Estimating discharge coefficient of triangular free overfall using the GMDH technique

IF 4.3 Q2 Environmental Science
A. Mohammed, A. Sharifi
{"title":"Estimating discharge coefficient of triangular free overfall using the GMDH technique","authors":"A. Mohammed, A. Sharifi","doi":"10.2166/ws.2023.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Free overfalls are hydraulic structures used in flood control, water supply, irrigation, and flow measurements. The hydraulic systems of free overfall depend on rectangular end shape. The studies that dealt with triangular crest are few and almost non-existent. In this study, a triangular end-shape design uses multiple linear regression (MLR) and group method of data handling (GMDH) methods for four models with six sub-models. Then, 24 scenarios were chosen and compared. The discharge coefficient (Cd) of a free overfall with a triangular terminal was predicted using experimental data. The triangular end edge shape increased crest length, the discharge coefficient, and discharge passing over free overfall. To this goal, 180 triangular free fall tests were performed. Data were collected for two triangular free overfalls with an opposite flow direction with three angles 600, 750, and 900. Results of Cd acquired using the two ways discussed above show that the algorithm GMDH outperforms the other method. Values for the GMDH approach mod46 testing variables: RMSE, MARE, SI, R2, and NSE are 6.08E-17, 2.65E-17, 6.00E-17, 100.00%, and 1.00, respectively, while these values for MLR are 0.06332, 0.05970, 0.06624, 15.431%, and −3.0419, respectively. The GMDH technique shows the best results concerning MLR and then chooses the best four scenarios from 24 with a Cd percentage error not exceeding ±2%.","PeriodicalId":17553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology-aqua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology-aqua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Free overfalls are hydraulic structures used in flood control, water supply, irrigation, and flow measurements. The hydraulic systems of free overfall depend on rectangular end shape. The studies that dealt with triangular crest are few and almost non-existent. In this study, a triangular end-shape design uses multiple linear regression (MLR) and group method of data handling (GMDH) methods for four models with six sub-models. Then, 24 scenarios were chosen and compared. The discharge coefficient (Cd) of a free overfall with a triangular terminal was predicted using experimental data. The triangular end edge shape increased crest length, the discharge coefficient, and discharge passing over free overfall. To this goal, 180 triangular free fall tests were performed. Data were collected for two triangular free overfalls with an opposite flow direction with three angles 600, 750, and 900. Results of Cd acquired using the two ways discussed above show that the algorithm GMDH outperforms the other method. Values for the GMDH approach mod46 testing variables: RMSE, MARE, SI, R2, and NSE are 6.08E-17, 2.65E-17, 6.00E-17, 100.00%, and 1.00, respectively, while these values for MLR are 0.06332, 0.05970, 0.06624, 15.431%, and −3.0419, respectively. The GMDH technique shows the best results concerning MLR and then chooses the best four scenarios from 24 with a Cd percentage error not exceeding ±2%.
利用GMDH技术估算三角自由溢流流量系数
自由溢流是用于防洪、供水、灌溉和流量测量的水工结构。自由溢流液压系统依赖于矩形端形。有关三角波峰的研究很少,几乎不存在。本研究采用多元线性回归(MLR)和数据处理分组方法(GMDH)对四个模型和六个子模型进行三角形端形设计。然后选择24个场景进行比较。利用实验数据预测了三角形末端自由溢流的流量系数。三角形的端缘形状增加了峰长、流量系数和通过自由溢流的流量。为此,进行了180次三角自由落体试验。收集了两个流向相反的三角形自由溢流的数据,三个角度分别为600、750和900。用上述两种方法获得的Cd结果表明,GMDH算法优于其他方法。GMDH方法mod46检验变量RMSE、MARE、SI、R2和NSE的值分别为6.08E-17、2.65E-17、6.00E-17、100.00%和1.00,MLR的值分别为0.06332、0.05970、0.06624、15.431%和- 3.0419。GMDH技术对MLR的结果最好,然后从24个场景中选择最佳的4个场景,Cd百分比误差不超过±2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - Aqua publishes peer-reviewed scientific & technical, review, and practical/ operational papers dealing with research and development in water supply technology and management, including economics, training and public relations on a national and international level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信