Bringing the Best to Downhole Fluid Sampling by Evaluating the Focused Sampling Technique with Multiple Packer Types in Exploration and Development Wells – Case Studies from South East Asia

Arfan Ali, Azimah Jofri, Norshah Zamikhan, Jahnabi Borah, Mohd Noor Isa Yahya, Erik van den Heuvel, Igor Kim, N. Hardikar, S. Coskun
{"title":"Bringing the Best to Downhole Fluid Sampling by Evaluating the Focused Sampling Technique with Multiple Packer Types in Exploration and Development Wells – Case Studies from South East Asia","authors":"Arfan Ali, Azimah Jofri, Norshah Zamikhan, Jahnabi Borah, Mohd Noor Isa Yahya, Erik van den Heuvel, Igor Kim, N. Hardikar, S. Coskun","doi":"10.2118/197326-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the advancement of Focused Sampling techniques, wireline formation fluid sampling has undergone a dramatic change. This has primarily been due to the promise of acquiring representative formation fluid samples with minimal mud filtrate contamination and large sample volumes, thereby adding value to the PVT laboratory studies as well as reducing the fluid sampling time, thus aiding significantly to the cost savings. This paper demonstrates the contribution of focused sampling technology for reservoir fluid mapping in numerous exploration and development wells in South East (SE) Asia, by optimized selection of different packer types based on varying reservoir properties.\n For the exploration wells, the primary objective was to determine the non-hydrocarbon (non-HC) content (CO2 and H2S in this case) of the single-phase reservoir fluid samples, which were expected to be close to the saturation pressures. Following the 3D near-wellbore simulations, an elongated and an extra-elongated focused packer were selected due to expected low permeabilities, reservoir thickness and wellbore conditions. The wells were drilled in managed pressure drilling (MPD) conditions, with overbalance ranging from 900 to 4,300 psi. The development campaign consisted of five producers with key objectives of determining fluid type and the non-HC (CO2 in this case) content along with assessing the reservoir/block connectivity. The concentration and uncertainty in CO2 distribution would have a major impact in developing the production strategy of the area. A standard focused packer was selected for the sampling jobs which were carried out on pipe due to high overbalance conditions (~2,400 psi).\n In the exploration wells, 30+ samples (gas, oil and water) were collected with the time-on-wall ranging between 1.5 and 7 hours. In the development campaign, 50+ samples (gas and oil) were collected with the time-on-wall ranging between 45 minutes and 2.5 hours. Given the depths and low permeabilities of the reservoirs with high overbalance, this resulted in significant time savings. The larger flow area of the elongated and extra-elongated focused packers ensured minimal contamination in the collected samples given the challenging sampling conditions, where restrictions to pressure drawdown existed. The PVT laboratory results showed ‘insignificant’ oil-based mud filtrate contamination in the samples. In addition, the large sample volumes provided flexibility for additional PVT studies and improved resource assessment.\n The focused sampling technology was successfully applied in both exploration and development campaigns in the SE Asia region. The pre-job simulations ensured optimal packer selection between the three focused packer types. The comparison between the actual sampling results and the 3D near-wellbore simulation would help optimize future sampling operations in the area. In addition, the two campaigns have reiterated a clear value of information in saving cost, reducing contamination in the samples and technology success in the given environments.","PeriodicalId":11061,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197326-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the advancement of Focused Sampling techniques, wireline formation fluid sampling has undergone a dramatic change. This has primarily been due to the promise of acquiring representative formation fluid samples with minimal mud filtrate contamination and large sample volumes, thereby adding value to the PVT laboratory studies as well as reducing the fluid sampling time, thus aiding significantly to the cost savings. This paper demonstrates the contribution of focused sampling technology for reservoir fluid mapping in numerous exploration and development wells in South East (SE) Asia, by optimized selection of different packer types based on varying reservoir properties. For the exploration wells, the primary objective was to determine the non-hydrocarbon (non-HC) content (CO2 and H2S in this case) of the single-phase reservoir fluid samples, which were expected to be close to the saturation pressures. Following the 3D near-wellbore simulations, an elongated and an extra-elongated focused packer were selected due to expected low permeabilities, reservoir thickness and wellbore conditions. The wells were drilled in managed pressure drilling (MPD) conditions, with overbalance ranging from 900 to 4,300 psi. The development campaign consisted of five producers with key objectives of determining fluid type and the non-HC (CO2 in this case) content along with assessing the reservoir/block connectivity. The concentration and uncertainty in CO2 distribution would have a major impact in developing the production strategy of the area. A standard focused packer was selected for the sampling jobs which were carried out on pipe due to high overbalance conditions (~2,400 psi). In the exploration wells, 30+ samples (gas, oil and water) were collected with the time-on-wall ranging between 1.5 and 7 hours. In the development campaign, 50+ samples (gas and oil) were collected with the time-on-wall ranging between 45 minutes and 2.5 hours. Given the depths and low permeabilities of the reservoirs with high overbalance, this resulted in significant time savings. The larger flow area of the elongated and extra-elongated focused packers ensured minimal contamination in the collected samples given the challenging sampling conditions, where restrictions to pressure drawdown existed. The PVT laboratory results showed ‘insignificant’ oil-based mud filtrate contamination in the samples. In addition, the large sample volumes provided flexibility for additional PVT studies and improved resource assessment. The focused sampling technology was successfully applied in both exploration and development campaigns in the SE Asia region. The pre-job simulations ensured optimal packer selection between the three focused packer types. The comparison between the actual sampling results and the 3D near-wellbore simulation would help optimize future sampling operations in the area. In addition, the two campaigns have reiterated a clear value of information in saving cost, reducing contamination in the samples and technology success in the given environments.
通过评估多种封隔器类型的集中采样技术,在勘探和开发井中实现最佳井下流体采样-东南亚案例研究
随着聚焦取样技术的发展,电缆地层流体取样发生了巨大的变化。这主要是由于该技术能够获得具有代表性的地层流体样品,泥浆滤液污染最小,样本量大,从而增加了PVT实验室研究的价值,减少了流体取样时间,从而大大节省了成本。本文通过对不同储层性质的封隔器类型进行优化选择,展示了聚焦采样技术在东南亚众多勘探开发井中对储层流体作图的贡献。对于探井,主要目标是确定单相储层流体样品的非碳氢化合物(非hc)含量(在本例中为CO2和H2S),预计该样品接近饱和压力。在3D近井模拟之后,考虑到预期的低渗透率、储层厚度和井眼条件,选择了加长和超加长聚焦封隔器。这些井是在控压钻井(MPD)条件下钻井的,过平衡范围为900至4300 psi。该开发项目由五个生产商组成,主要目标是确定流体类型和非hc(在本例中为CO2)含量,同时评估储层/区块的连通性。二氧化碳分布的浓度和不确定性将对制定该地区的生产战略产生重大影响。由于高过平衡条件(~ 2400 psi),在管柱上进行取样作业时,选择了标准的聚焦封隔器。在探井中,采集了30多个样品(气、油、水),井壁时间在1.5 ~ 7小时之间。在开发过程中,收集了50多个样品(天然气和石油),在井壁上的时间在45分钟到2.5小时之间。考虑到高过平衡油藏的深度和低渗透率,这大大节省了时间。在具有挑战性的取样条件下(存在压降限制),加长和超加长聚焦封隔器的较大流动面积确保了采集样品中的污染最小。PVT实验室结果显示样品中“微不足道”的油基泥浆滤液污染。此外,大量的样本量为进一步的PVT研究和改进的资源评价提供了灵活性。该技术已成功应用于东南亚地区的勘探和开发活动。作业前模拟确保了三种重点封隔器类型之间的最佳选择。将实际采样结果与三维近井模拟结果进行比较,有助于优化该地区未来的采样作业。此外,这两项运动重申了信息在节约成本、减少样品污染和在特定环境中取得技术成功方面的明确价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信