PRIMJENA EUROPSKE KONVENCIJE ZA ZAŠTITU LJUDSKIH PRAVA I SLOBODA U UPRAVNOM SPORU U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI

{"title":"PRIMJENA EUROPSKE KONVENCIJE ZA ZAŠTITU\nLJUDSKIH PRAVA I SLOBODA U UPRAVNOM SPORU U\nBOSNI I HERCEGOVINI","authors":"","doi":"10.51558/2712-1178.2022.8.2.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The administrative dispute is an extremely important legal and functional mechanism in every democratic state as a guarantee of legality of public administration actions. The development and strengthening of the rule of law imposed as an imperative\nthe existence of an efficient system of judicial control of the administration, which\nwill provide citizens with broad legal protection in administrative matters. The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina incorporated the European Convention of Human Rights into the legal system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as a fundamental legal\ninstrument for protection of human rights. The Convention’s Protocol 11, established the European Court of Human Rights as the exclusively responsible body for the inter-\npretation of the Convention. The rich practice of the European Court has significantly contributed to the protection of rights in the domain of administrative adjudication.\nThe aim of this paper is to analyze the compliance of the legal framework of administrative adjudication in Bosnia and Herzegovina with the Convention, with reference\nto the practice of the European Court, but also to the practice of the Constitutional\nCourt of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The authors will try to determine the directions of\nreform and europeanization of administrative adjudication, in accordance with the basic european administrative principles and under the assumption that Bosnia and\nHerzegovina should organize its administrative adjudication according to the French model, as one of the best mechanisms of control over public administration actions.","PeriodicalId":31614,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nisu","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nisu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51558/2712-1178.2022.8.2.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The administrative dispute is an extremely important legal and functional mechanism in every democratic state as a guarantee of legality of public administration actions. The development and strengthening of the rule of law imposed as an imperative the existence of an efficient system of judicial control of the administration, which will provide citizens with broad legal protection in administrative matters. The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina incorporated the European Convention of Human Rights into the legal system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as a fundamental legal instrument for protection of human rights. The Convention’s Protocol 11, established the European Court of Human Rights as the exclusively responsible body for the inter- pretation of the Convention. The rich practice of the European Court has significantly contributed to the protection of rights in the domain of administrative adjudication. The aim of this paper is to analyze the compliance of the legal framework of administrative adjudication in Bosnia and Herzegovina with the Convention, with reference to the practice of the European Court, but also to the practice of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The authors will try to determine the directions of reform and europeanization of administrative adjudication, in accordance with the basic european administrative principles and under the assumption that Bosnia and Herzegovina should organize its administrative adjudication according to the French model, as one of the best mechanisms of control over public administration actions.
行政纠纷作为公共行政行为合法性的保障,是每一个民主国家极其重要的法律和功能机制。发展和加强法治,必须建立有效的行政司法监督制度,为公民在行政事务上提供广泛的法律保护。《波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那宪法》将《欧洲人权公约》纳入波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的法律体系,成为保护人权的基本法律文书。《公约》第11号议定书设立了欧洲人权法院,作为解释《公约》的专门负责机构。欧洲法院丰富的实践为行政审判领域的权利保护作出了重要贡献。本文的目的是分析波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那行政审判的法律框架与《公约》的合规性,参考欧洲法院的实践,也参考波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那宪法法院的实践。根据欧洲行政管理的基本原则,并假设波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那应按照法国模式组织行政审判,作为控制公共行政行为的最佳机制之一,笔者将试图确定行政审判改革和欧洲化的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书