Evaluation of the Probiotic Profile of the Lactobacillus Acidophilus Used in Pharmaceutical and Food Applications

J. Schmitt, L. O. Fariña, M. R. Simões, L. Kottwitz
{"title":"Evaluation of the Probiotic Profile of the Lactobacillus Acidophilus Used in Pharmaceutical and Food Applications","authors":"J. Schmitt, L. O. Fariña, M. R. Simões, L. Kottwitz","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I1.36664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lactobacillus acidophilus used in three different applications, compounding pharmacies (LA1), fermented dairy (LA2), and allopathic compoundings (LA3) were tested to evaluate the existence of significant differences between them and in different growth conditions. In the evaluation of resistance to different commercial use antibiotics, all strains were sensitive to the antibiotics ampicillin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and tetracycline. LA1 was considered moderately sensitive (MS) to erythromycin and LA3 was MS to clindamycin and erythromycin. LA3 was classified between MS to resistant to erythromycin. All three strains were resistant to gentamicin. When evaluating acid pH resistance, the three origins presented similar behavior, with a decrease in cell viability at pH 2, maintaining constant viability at pH 3 and 4. In the test of resistance to the gastrointestinal tract conditions and hydrophobicity, LA2 presented better results. The three strains showed production of inhibitory compounds against pathogenic bacteria and deconjugated tauroconjugated bile salts (TDCA). It was concluded that, depending on the origin, Lactobacillus acidophilus may present different behaviors that will determine its growth and, consequently, its action in vivo . Due to the practicality of access, economy, and the satisfactory results in the tests performed, LA2 can be considered the strain of choice among those studied.","PeriodicalId":7185,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"36664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I1.36664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Lactobacillus acidophilus used in three different applications, compounding pharmacies (LA1), fermented dairy (LA2), and allopathic compoundings (LA3) were tested to evaluate the existence of significant differences between them and in different growth conditions. In the evaluation of resistance to different commercial use antibiotics, all strains were sensitive to the antibiotics ampicillin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and tetracycline. LA1 was considered moderately sensitive (MS) to erythromycin and LA3 was MS to clindamycin and erythromycin. LA3 was classified between MS to resistant to erythromycin. All three strains were resistant to gentamicin. When evaluating acid pH resistance, the three origins presented similar behavior, with a decrease in cell viability at pH 2, maintaining constant viability at pH 3 and 4. In the test of resistance to the gastrointestinal tract conditions and hydrophobicity, LA2 presented better results. The three strains showed production of inhibitory compounds against pathogenic bacteria and deconjugated tauroconjugated bile salts (TDCA). It was concluded that, depending on the origin, Lactobacillus acidophilus may present different behaviors that will determine its growth and, consequently, its action in vivo . Due to the practicality of access, economy, and the satisfactory results in the tests performed, LA2 can be considered the strain of choice among those studied.
在制药和食品中应用的嗜酸乳杆菌益生菌谱评价
对三种不同应用中的嗜酸乳杆菌进行了测试,分别是复合制剂(LA1)、发酵乳制品(LA2)和对抗药复合制剂(LA3),以评估它们之间以及不同生长条件下是否存在显著差异。在对不同市售抗生素的耐药性评价中,所有菌株对氨苄西林、氯霉素、强力霉素和四环素均敏感。LA1对红霉素中度敏感(MS), LA3对克林霉素和红霉素均为MS。LA3在MS和对红霉素耐药之间进行分类。这三种菌株都对庆大霉素耐药。当评估耐酸性pH值时,三种来源表现出相似的行为,在pH 2时细胞活力下降,在pH 3和4时细胞活力保持不变。在对胃肠道条件的抵抗力和疏水性测试中,LA2表现出较好的效果。这3株菌株均能产生抑制致病菌的化合物和去偶联牛磺酸胆盐(TDCA)。由此得出结论,嗜酸乳杆菌可能表现出不同的行为,这将决定其生长,从而决定其在体内的作用,这取决于来源。由于可获得性、经济性和所进行试验的满意结果,LA2可以被认为是所研究菌株中的首选菌株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信