The Promise of Abortion Pills: Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of Self-Managed Medication Abortion and Opportunities to Expand Access

Dana M. Johnson
{"title":"The Promise of Abortion Pills: Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of Self-Managed Medication Abortion and Opportunities to Expand Access","authors":"Dana M. Johnson","doi":"10.25172/smulr.76.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Dobbs v. Jackson Whole Women’s Health Organization ruling, medication abortion pills have received an enormous amount of attention. The two medication abortion pill regimens, mifepristone used with misoprostol, or misoprostol used by itself, have been the subject of extensive public health research. Less discussed in the legal scholarship are the differences between the two regimens and their uses for self-managed medication abortion. In the United States, when people refer to medication abortion pills, they are often referencing mifepristone used with misoprostol. But in other parts of the world, when people refer to medication abortion pills, they often mean misoprostol alone. Public health researchers have examined the safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of self-managed abortion using both medication abortion regimens. This Article draws on this evidence base and provides opportunities for expanding access to medication abortion pills. This is especially important now that some states have legal climates similar to countries where abortion has long been restricted and researchers anticipate that people will increasingly seek access to medication abortion pills and turn to self-managed medication abortion.","PeriodicalId":80169,"journal":{"name":"SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.76.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the Dobbs v. Jackson Whole Women’s Health Organization ruling, medication abortion pills have received an enormous amount of attention. The two medication abortion pill regimens, mifepristone used with misoprostol, or misoprostol used by itself, have been the subject of extensive public health research. Less discussed in the legal scholarship are the differences between the two regimens and their uses for self-managed medication abortion. In the United States, when people refer to medication abortion pills, they are often referencing mifepristone used with misoprostol. But in other parts of the world, when people refer to medication abortion pills, they often mean misoprostol alone. Public health researchers have examined the safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of self-managed abortion using both medication abortion regimens. This Article draws on this evidence base and provides opportunities for expanding access to medication abortion pills. This is especially important now that some states have legal climates similar to countries where abortion has long been restricted and researchers anticipate that people will increasingly seek access to medication abortion pills and turn to self-managed medication abortion.
堕胎药的承诺:关于自我管理药物流产的安全性和有效性的证据以及扩大获取的机会
自从多布斯诉杰克逊全妇女健康组织的裁决以来,堕胎药物受到了极大的关注。两种流产药物方案,米非司酮与米索前列醇联合使用,或米索前列醇单独使用,一直是广泛的公共卫生研究的主题。在法律学术中较少讨论的是两种方案之间的差异及其对自我管理药物流产的使用。在美国,当人们提到药物流产药时,他们通常指的是米非司酮与米索前列醇一起使用。但在世界其他地方,当人们提到药物流产药时,他们通常指的是米索前列醇。公共卫生研究人员已经检查了使用两种药物流产方案的自我管理流产的安全性、有效性和可接受性。本文借鉴了这一证据基础,并提供了机会,扩大获得药物流产药。这一点尤其重要,因为现在一些州的法律环境与长期限制堕胎的国家类似,研究人员预计,人们将越来越多地寻求获得药物流产药,并转向自我管理药物流产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信