65.5  ng / mL,分别为(0.032 p = 跨航线)。从第1天到第5天,阴道和皮下途径的血清孕酮变异系数分别为66%和75%,表明变异性低,肌肉注射途径的变异系数为146%,表明变异性高。采用两种线性回归模型:一种是正态线性回归模型,不同给药途径对血清孕酮无显著影响;另一种是混合效应线性回归模型,不同给药途径对血清孕酮无显著影响。结论所有给药途径均可获得满意的第5天平均血清孕酮水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信